Showing 1–18 of 18 results for author: Aliakbarpour, M

On the Structure of Replicable Hypothesis Testers

Authors: Anders Aamand, Maryam Aliakbarpour, Justin Y. Chen, Shyam Narayanan, Sandeep Silwal

Abstract: A hypothesis testing algorithm is replicable if, when run on two different samples from the same distribution, it produces the same output with high probability. This notion, defined by by Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, and Sorell [STOC'22], can increase trust in testing procedures and is deeply related to algorithmic stability, generalization, and privacy. We build general tools to prove lower and up… ▽ More A hypothesis testing algorithm is replicable if, when run on two different samples from the same distribution, it produces the same output with high probability. This notion, defined by by Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, and Sorell [STOC'22], can increase trust in testing procedures and is deeply related to algorithmic stability, generalization, and privacy. We build general tools to prove lower and upper bounds on the sample complexity of replicable testers, unifying and quantitatively improving upon existing results. We identify a set of canonical properties, and prove that any replicable testing algorithm can be modified to satisfy these properties without worsening accuracy or sample complexity. A canonical replicable algorithm computes a deterministic function of its input (i.e., a test statistic) and thresholds against a uniformly random value in $[0,1]$. It is invariant to the order in which the samples are received, and, if the testing problem is ``symmetric,'' then the algorithm is also invariant to the labeling of the domain elements, resolving an open question by Liu and Ye [NeurIPS'24]. We prove new lower bounds for uniformity, identity, and closeness testing by reducing to the case where the replicable algorithm satisfies these canonical properties. We systematize and improve upon a common strategy for replicable algorithm design based on test statistics with known expectation and bounded variance. Our framework allow testers which have been extensively analyzed in the non-replicable setting to be made replicable with minimal overhead. As direct applications of our framework, we obtain constant-factor optimal bounds for coin testing and closeness testing and get replicability for free in a large parameter regime for uniformity testing. We also give state-of-the-art bounds for replicable Gaussian mean testing, and, unlike prior work, our algorithm runs in polynomial time. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2025; originally announced July 2025.

Comments: Abstract abridged to meet arxiv requirements

Nearly-Linear Time Private Hypothesis Selection with the Optimal Approximation Factor

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Zhan Shi, Ria Stevens, Vincent X. Wang

Abstract: Estimating the density of a distribution from its samples is a fundamental problem in statistics. Hypothesis selection addresses the setting where, in addition to a sample set, we are given $n$ candidate distributions -- referred to as hypotheses -- and the goal is to determine which one best describes the underlying data distribution. This problem is known to be solvable very efficiently, requiri… ▽ More Estimating the density of a distribution from its samples is a fundamental problem in statistics. Hypothesis selection addresses the setting where, in addition to a sample set, we are given $n$ candidate distributions -- referred to as hypotheses -- and the goal is to determine which one best describes the underlying data distribution. This problem is known to be solvable very efficiently, requiring roughly $O(\log n)$ samples and running in $\tilde{O}(n)$ time. The quality of the output is measured via the total variation distance to the unknown distribution, and the approximation factor of the algorithm determines how large this distance is compared to the optimal distance achieved by the best candidate hypothesis. It is known that $α= 3$ is the optimal approximation factor for this problem. We study hypothesis selection under the constraint of differential privacy. We propose a differentially private algorithm in the central model that runs in nearly-linear time with respect to the number of hypotheses, achieves the optimal approximation factor, and incurs only a modest increase in sample complexity, which remains polylogarithmic in $n$. This resolves an open question posed by [Bun, Kamath, Steinke, Wu, NeurIPS 2019]. Prior to our work, existing upper bounds required quadratic time. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2025; originally announced June 2025.

Comments: 33 pages

Better Private Distribution Testing by Leveraging Unverified Auxiliary Data

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Arnav Burudgunte, Clément Cannone, Ronitt Rubinfeld

Abstract: We extend the framework of augmented distribution testing (Aliakbarpour, Indyk, Rubinfeld, and Silwal, NeurIPS 2024) to the differentially private setting. This captures scenarios where a data analyst must perform hypothesis testing tasks on sensitive data, but is able to leverage prior knowledge (public, but possibly erroneous or untrusted) about the data distribution. We design private algorit… ▽ More We extend the framework of augmented distribution testing (Aliakbarpour, Indyk, Rubinfeld, and Silwal, NeurIPS 2024) to the differentially private setting. This captures scenarios where a data analyst must perform hypothesis testing tasks on sensitive data, but is able to leverage prior knowledge (public, but possibly erroneous or untrusted) about the data distribution. We design private algorithms in this augmented setting for three flagship distribution testing tasks, uniformity, identity, and closeness testing, whose sample complexity smoothly scales with the claimed quality of the auxiliary information. We complement our algorithms with information-theoretic lower bounds, showing that their sample complexity is optimal (up to logarithmic factors). △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.

