Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Andersen, O

Challenges and Advancements in Modeling Shock Fronts with Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Review and Benchmarking Study

Authors: Jassem Abbasi, Ameya D. Jagtap, Ben Moseley, Aksel Hiorth, Pål Østebø Andersen

Abstract: Solving partial differential equations (PDEs) with discontinuous solutions , such as shock waves in multiphase viscous flow in porous media , is critical for a wide range of scientific and engineering applications, as they represent sudden changes in physical quantities. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), an approach proposed for solving PDEs, encounter significant challenges when applied t… ▽ More Solving partial differential equations (PDEs) with discontinuous solutions , such as shock waves in multiphase viscous flow in porous media , is critical for a wide range of scientific and engineering applications, as they represent sudden changes in physical quantities. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), an approach proposed for solving PDEs, encounter significant challenges when applied to such systems. Accurately solving PDEs with discontinuities using PINNs requires specialized techniques to ensure effective solution accuracy and numerical stability. A benchmarking study was conducted on two multiphase flow problems in porous media: the classic Buckley-Leverett (BL) problem and a fully coupled system of equations involving shock waves but with varying levels of solution complexity. The findings show that PM and LM approaches can provide accurate solutions for the BL problem by effectively addressing the infinite gradients associated with shock occurrences. In contrast, AM methods failed to effectively resolve the shock waves. When applied to fully coupled PDEs (with more complex loss landscape), the generalization error in the solutions quickly increased, highlighting the need for ongoing innovation. This study provides a comprehensive review of existing techniques for managing PDE discontinuities using PINNs, offering information on their strengths and limitations. The results underscore the necessity for further research to improve PINNs ability to handle complex discontinuities, particularly in more challenging problems with complex loss landscapes. This includes problems involving higher dimensions or multiphysics systems, where current methods often struggle to maintain accuracy and efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.

Comments: 15 figures, 5 tables, and 37 pages

History-Matching of Imbibition Flow in Multiscale Fractured Porous Media Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)

Authors: Jassem Abbasi, Ben Moseley, Takeshi Kurotori, Ameya D. Jagtap, Anthony R. Kovscek, Aksel Hiorth, Pål Østebø Andersen

Abstract: We propose a workflow based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to model multiphase fluid flow in fractured porous media. After validating the workflow in forward and inverse modeling of a synthetic problem of flow in fractured porous media, we applied it to a real experimental dataset in which brine is injected at a constant pressure drop into a CO2 saturated naturally fractured shale cor… ▽ More We propose a workflow based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to model multiphase fluid flow in fractured porous media. After validating the workflow in forward and inverse modeling of a synthetic problem of flow in fractured porous media, we applied it to a real experimental dataset in which brine is injected at a constant pressure drop into a CO2 saturated naturally fractured shale core plug. The exact spatial positions of natural fractures and the dynamic in-situ distribution of fluids were imaged using a CT-scan setup. To model the targeted system, we followed a domain decomposition approach for matrix and fractures and a multi-network architecture for the separate calculation of water saturation and pressure. The flow equations in the matrix, fractures and interplay between them were solved during training. Prior to fully-coupled simulations, we proposed pre-training the model. This aided in a more efficient and successful training of the coupled system. Both for the synthetic and experimental inverse problems, we determined flow parameters within the matrix and the fractures. Multiple random initializations of network and system parameters were performed to assess the uncertainty and uniqueness of the results. The results confirmed the precision of the inverse calculated parameters in retrieving the main flow characteristics of the system. The consideration of multiscale matrix-fracture impacts is commonly overlooked in existing workflows. Accounting for them led to several orders of magnitude variations in the calculated flow properties compared to not accounting for them. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed PINNs-based workflow is the first to offer a reliable and computationally efficient solution for inverse modeling of multiphase flow in fractured porous media, achieved through history-matching noisy and multi-fidelity experimental measurements. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2024; v1 submitted 28 October, 2024; originally announced October 2024.

Comments: 47 pages of paper, including 19 figures

"It depends": Configuring AI to Improve Clinical Usefulness Across Contexts

Authors: Hubert D. Zając, Jorge M. N. Ribeiro, Silvia Ingala, Simona Gentile, Ruth Wanjohi, Samuel N. Gitau, Jonathan F. Carlsen, Michael B. Nielsen, Tariq O. Andersen

