-
Why and When: Understanding System Initiative during Conversational Collaborative Search
Authors:
Sandeep Avula,
Bogeum Choi,
Jaime Arguello
Abstract:
In the last decade, conversational search has attracted considerable attention. However, most research has focused on systems that can support a \emph{single} searcher. In this paper, we explore how systems can support \emph{multiple} searchers collaborating over an instant messaging platform (i.e., Slack). We present a ``Wizard of Oz'' study in which 27 participant pairs collaborated on three inf…
▽ More
In the last decade, conversational search has attracted considerable attention. However, most research has focused on systems that can support a \emph{single} searcher. In this paper, we explore how systems can support \emph{multiple} searchers collaborating over an instant messaging platform (i.e., Slack). We present a ``Wizard of Oz'' study in which 27 participant pairs collaborated on three information-seeking tasks over Slack. Participants were unable to search on their own and had to gather information by interacting with a \emph{searchbot} directly from the Slack channel. The role of the searchbot was played by a reference librarian. Conversational search systems must be capable of engaging in \emph{mixed-initiative} interaction by taking and relinquishing control of the conversation to fulfill different objectives. Discourse analysis research suggests that conversational agents can take \emph{two} levels of initiative: dialog- and task-level initiative. Agents take dialog-level initiative to establish mutual belief between agents and task-level initiative to influence the goals of the other agents. During the study, participants were exposed to three experimental conditions in which the searchbot could take different levels of initiative: (1) no initiative, (2) only dialog-level initiative, and (3) both dialog- and task-level initiative. In this paper, we focus on understanding the Wizard's actions. Specifically, we focus on understanding the Wizard's motivations for taking initiative and their rationale for the timing of each intervention. To gain insights about the Wizard's actions, we conducted a stimulated recall interview with the Wizard. We present findings from a qualitative analysis of this interview data and discuss implications for designing conversational search systems to support collaborative search.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Building Robust Machine Learning Models for Small Chemical Science Data: The Case of Shear Viscosity
Authors:
Nikhil V. S. Avula,
Shivanand K. Veesam,
Sudarshan Behera,
Sundaram Balasubramanian
Abstract:
Shear viscosity, though being a fundamental property of all liquids, is computationally expensive to estimate from equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Recently, Machine Learning (ML) methods have been used to augment molecular simulations in many contexts, thus showing promise to estimate viscosity too in a relatively inexpensive manner. However, ML methods face significant challenges like…
▽ More
Shear viscosity, though being a fundamental property of all liquids, is computationally expensive to estimate from equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. Recently, Machine Learning (ML) methods have been used to augment molecular simulations in many contexts, thus showing promise to estimate viscosity too in a relatively inexpensive manner. However, ML methods face significant challenges like overfitting when the size of the data set is small, as is the case with viscosity. In this work, we train several ML models to predict the shear viscosity of a Lennard-Jones (LJ) fluid, with particular emphasis on addressing issues arising from a small data set. Specifically, the issues related to model selection, performance estimation and uncertainty quantification were investigated. First, we show that the widely used performance estimation procedure of using a single unseen data set shows a wide variability on small data sets. In this context, the common practice of using Cross validation (CV) to select the hyperparameters (model selection) can be adapted to estimate the generalization error (performance estimation) as well. We compare two simple CV procedures for their ability to do both model selection and performance estimation, and find that k-fold CV based procedure shows a lower variance of error estimates. We discuss the role of performance metrics in training and evaluation. Finally, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and ensemble methods were used to estimate the uncertainty on individual predictions. The uncertainty estimates from GPR were also used to construct an applicability domain using which the ML models provided more reliable predictions on another small data set generated in this work. Overall, the procedures prescribed in this work, together, lead to robust ML models for small data sets.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
The Effects of System Initiative during Conversational Collaborative Search
Authors:
Sandeep Avula,
Bogeum Choi,
Jaime Arguello
Abstract:
Our research in this paper lies at the intersection of collaborative and conversational search. We report on a Wizard of Oz lab study in which 27 pairs of participants collaborated on search tasks over the Slack messaging platform. To complete tasks, pairs of collaborators interacted with a so-called \emph{searchbot} with conversational capabilities. The role of the searchbot was played by a refer…
▽ More
Our research in this paper lies at the intersection of collaborative and conversational search. We report on a Wizard of Oz lab study in which 27 pairs of participants collaborated on search tasks over the Slack messaging platform. To complete tasks, pairs of collaborators interacted with a so-called \emph{searchbot} with conversational capabilities. The role of the searchbot was played by a reference librarian. It is widely accepted that conversational search systems should be able to engage in \emph{mixed-initiative interaction} -- take and relinquish control of a multi-agent conversation as appropriate. Research in discourse analysis differentiates between dialog- and task-level initiative. Taking \emph{dialog-level} initiative involves leading a conversation for the sole purpose of establishing mutual belief between agents. Conversely, taking \emph{task-level} initiative involves leading a conversation with the intent to influence the goals of the other agent(s). Participants in our study experienced three \emph{searchbot conditions}, which varied based on the level of initiative the human searchbot was able to take: (1) no initiative, (2) only dialog-level initiative, and (3) both dialog- and task-level initiative. We investigate the effects of the searchbot condition on six different types of outcomes: (RQ1) perceptions of the searchbot's utility, (RQ2) perceptions of workload, (RQ3) perceptions of the collaboration, (RQ4) patterns of communication and collaboration, and perceived (RQ5) benefits and (RQ6) challenges from engaging with the searchbot.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Report on the First HIPstIR Workshop on the Future of Information Retrieval
Authors:
Laura Dietz,
Bhaskar Mitra,
Jeremy Pickens,
Hana Anber,
Sandeep Avula,
Asia Biega,
Adrian Boteanu,
Shubham Chatterjee,
Jeff Dalton,
Shiri Dori-Hacohen,
John Foley,
Henry Feild,
Ben Gamari,
Rosie Jones,
Pallika Kanani,
Sumanta Kashyapi,
Widad Machmouchi,
Matthew Mitsui,
Steve Nole,
Alexandre Tachard Passos,
Jordan Ramsdell,
Adam Roegiest,
David Smith,
Alessandro Sordoni
Abstract:
The vision of HIPstIR is that early stage information retrieval (IR) researchers get together to develop a future for non-mainstream ideas and research agendas in IR. The first iteration of this vision materialized in the form of a three day workshop in Portsmouth, New Hampshire attended by 24 researchers across academia and industry. Attendees pre-submitted one or more topics that they want to pi…
▽ More
The vision of HIPstIR is that early stage information retrieval (IR) researchers get together to develop a future for non-mainstream ideas and research agendas in IR. The first iteration of this vision materialized in the form of a three day workshop in Portsmouth, New Hampshire attended by 24 researchers across academia and industry. Attendees pre-submitted one or more topics that they want to pitch at the meeting. Then over the three days during the workshop, we self-organized into groups and worked on six specific proposals of common interest. In this report, we present an overview of the workshop and brief summaries of the six proposals that resulted from the workshop.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