Privacy in Metalearning and Multitask Learning: Modeling and Separations

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Konstantina Bairaktari, Adam Smith, Marika Swanberg, Jonathan Ullman

Abstract: Model personalization allows a set of individuals, each facing a different learning task, to train models that are more accurate for each person than those they could develop individually. The goals of personalization are captured in a variety of formal frameworks, such as multitask learning and metalearning. Combining data for model personalization poses risks for privacy because the output of an… ▽ More Model personalization allows a set of individuals, each facing a different learning task, to train models that are more accurate for each person than those they could develop individually. The goals of personalization are captured in a variety of formal frameworks, such as multitask learning and metalearning. Combining data for model personalization poses risks for privacy because the output of an individual's model can depend on the data of other individuals. In this work we undertake a systematic study of differentially private personalized learning. Our first main contribution is to construct a taxonomy of formal frameworks for private personalized learning. This taxonomy captures different formal frameworks for learning as well as different threat models for the attacker. Our second main contribution is to prove separations between the personalized learning problems corresponding to different choices. In particular, we prove a novel separation between private multitask learning and private metalearning. △ Less

Submitted 16 December, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

Optimal Algorithms for Augmented Testing of Discrete Distributions

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Piotr Indyk, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Sandeep Silwal

Abstract: We consider the problem of hypothesis testing for discrete distributions. In the standard model, where we have sample access to an underlying distribution $p$, extensive research has established optimal bounds for uniformity testing, identity testing (goodness of fit), and closeness testing (equivalence or two-sample testing). We explore these problems in a setting where a predicted data distribut… ▽ More We consider the problem of hypothesis testing for discrete distributions. In the standard model, where we have sample access to an underlying distribution $p$, extensive research has established optimal bounds for uniformity testing, identity testing (goodness of fit), and closeness testing (equivalence or two-sample testing). We explore these problems in a setting where a predicted data distribution, possibly derived from historical data or predictive machine learning models, is available. We demonstrate that such a predictor can indeed reduce the number of samples required for all three property testing tasks. The reduction in sample complexity depends directly on the predictor's quality, measured by its total variation distance from $p$. A key advantage of our algorithms is their adaptability to the precision of the prediction. Specifically, our algorithms can self-adjust their sample complexity based on the accuracy of the available prediction, operating without any prior knowledge of the estimation's accuracy (i.e. they are consistent). Additionally, we never use more samples than the standard approaches require, even if the predictions provide no meaningful information (i.e. they are also robust). We provide lower bounds to indicate that the improvements in sample complexity achieved by our algorithms are information-theoretically optimal. Furthermore, experimental results show that the performance of our algorithms on real data significantly exceeds our worst-case guarantees for sample complexity, demonstrating the practicality of our approach. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

Comments: To appear in NeurIPS 24

Enhancing Feature-Specific Data Protection via Bayesian Coordinate Differential Privacy

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Syomantak Chaudhuri, Thomas A. Courtade, Alireza Fallah, Michael I. Jordan

Abstract: Local Differential Privacy (LDP) offers strong privacy guarantees without requiring users to trust external parties. However, LDP applies uniform protection to all data features, including less sensitive ones, which degrades performance of downstream tasks. To overcome this limitation, we propose a Bayesian framework, Bayesian Coordinate Differential Privacy (BCDP), that enables feature-specific p… ▽ More Local Differential Privacy (LDP) offers strong privacy guarantees without requiring users to trust external parties. However, LDP applies uniform protection to all data features, including less sensitive ones, which degrades performance of downstream tasks. To overcome this limitation, we propose a Bayesian framework, Bayesian Coordinate Differential Privacy (BCDP), that enables feature-specific privacy quantification. This more nuanced approach complements LDP by adjusting privacy protection according to the sensitivity of each feature, enabling improved performance of downstream tasks without compromising privacy. We characterize the properties of BCDP and articulate its connections with standard non-Bayesian privacy frameworks. We further apply our BCDP framework to the problems of private mean estimation and ordinary least-squares regression. The BCDP-based approach obtains improved accuracy compared to a purely LDP-based approach, without compromising on privacy. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2024; originally announced October 2024.

