-
A First Look at Starlink In-Flight Performance: An Intercontinental Empirical Study
Authors:
Muhammad Asad Ullah,
Luca Borgianni,
Heikki Kokkinen,
Antti Anttonen,
Stefano Giordano
Abstract:
Starlink delivers Internet services to users across terrestrial, maritime, and aviation domains. The prior works have studied its performance at fixed sites and in-motion vehicles, while an in-depth analysis of in-flight performance remains absent. With major airlines now offering Starlink Internet onboard, there is a growing need to evaluate and improve its performance for aviation users. This pa…
▽ More
Starlink delivers Internet services to users across terrestrial, maritime, and aviation domains. The prior works have studied its performance at fixed sites and in-motion vehicles, while an in-depth analysis of in-flight performance remains absent. With major airlines now offering Starlink Internet onboard, there is a growing need to evaluate and improve its performance for aviation users. This paper addresses this shortcoming by conducting in-flight measurements over the Baltic Sea and the Pacific Ocean. Our measurement results show that a single user device experiences median throughputs of 64 Mbps and 24 Mbps for the downlink and uplink, respectively. The median uplink throughput is approximately 33 Mbps when the aircraft maintains an altitude above 17,000 feet. However, a significant reduction in uplink performance is observed during the aircraft descent phase, with the median throughput dropping to around 20 Mbps at lower altitudes. Round-trip time (RTT) is highly dependent on the location of the ground station being pinged and the use of inter-satellite links (ISLs). We dive deeper into 5.5 hours of ping measurements collected over the Pacific Ocean and investigate factors influencing RTT, hypothesizing that ISLs routing, data queuing at satellites, and feeder link congestion contribute to deviations from theoretical values. For comparative analysis, we evaluate the Starlink ground terminal and in-flight connectivity performance from the perspectives of a residential user and an airline passenger, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2025;
originally announced August 2025.
-
Impact of Weather on Satellite Communication: Evaluating Starlink Resilience
Authors:
Muhammad Asad Ullah,
Antti Heikkinen,
Mikko Uitto,
Antti Anttonen,
Konstantin Mikhaylov
Abstract:
Satellite communications have emerged as one of the most feasible solutions to provide global wireless coverage and connect the unconnected. Starlink dominates the market with over 7,000 operational satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) and offers global high-speed and low-latency Internet service for stationary and mobile use cases, including in-motion connectivity for vehicles, vessels, and aircra…
▽ More
Satellite communications have emerged as one of the most feasible solutions to provide global wireless coverage and connect the unconnected. Starlink dominates the market with over 7,000 operational satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) and offers global high-speed and low-latency Internet service for stationary and mobile use cases, including in-motion connectivity for vehicles, vessels, and aircraft. Starlink terminals are designed to handle extreme weather conditions. Starlink recommends a flat high performance (FHP) terminal for users living in areas with extreme weather conditions. The earlier studies evaluated Starlink's FHP throughput for stationary and in-motion users without providing a detailed analysis of how weather affects its performance. There remains a need to investigate the impact of weather on FHP's throughput. In this paper, we address this shortcoming by analyzing the impact of weather on Starlink's performance in Oulu, Finland, a city located in Northern Europe near the Arctic Circle. Our measurements reveal that rain degrades median uplink and downlink throughput by 52.27% and 37.84%, respectively. On the contrary, there was no noticeable impact on the round-trip time. Additionally, we also examine the impact of cloud cover on the Starlink throughput. The linear regression analysis reveals the negative relationship between throughput and cloud cover. The cloud cover of up to 12.5% has around 20% greater throughput than the cloud cover of 87.5%
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Starlink in Northern Europe: A New Look at Stationary and In-motion Performance
Authors:
Muhammad Asad Ullah,
Antti Heikkinen,
Mikko Uitto,
Marko Höyhtyä,
Antti Anttonen,
Konstantin Mikhaylov,
Timo Lind
Abstract:
Starlink has introduced the Flat High Performance (FHP) terminal, specifically designed to support the vehicles and the vessels in motion as well as the high-demand stationary users. The research on FHP terminal throughput analysis remains limited, only a few existing studies evaluate FHP, focusing on the limited parameters and scenarios. This paper evaluates the FHP terminal's performance in Finl…
▽ More
Starlink has introduced the Flat High Performance (FHP) terminal, specifically designed to support the vehicles and the vessels in motion as well as the high-demand stationary users. The research on FHP terminal throughput analysis remains limited, only a few existing studies evaluate FHP, focusing on the limited parameters and scenarios. This paper evaluates the FHP terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe. We examine round-trip time (RTT), uplink, and downlink throughput for both stationary and in-motion use. We measure network efficiency across six geographically diverse servers and get insights of network routing strategies. Our results show that Starlink provides high-speed, low-RTT connectivity, however, the throughput experiences fluctuations with slight degradation when in motion. Additionally, we compare Starlink and terrestrial network RTT and possible routing paths.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Hybrid Self-Organizing Networks: Evolution, Standardization Trends, and a 6G Architecture Vision
Authors:
Abdelaali Chaoub,
Aarne Mämmelä,
Pedro Martinez-Julia,
Ranganai Chaparadza,
Muslim Elkotob,
Lyndon Ong,
Dilip Krishnaswamy,
Antti Anttonen,
Ashutosh Dutta
Abstract:
Self-organizing networks (SONs) need to be endowed with self-coordination capabilities to manage the complex relations between their internal components and to avoid their destructive interactions. Existing communication technologies commonly implement responsive self-coordination mechanisms that can be very slow in dynamic situations. The sixth generation (6G) networks, being in their early stage…
▽ More
Self-organizing networks (SONs) need to be endowed with self-coordination capabilities to manage the complex relations between their internal components and to avoid their destructive interactions. Existing communication technologies commonly implement responsive self-coordination mechanisms that can be very slow in dynamic situations. The sixth generation (6G) networks, being in their early stages of research and standardization activities, open new opportunities to opt for a design-driven approach when developing self-coordination capabilities. This can be achieved through the use of hybrid SON designs. A hybrid architecture combines the centralized and distributed management and control. In this article, we review the history of SONs including the inherent self-coordination feature. We then delve into the concept of hybrid SONs (H-SONs), and we summarize the challenges, opportunities, and future trends for H-SON development. We provide a comprehensive collection of standardization activities and recommendations, discussing the key contributions and potential work to continue the evolution and push for a wide adoption of the H-SON paradigm. More importantly, as a key 6G architectural feature we propose that H-SONs should be loosely coupled networks. Loose coupling refers to the weak interaction of different layers and weak interaction between users in the same layer, i.e., the various feedback loops must be almost isolated from each other to improve the stability and to avoid chaotic situations. We finally conclude the paper with the key hints about the future landscape and the key drivers of 6G H-SONs.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2023; v1 submitted 17 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
