-
Proceedings of the AI-HRI Symposium at AAAI-FSS 2022
Authors:
Zhao Han,
Emmanuel Senft,
Muneeb I. Ahmad,
Shelly Bagchi,
Amir Yazdani,
Jason R. Wilson,
Boyoung Kim,
Ruchen Wen,
Justin W. Hart,
Daniel Hernández García,
Matteo Leonetti,
Ross Mead,
Reuth Mirsky,
Ahalya Prabhakar,
Megan L. Zimmerman
Abstract:
The Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) Symposium has been a successful venue of discussion and collaboration on AI theory and methods aimed at HRI since 2014. This year, after a review of the achievements of the AI-HRI community over the last decade in 2021, we are focusing on a visionary theme: exploring the future of AI-HRI. Accordingly, we added a Blue Sky Ideas trac…
▽ More
The Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) Symposium has been a successful venue of discussion and collaboration on AI theory and methods aimed at HRI since 2014. This year, after a review of the achievements of the AI-HRI community over the last decade in 2021, we are focusing on a visionary theme: exploring the future of AI-HRI. Accordingly, we added a Blue Sky Ideas track to foster a forward-thinking discussion on future research at the intersection of AI and HRI. As always, we appreciate all contributions related to any topic on AI/HRI and welcome new researchers who wish to take part in this growing community.
With the success of past symposia, AI-HRI impacts a variety of communities and problems, and has pioneered the discussions in recent trends and interests. This year's AI-HRI Fall Symposium aims to bring together researchers and practitioners from around the globe, representing a number of university, government, and industry laboratories. In doing so, we hope to accelerate research in the field, support technology transition and user adoption, and determine future directions for our group and our research.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2022; v1 submitted 28 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Proceedings of the AI-HRI Symposium at AAAI-FSS 2020
Authors:
Shelly Bagchi,
Jason R. Wilson,
Muneeb I. Ahmad,
Christian Dondrup,
Zhao Han,
Justin W. Hart,
Matteo Leonetti,
Katrin Lohan,
Ross Mead,
Emmanuel Senft,
Jivko Sinapov,
Megan L. Zimmerman
Abstract:
The Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) Symposium has been a successful venue of discussion and collaboration since 2014. In that time, the related topic of trust in robotics has been rapidly growing, with major research efforts at universities and laboratories across the world. Indeed, many of the past participants in AI-HRI have been or are now involved with research i…
▽ More
The Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) Symposium has been a successful venue of discussion and collaboration since 2014. In that time, the related topic of trust in robotics has been rapidly growing, with major research efforts at universities and laboratories across the world. Indeed, many of the past participants in AI-HRI have been or are now involved with research into trust in HRI. While trust has no consensus definition, it is regularly associated with predictability, reliability, inciting confidence, and meeting expectations. Furthermore, it is generally believed that trust is crucial for adoption of both AI and robotics, particularly when transitioning technologies from the lab to industrial, social, and consumer applications. However, how does trust apply to the specific situations we encounter in the AI-HRI sphere? Is the notion of trust in AI the same as that in HRI? We see a growing need for research that lives directly at the intersection of AI and HRI that is serviced by this symposium. Over the course of the two-day meeting, we propose to create a collaborative forum for discussion of current efforts in trust for AI-HRI, with a sub-session focused on the related topic of explainable AI (XAI) for HRI.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2020; v1 submitted 26 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement
Authors:
David A. Robb,
Muneeb I. Ahmad,
Carlo Tiseo,
Simona Aracri,
Alistair C. McConnell,
Vincent Page,
Christian Dondrup,
Francisco J. Chiyah Garcia,
Hai-Nguyen Nguyen,
Èric Pairet,
Paola Ardón Ramírez,
Tushar Semwal,
Hazel M. Taylor,
Lindsay J. Wilson,
David Lane,
Helen Hastie,
Katrin Lohan
Abstract:
Public perceptions of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (RAI) are important in the acceptance, uptake, government regulation and research funding of this technology. Recent research has shown that the public's understanding of RAI can be negative or inaccurate. We believe effective public engagement can help ensure that public opinion is better informed. In this paper, we describe our first ite…
▽ More
Public perceptions of Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (RAI) are important in the acceptance, uptake, government regulation and research funding of this technology. Recent research has shown that the public's understanding of RAI can be negative or inaccurate. We believe effective public engagement can help ensure that public opinion is better informed. In this paper, we describe our first iteration of a high throughput in-person public engagement activity. We describe the use of a light touch quiz-format survey instrument to integrate in-the-wild research participation into the engagement, allowing us to probe both the effectiveness of our engagement strategy, and public perceptions of the future roles of robots and humans working in dangerous settings, such as in the off-shore energy sector. We critique our methods and share interesting results into generational differences within the public's view of the future of Robotics and AI in hazardous environments. These findings include that older peoples' views about the future of robots in hazardous environments were not swayed by exposure to our exhibit, while the views of younger people were affected by our exhibit, leading us to consider carefully in future how to more effectively engage with and inform older people.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Trust and Cognitive Load During Human-Robot Interaction
Authors:
Muneeb Imtiaz Ahmad,
Jasmin Bernotat,
Katrin Lohan,
Friederike Eyssel
Abstract:
This paper presents an exploratory study to understand the relationship between a humans' cognitive load, trust, and anthropomorphism during human-robot interaction. To understand the relationship, we created a \say{Matching the Pair} game that participants could play collaboratively with one of two robot types, Husky or Pepper. The goal was to understand if humans would trust the robot as a teamm…
▽ More
This paper presents an exploratory study to understand the relationship between a humans' cognitive load, trust, and anthropomorphism during human-robot interaction. To understand the relationship, we created a \say{Matching the Pair} game that participants could play collaboratively with one of two robot types, Husky or Pepper. The goal was to understand if humans would trust the robot as a teammate while being in the game-playing situation that demanded a high level of cognitive load. Using a humanoid vs. a technical robot, we also investigated the impact of physical anthropomorphism and we furthermore tested the impact of robot error rate on subsequent judgments and behavior. Our results showed that there was an inversely proportional relationship between trust and cognitive load, suggesting that as the amount of cognitive load increased in the participants, their ratings of trust decreased. We also found a triple interaction impact between robot-type, error-rate and participant's ratings of trust. We found that participants perceived Pepper to be more trustworthy in comparison with the Husky robot after playing the game with both robots under high error-rate condition. On the contrary, Husky was perceived as more trustworthy than Pepper when it was depicted as featuring a low error-rate. Our results are interesting and call further investigation of the impact of physical anthropomorphism in combination with variable error-rates of the robot.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Multi-Modal Measurements of Mental Load
Authors:
Ingo Keller,
Muneeb Imtiaz Ahmad,
Katrin Lohan
Abstract:
This position paper describes an experiment conducted to understand the relationships between different physiological measures including pupil Diameter, Blinking Rate, Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Variability in order to develop an estimation of users' mental load in real-time (see Sidebar 1). Our experiment involved performing a task to spot a correct or an incorrect word or sentence with different…
▽ More
This position paper describes an experiment conducted to understand the relationships between different physiological measures including pupil Diameter, Blinking Rate, Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Variability in order to develop an estimation of users' mental load in real-time (see Sidebar 1). Our experiment involved performing a task to spot a correct or an incorrect word or sentence with different difficulties in order to induce mental load. We briefly present the analysis of task performance and response time for the items of the experiment task.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