Metalearning with Very Few Samples Per Task

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Konstantina Bairaktari, Gavin Brown, Adam Smith, Nathan Srebro, Jonathan Ullman

Abstract: Metalearning and multitask learning are two frameworks for solving a group of related learning tasks more efficiently than we could hope to solve each of the individual tasks on their own. In multitask learning, we are given a fixed set of related learning tasks and need to output one accurate model per task, whereas in metalearning we are given tasks that are drawn i.i.d. from a metadistribution… ▽ More Metalearning and multitask learning are two frameworks for solving a group of related learning tasks more efficiently than we could hope to solve each of the individual tasks on their own. In multitask learning, we are given a fixed set of related learning tasks and need to output one accurate model per task, whereas in metalearning we are given tasks that are drawn i.i.d. from a metadistribution and need to output some common information that can be easily specialized to new tasks from the metadistribution. We consider a binary classification setting where tasks are related by a shared representation, that is, every task $P$ can be solved by a classifier of the form $f_{P} \circ h$ where $h \in H$ is a map from features to a representation space that is shared across tasks, and $f_{P} \in F$ is a task-specific classifier from the representation space to labels. The main question we ask is how much data do we need to metalearn a good representation? Here, the amount of data is measured in terms of the number of tasks $t$ that we need to see and the number of samples $n$ per task. We focus on the regime where $n$ is extremely small. Our main result shows that, in a distribution-free setting where the feature vectors are in $\mathbb{R}^d$, the representation is a linear map from $\mathbb{R}^d \to \mathbb{R}^k$, and the task-specific classifiers are halfspaces in $\mathbb{R}^k$, we can metalearn a representation with error $\varepsilon$ using $n = k+2$ samples per task, and $d \cdot (1/\varepsilon)^{O(k)}$ tasks. Learning with so few samples per task is remarkable because metalearning would be impossible with $k+1$ samples per task, and because we cannot even hope to learn an accurate task-specific classifier with $k+2$ samples per task. Our work also yields a characterization of distribution-free multitask learning and reductions between meta and multitask learning. △ Less

Submitted 1 April, 2024; v1 submitted 21 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Differentially Private Medians and Interior Points for Non-Pathological Data

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Rose Silver, Thomas Steinke, Jonathan Ullman

Abstract: We construct differentially private estimators with low sample complexity that estimate the median of an arbitrary distribution over $\mathbb{R}$ satisfying very mild moment conditions. Our result stands in contrast to the surprising negative result of Bun et al. (FOCS 2015) that showed there is no differentially private estimator with any finite sample complexity that returns any non-trivial appr… ▽ More We construct differentially private estimators with low sample complexity that estimate the median of an arbitrary distribution over $\mathbb{R}$ satisfying very mild moment conditions. Our result stands in contrast to the surprising negative result of Bun et al. (FOCS 2015) that showed there is no differentially private estimator with any finite sample complexity that returns any non-trivial approximation to the median of an arbitrary distribution. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Estimation of Entropy in Constant Space with Improved Sample Complexity

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Andrew McGregor, Jelani Nelson, Erik Waingarten

Abstract: Recent work of Acharya et al. (NeurIPS 2019) showed how to estimate the entropy of a distribution $\mathcal D$ over an alphabet of size $k$ up to $\pmε$ additive error by streaming over $(k/ε^3) \cdot \text{polylog}(1/ε)$ i.i.d. samples and using only $O(1)$ words of memory. In this work, we give a new constant memory scheme that reduces the sample complexity to $(k/ε^2)\cdot \text{polylog}(1/ε)$.… ▽ More Recent work of Acharya et al. (NeurIPS 2019) showed how to estimate the entropy of a distribution $\mathcal D$ over an alphabet of size $k$ up to $\pmε$ additive error by streaming over $(k/ε^3) \cdot \text{polylog}(1/ε)$ i.i.d. samples and using only $O(1)$ words of memory. In this work, we give a new constant memory scheme that reduces the sample complexity to $(k/ε^2)\cdot \text{polylog}(1/ε)$. We conjecture that this is optimal up to $\text{polylog}(1/ε)$ factors. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Local Differential Privacy Is Equivalent to Contraction of $E_γ$-Divergence