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) repeatedly match or outperform radiologists in lab experiments. However, real-world implementations of radiological AI-based systems are found to provide little to no clinical value. This paper explores how to design AI for clinical usefulness in different contexts. We conducted 19 design sessions and design interventions with 13 radiologists from 7 clinical sites in D… ▽ More Artificial Intelligence (AI) repeatedly match or outperform radiologists in lab experiments. However, real-world implementations of radiological AI-based systems are found to provide little to no clinical value. This paper explores how to design AI for clinical usefulness in different contexts. We conducted 19 design sessions and design interventions with 13 radiologists from 7 clinical sites in Denmark and Kenya, based on three iterations of a functional AI-based prototype. Ten sociotechnical dependencies were identified as crucial for the design of AI in radiology. We conceptualised four technical dimensions that must be configured to the intended clinical context of use: AI functionality, AI medical focus, AI decision threshold, and AI Explainability. We present four design recommendations on how to address dependencies pertaining to the medical knowledge, clinic type, user expertise level, patient context, and user situation that condition the configuration of these technical dimensions. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Prompting open-source and commercial language models for grammatical error correction of English learner text

Authors: Christopher Davis, Andrew Caines, Øistein Andersen, Shiva Taslimipoor, Helen Yannakoudakis, Zheng Yuan, Christopher Bryant, Marek Rei, Paula Buttery

Abstract: Thanks to recent advances in generative AI, we are able to prompt large language models (LLMs) to produce texts which are fluent and grammatical. In addition, it has been shown that we can elicit attempts at grammatical error correction (GEC) from LLMs when prompted with ungrammatical input sentences. We evaluate how well LLMs can perform at GEC by measuring their performance on established benchm… ▽ More Thanks to recent advances in generative AI, we are able to prompt large language models (LLMs) to produce texts which are fluent and grammatical. In addition, it has been shown that we can elicit attempts at grammatical error correction (GEC) from LLMs when prompted with ungrammatical input sentences. We evaluate how well LLMs can perform at GEC by measuring their performance on established benchmark datasets. We go beyond previous studies, which only examined GPT* models on a selection of English GEC datasets, by evaluating seven open-source and three commercial LLMs on four established GEC benchmarks. We investigate model performance and report results against individual error types. Our results indicate that LLMs do not always outperform supervised English GEC models except in specific contexts -- namely commercial LLMs on benchmarks annotated with fluency corrections as opposed to minimal edits. We find that several open-source models outperform commercial ones on minimal edit benchmarks, and that in some settings zero-shot prompting is just as competitive as few-shot prompting. △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2025; v1 submitted 15 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 8 pages with appendices; accepted to ACL Findings 2024

Ground Truth Or Dare: Factors Affecting The Creation Of Medical Datasets For Training AI

Authors: Hubert D. Zając, Natalia R. Avlona, Tariq O. Andersen, Finn Kensing, Irina Shklovski

Abstract: One of the core goals of responsible AI development is ensuring high-quality training datasets. Many researchers have pointed to the importance of the annotation step in the creation of high-quality data, but less attention has been paid to the work that enables data annotation. We define this work as the design of ground truth schema and explore the challenges involved in the creation of datasets… ▽ More One of the core goals of responsible AI development is ensuring high-quality training datasets. Many researchers have pointed to the importance of the annotation step in the creation of high-quality data, but less attention has been paid to the work that enables data annotation. We define this work as the design of ground truth schema and explore the challenges involved in the creation of datasets in the medical domain even before any annotations are made. Based on extensive work in three health-tech organisations, we describe five external and internal factors that condition medical dataset creation processes. Three external factors include regulatory constraints, the context of creation and use, and commercial and operational pressures. These factors condition medical data collection and shape the ground truth schema design. Two internal factors include epistemic differences and limits of labelling. These directly shape the design of the ground truth schema. Discussions of what constitutes high-quality data need to pay attention to the factors that shape and constrain what is possible to be created, to ensure responsible AI design. △ Less

Submitted 12 August, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

On the application of Large Language Models for language teaching and assessment technology

Authors: Andrew Caines, Luca Benedetto, Shiva Taslimipoor, Christopher Davis, Yuan Gao, Oeistein Andersen, Zheng Yuan, Mark Elliott, Russell Moore, Christopher Bryant, Marek Rei, Helen Yannakoudakis, Andrew Mullooly, Diane Nicholls, Paula Buttery

