Physics Playground: Insights from a Qualitative-Quantitative Study about VR-Based Learning
Authors:
Elena Battipede,
Antonella Giangualano,
Paolo Boffi,
Monica Clerici,
Alessandro Calvi,
Luca Cassenti,
Roberto Cialini,
Tristan Lieven Annemie Van Den Weghe,
Loredana Addimando,
Pier Luca Lanzi,
Alberto Gallace
Abstract:
Physics Playground is an immersive Virtual Reality (VR) application designed for educational purposes, featuring a virtual laboratory where users interact with various physics phenomena through guided experiments. This study aims to evaluate the application's design and educational content to facilitate its integration into classroom settings. A quantitative data collection investigated learning o…
▽ More
Physics Playground is an immersive Virtual Reality (VR) application designed for educational purposes, featuring a virtual laboratory where users interact with various physics phenomena through guided experiments. This study aims to evaluate the application's design and educational content to facilitate its integration into classroom settings. A quantitative data collection investigated learning outcomes, related confidence, user experience, and perceived cognitive load, through a 2x2 within-between subjects setup, with participants divided into two conditions (VR vs. slideshow) and knowledge levels assessed twice (pre- and post-tests). A qualitative approach included interviews and a focus group to explore education experts' opinions on the overall experience and didactic content. Results showed an improvement in physics knowledge and confidence after the learning experience compared to baseline, regardless of the condition. Despite comparable perceived cognitive load, slideshow learning was slightly more effective in enhancing physics knowledge. However, both qualitative and quantitative results highlighted the immersive advantage of VR in enhancing user satisfaction. This approach pointed out limitations and advantages of VR-based learning, but more research is needed to understand how it can be implemented into broader teaching strategies.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
Online search is more likely to lead students to validate true news than to refute false ones
Authors:
Azza Bouleimen,
Luca Luceri,
Felipe Cardoso,
Luca Botturi,
Martin Hermida,
Loredana Addimando,
Chiara Beretta,
Marzia Galloni,
Silvia Giordano
Abstract:
With the spread of high-speed Internet and portable smart devices, the way people access and consume information has drastically changed. However, this presents many challenges, including information overload, personal data leakage, and misinformation diffusion. Across the spectrum of risks that Internet users face nowadays, this work focuses on understanding how young people perceive and deal wit…
▽ More
With the spread of high-speed Internet and portable smart devices, the way people access and consume information has drastically changed. However, this presents many challenges, including information overload, personal data leakage, and misinformation diffusion. Across the spectrum of risks that Internet users face nowadays, this work focuses on understanding how young people perceive and deal with false information. Within an experimental campaign involving 183 students, we presented six different news items to the participants and invited them to browse the Internet to assess the veracity of the presented information. Our results suggest that online search is more likely to lead students to validate true news than to refute false ones. We found that students change their opinion about a specific piece of information more often than their global idea about a broader topic. Also, our experiment reflected that most participants rely on online sources to obtain information and access the news, and those getting information from books and Internet browsing are the most accurate in assessing the veracity of a news item. This work provides a principled understanding of how young people perceive and distinguish true and false pieces of information, identifying strengths and weaknesses amidst young subjects and contributing to building tailored digital information literacy strategies for youth.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