Authors: Shahab Asoodeh, Maryam Aliakbarpour, Flavio P. Calmon

Abstract: We investigate the local differential privacy (LDP) guarantees of a randomized privacy mechanism via its contraction properties. We first show that LDP constraints can be equivalently cast in terms of the contraction coefficient of the $E_γ$-divergence. We then use this equivalent formula to express LDP guarantees of privacy mechanisms in terms of contraction coefficients of arbitrary $f$-divergen… ▽ More We investigate the local differential privacy (LDP) guarantees of a randomized privacy mechanism via its contraction properties. We first show that LDP constraints can be equivalently cast in terms of the contraction coefficient of the $E_γ$-divergence. We then use this equivalent formula to express LDP guarantees of privacy mechanisms in terms of contraction coefficients of arbitrary $f$-divergences. When combined with standard estimation-theoretic tools (such as Le Cam's and Fano's converse methods), this result allows us to study the trade-off between privacy and utility in several testing and minimax and Bayesian estimation problems. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2012.11035

Testing Tail Weight of a Distribution Via Hazard Rate

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Amartya Shankha Biswas, Kavya Ravichandran, Ronitt Rubinfeld

Abstract: Understanding the shape of a distribution of data is of interest to people in a great variety of fields, as it may affect the types of algorithms used for that data. We study one such problem in the framework of distribution property testing, characterizing the number of samples required to to distinguish whether a distribution has a certain property or is far from having that property. In particu… ▽ More Understanding the shape of a distribution of data is of interest to people in a great variety of fields, as it may affect the types of algorithms used for that data. We study one such problem in the framework of distribution property testing, characterizing the number of samples required to to distinguish whether a distribution has a certain property or is far from having that property. In particular, given samples from a distribution, we seek to characterize the tail of the distribution, that is, understand how many elements appear infrequently. We develop an algorithm based on a careful bucketing scheme that distinguishes light-tailed distributions from non-light-tailed ones with respect to a definition based on the hazard rate, under natural smoothness and ordering assumptions. We bound the number of samples required for this test to succeed with high probability in terms of the parameters of the problem, showing that it is polynomial in these parameters. Further, we prove a hardness result that implies that this problem cannot be solved without any assumptions. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2022; v1 submitted 6 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Rapid Approximate Aggregation with Distribution-Sensitive Interval Guarantees

Authors: Stephen Macke, Maryam Aliakbarpour, Ilias Diakonikolas, Aditya Parameswaran, Ronitt Rubinfeld

Abstract: Aggregating data is fundamental to data analytics, data exploration, and OLAP. Approximate query processing (AQP) techniques are often used to accelerate computation of aggregates using samples, for which confidence intervals (CIs) are widely used to quantify the associated error. CIs used in practice fall into two categories: techniques that are tight but not correct, i.e., they yield tight inter… ▽ More Aggregating data is fundamental to data analytics, data exploration, and OLAP. Approximate query processing (AQP) techniques are often used to accelerate computation of aggregates using samples, for which confidence intervals (CIs) are widely used to quantify the associated error. CIs used in practice fall into two categories: techniques that are tight but not correct, i.e., they yield tight intervals but only offer asymptotic guarantees, making them unreliable, or techniques that are correct but not tight, i.e., they offer rigorous guarantees, but are overly conservative, leading to confidence intervals that are too loose to be useful. In this paper, we develop a CI technique that is both correct and tighter than traditional approaches. Starting from conservative CIs, we identify two issues they often face: pessimistic mass allocation (PMA) and phantom outlier sensitivity (PHOS). By developing a novel range-trimming technique for eliminating PHOS and pairing it with known CI techniques without PMA, we develop a technique for computing CIs with strong guarantees that requires fewer samples for the same width. We implement our techniques underneath a sampling-optimized in-memory column store and show how to accelerate queries involving aggregates on a real dataset with speedups of up to 124x over traditional AQP-with-guarantees and more than 1000x over exact methods. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Testing Determinantal Point Processes