Abstract: The recent release of very large language models such as PaLM and GPT-4 has made an unprecedented impact in the popular media and public consciousness, giving rise to a mixture of excitement and fear as to their capabilities and potential uses, and shining a light on natural language processing research which had not previously received so much attention. The developments offer great promise for e… ▽ More The recent release of very large language models such as PaLM and GPT-4 has made an unprecedented impact in the popular media and public consciousness, giving rise to a mixture of excitement and fear as to their capabilities and potential uses, and shining a light on natural language processing research which had not previously received so much attention. The developments offer great promise for education technology, and in this paper we look specifically at the potential for incorporating large language models in AI-driven language teaching and assessment systems. We consider several research areas and also discuss the risks and ethical considerations surrounding generative AI in education technology for language learners. Overall we find that larger language models offer improvements over previous models in text generation, opening up routes toward content generation which had not previously been plausible. For text generation they must be prompted carefully and their outputs may need to be reshaped before they are ready for use. For automated grading and grammatical error correction, tasks whose progress is checked on well-known benchmarks, early investigations indicate that large language models on their own do not improve on state-of-the-art results according to standard evaluation metrics. For grading it appears that linguistic features established in the literature should still be used for best performance, and for error correction it may be that the models can offer alternative feedback styles which are not measured sensitively with existing methods. In all cases, there is work to be done to experiment with the inclusion of large language models in education technology for language learners, in order to properly understand and report on their capacities and limitations, and to ensure that foreseeable risks such as misinformation and harmful bias are mitigated. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: Accepted at the AIED2023 workshop: Empowering Education with LLMs - the Next-Gen Interface and Content Generation

Simulation and Prediction of Countercurrent Spontaneous Imbibition at Early and Late Times Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Authors: Jassem Abbasi, Pål Østebø Andersen

Abstract: The application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) is investigated for the first time in solving the one-dimensional Countercurrent spontaneous imbibition (COUCSI) problem at both early and late time (i.e., before and after the imbibition front meets the no-flow boundary). We introduce utilization of Change-of-Variables as a technique for improving performance of PINNs. We formulated the… ▽ More The application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) is investigated for the first time in solving the one-dimensional Countercurrent spontaneous imbibition (COUCSI) problem at both early and late time (i.e., before and after the imbibition front meets the no-flow boundary). We introduce utilization of Change-of-Variables as a technique for improving performance of PINNs. We formulated the COUCSI problem in three equivalent forms by changing the independent variables. The first describes saturation as function of normalized position X and time T; the second as function of X and Y=T^0.5; and the third as a sole function of Z=X/T^0.5 (valid only at early time). The PINN model was generated using a feed-forward neural network and trained based on minimizing a weighted loss function, including the physics-informed loss term and terms corresponding to the initial and boundary conditions. All three formulations could closely approximate the correct solutions, with water saturation mean absolute errors around 0.019 and 0.009 for XT and XY formulations and 0.012 for the Z formulation at early time. The Z formulation perfectly captured the self-similarity of the system at early time. This was less captured by XT and XY formulations. The total variation of saturation was preserved in the Z formulation, and it was better preserved with XY- than XT formulation. Redefining the problem based on the physics-inspired variables reduced the non-linearity of the problem and allowed higher solution accuracies, a higher degree of loss-landscape convexity, a lower number of required collocation points, smaller network sizes, and more computationally efficient solutions. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2023; v1 submitted 6 May, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Physical Activation Functions (PAFs): An Approach for More Efficient Induction of Physics into Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)

Authors: Jassem Abbasi, Pål Østebø Andersen

Abstract: In recent years, the gap between Deep Learning (DL) methods and analytical or numerical approaches in scientific computing is tried to be filled by the evolution of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). However, still, there are many complications in the training of PINNs and optimal interleaving of physical models. Here, we introduced the concept of Physical Activation Functions (PAFs). This… ▽ More In recent years, the gap between Deep Learning (DL) methods and analytical or numerical approaches in scientific computing is tried to be filled by the evolution of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). However, still, there are many complications in the training of PINNs and optimal interleaving of physical models. Here, we introduced the concept of Physical Activation Functions (PAFs). This concept offers that instead of using general activation functions (AFs) such as ReLU, tanh, and sigmoid for all the neurons, one can use generic AFs that their mathematical expression is inherited from the physical laws of the investigating phenomena. The formula of PAFs may be inspired by the terms in the analytical solution of the problem. We showed that the PAFs can be inspired by any mathematical formula related to the investigating phenomena such as the initial or boundary conditions of the PDE system. We validated the advantages of PAFs for several PDEs including the harmonic oscillations, Burgers, Advection-Convection equation, and the heterogeneous diffusion equations. The main advantage of PAFs was in the more efficient constraining and interleaving of PINNs with the investigating physical phenomena and their underlying mathematical models. This added constraint significantly improved the predictions of PINNs for the testing data that was out-of-training distribution. Furthermore, the application of PAFs reduced the size of the PINNs up to 75% in different cases. Also, the value of loss terms was reduced by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude in some cases which is noteworthy for upgrading the training of the PINNs. The iterations required for finding the optimum values were also significantly reduced. It is concluded that using the PAFs helps in generating PINNs with less complexity and much more validity for longer ranges of prediction. △ Less

Submitted 17 June, 2023; v1 submitted 29 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: 26 pages, 9 figures