Authors: Khashayar Gatmiry, Maryam Aliakbarpour, Stefanie Jegelka

Abstract: Determinantal point processes (DPPs) are popular probabilistic models of diversity. In this paper, we investigate DPPs from a new perspective: property testing of distributions. Given sample access to an unknown distribution $q$ over the subsets of a ground set, we aim to distinguish whether $q$ is a DPP distribution, or $ε$-far from all DPP distributions in $\ell_1$-distance. In this work, we pro… ▽ More Determinantal point processes (DPPs) are popular probabilistic models of diversity. In this paper, we investigate DPPs from a new perspective: property testing of distributions. Given sample access to an unknown distribution $q$ over the subsets of a ground set, we aim to distinguish whether $q$ is a DPP distribution, or $ε$-far from all DPP distributions in $\ell_1$-distance. In this work, we propose the first algorithm for testing DPPs. Furthermore, we establish a matching lower bound on the sample complexity of DPP testing. This lower bound also extends to showing a new hardness result for the problem of testing the more general class of log-submodular distributions. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Testing Properties of Multiple Distributions with Few Samples

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Sandeep Silwal

Abstract: We propose a new setting for testing properties of distributions while receiving samples from several distributions, but few samples per distribution. Given samples from $s$ distributions, $p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_s$, we design testers for the following problems: (1) Uniformity Testing: Testing whether all the $p_i$'s are uniform or $ε$-far from being uniform in $\ell_1$-distance (2) Identity Testing:… ▽ More We propose a new setting for testing properties of distributions while receiving samples from several distributions, but few samples per distribution. Given samples from $s$ distributions, $p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_s$, we design testers for the following problems: (1) Uniformity Testing: Testing whether all the $p_i$'s are uniform or $ε$-far from being uniform in $\ell_1$-distance (2) Identity Testing: Testing whether all the $p_i$'s are equal to an explicitly given distribution $q$ or $ε$-far from $q$ in $\ell_1$-distance, and (3) Closeness Testing: Testing whether all the $p_i$'s are equal to a distribution $q$ which we have sample access to, or $ε$-far from $q$ in $\ell_1$-distance. By assuming an additional natural condition about the source distributions, we provide sample optimal testers for all of these problems. △ Less

Submitted 17 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: ITCS 2020

Testing Mixtures of Discrete Distributions

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Ravi Kumar, Ronitt Rubinfeld

Abstract: There has been significant study on the sample complexity of testing properties of distributions over large domains. For many properties, it is known that the sample complexity can be substantially smaller than the domain size. For example, over a domain of size $n$, distinguishing the uniform distribution from distributions that are far from uniform in $\ell_1$-distance uses only $O(\sqrt{n})$ sa… ▽ More There has been significant study on the sample complexity of testing properties of distributions over large domains. For many properties, it is known that the sample complexity can be substantially smaller than the domain size. For example, over a domain of size $n$, distinguishing the uniform distribution from distributions that are far from uniform in $\ell_1$-distance uses only $O(\sqrt{n})$ samples. However, the picture is very different in the presence of arbitrary noise, even when the amount of noise is quite small. In this case, one must distinguish if samples are coming from a distribution that is $ε$-close to uniform from the case where the distribution is $(1-ε)$-far from uniform. The latter task requires nearly linear in $n$ samples [Valiant 2008, Valian and Valiant 2011]. In this work, we present a noise model that on one hand is more tractable for the testing problem, and on the other hand represents a rich class of noise families. In our model, the noisy distribution is a mixture of the original distribution and noise, where the latter is known to the tester either explicitly or via sample access; the form of the noise is also known a priori. Focusing on the identity and closeness testing problems leads to the following mixture testing question: Given samples of distributions $p, q_1,q_2$, can we test if $p$ is a mixture of $q_1$ and $q_2$? We consider this general question in various scenarios that differ in terms of how the tester can access the distributions, and show that indeed this problem is more tractable. Our results show that the sample complexity of our testers are exactly the same as for the classical non-mixture case. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Appeared in COLT 2019

Towards Testing Monotonicity of Distributions Over General Posets

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Themis Gouleakis, John Peebles, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Anak Yodpinyanee

Abstract: In this work, we consider the sample complexity required for testing the monotonicity of distributions over partial orders. A distribution $p$ over a poset is monotone if, for any pair of domain elements $x$ and $y$ such that $x \preceq y$, $p(x) \leq p(y)$. To understand the sample complexity of this problem, we introduce a new property called bigness over a finite domain, where the distribution… ▽ More In this work, we consider the sample complexity required for testing the monotonicity of distributions over partial orders. A distribution $p$ over a poset is monotone if, for any pair of domain elements $x$ and $y$ such that $x \preceq y$, $p(x) \leq p(y)$. To understand the sample complexity of this problem, we introduce a new property called bigness over a finite domain, where the distribution is $T$-big if the minimum probability for any domain element is at least $T$. We establish a lower bound of $Ω(n/\log n)$ for testing bigness of distributions on domains of size $n$. We then build on these lower bounds to give $Ω(n/\log{n})$ lower bounds for testing monotonicity over a matching poset of size $n$ and significantly improved lower bounds over the hypercube poset. We give sublinear sample complexity bounds for testing bigness and for testing monotonicity over the matching poset. We then give a number of tools for analyzing upper bounds on the sample complexity of the monotonicity testing problem. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Appeared in COLT 2019

Differentially Private Identity and Closeness Testing of Discrete Distributions

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Ilias Diakonikolas, Ronitt Rubinfeld

Abstract: We investigate the problems of identity and closeness testing over a discrete population from random samples. Our goal is to develop efficient testers while guaranteeing Differential Privacy to the individuals of the population. We describe an approach that yields sample-efficient differentially private testers for these problems. Our theoretical results show that there exist private identity and… ▽ More We investigate the problems of identity and closeness testing over a discrete population from random samples. Our goal is to develop efficient testers while guaranteeing Differential Privacy to the individuals of the population. We describe an approach that yields sample-efficient differentially private testers for these problems. Our theoretical results show that there exist private identity and closeness testers that are nearly as sample-efficient as their non-private counterparts. We perform an experimental evaluation of our algorithms on synthetic data. Our experiments illustrate that our private testers achieve small type I and type II errors with sample size sublinear in the domain size of the underlying distributions. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: Submitted, May 2017

Sublinear-Time Algorithms for Counting Star Subgraphs with Applications to Join Selectivity Estimation

Authors: Maryam Aliakbarpour, Amartya Shankha Biswas, Themistoklis Gouleakis, John Peebles, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Anak Yodpinyanee

Abstract: We study the problem of estimating the value of sums of the form $S_p \triangleq \sum \binom{x_i}{p}$ when one has the ability to sample $x_i \geq 0$ with probability proportional to its magnitude. When $p=2$, this problem is equivalent to estimating the selectivity of a self-join query in database systems when one can sample rows randomly. We also study the special case when $\{x_i\}$ is the degr… ▽ More We study the problem of estimating the value of sums of the form $S_p \triangleq \sum \binom{x_i}{p}$ when one has the ability to sample $x_i \geq 0$ with probability proportional to its magnitude. When $p=2$, this problem is equivalent to estimating the selectivity of a self-join query in database systems when one can sample rows randomly. We also study the special case when $\{x_i\}$ is the degree sequence of a graph, which corresponds to counting the number of $p$-stars in a graph when one has the ability to sample edges randomly. Our algorithm for a $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$-multiplicative approximation of $S_p$ has query and time complexities $Ø(\frac{m \log \log n}{ε^2 S_p^{1/p}})$. Here, $m=\sum x_i/2$ is the number of edges in the graph, or equivalently, half the number of records in the database table. Similarly, $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph and the number of unique values in the database table. We also provide tight lower bounds (up to polylogarithmic factors) in almost all cases, even when $\{x_i\}$ is a degree sequence and one is allowed to use the structure of the graph to try to get a better estimate. We are not aware of any prior lower bounds on the problem of join selectivity estimation. For the graph problem, prior work which assumed the ability to sample only \emph{vertices} uniformly gave algorithms with matching lower bounds [Gonen, Ron, and Shavitt. \textit{SIAM J. Comput.}, 25 (2011), pp. 1365-1411]. With the ability to sample edges randomly, we show that one can achieve faster algorithms for approximating the number of star subgraphs, bypassing the lower bounds in this prior work. For example, in the regime where $S_p\leq n$, and $p=2$, our upper bound is $\tilde{O}(n/S_p^{1/2})$, in contrast to their $Ω(n/S_p^{1/3})$ lower bound when no random edge queries are available. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2016; originally announced January 2016.

Comments: 21 pages