How to verify the precision of density-functional-theory implementations via reproducible and universal workflows
Authors:
Emanuele Bosoni,
Louis Beal,
Marnik Bercx,
Peter Blaha,
Stefan Blügel,
Jens Bröder,
Martin Callsen,
Stefaan Cottenier,
Augustin Degomme,
Vladimir Dikan,
Kristjan Eimre,
Espen Flage-Larsen,
Marco Fornari,
Alberto Garcia,
Luigi Genovese,
Matteo Giantomassi,
Sebastiaan P. Huber,
Henning Janssen,
Georg Kastlunger,
Matthias Krack,
Georg Kresse,
Thomas D. Kühne,
Kurt Lejaeghere,
Georg K. H. Madsen,
Martijn Marsman
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In the past decades many density-functional theory methods and codes adopting periodic boundary conditions have been developed and are now extensively used in condensed matter physics and materials science research. Only in 2016, however, their precision (i.e., to which extent properties computed with different codes agree among each other) was systematically assessed on elemental crystals: a firs…
▽ More
In the past decades many density-functional theory methods and codes adopting periodic boundary conditions have been developed and are now extensively used in condensed matter physics and materials science research. Only in 2016, however, their precision (i.e., to which extent properties computed with different codes agree among each other) was systematically assessed on elemental crystals: a first crucial step to evaluate the reliability of such computations. We discuss here general recommendations for verification studies aiming at further testing precision and transferability of density-functional-theory computational approaches and codes. We illustrate such recommendations using a greatly expanded protocol covering the whole periodic table from Z=1 to 96 and characterizing 10 prototypical cubic compounds for each element: 4 unaries and 6 oxides, spanning a wide range of coordination numbers and oxidation states. The primary outcome is a reference dataset of 960 equations of state cross-checked between two all-electron codes, then used to verify and improve nine pseudopotential-based approaches. Such effort is facilitated by deploying AiiDA common workflows that perform automatic input parameter selection, provide identical input/output interfaces across codes, and ensure full reproducibility. Finally, we discuss the extent to which the current results for total energies can be reused for different goals (e.g., obtaining formation energies).
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
The road to accuracy: machine-learning-accelerated silicon ab initio simulations
Authors:
Michael Sluydts,
Michiel Larmuseau,
Johan Lauwaert,
Stefaan Cottenier
Abstract:
Ab initio simulations are capable of providing detailed information of material behavior at the nanoscale. Simulating experimentally relevant situations is, however, often computationally intense. Using hybrid approaches between ab initio methods such as density functional theory (DFT) and machine learning, new models can be constructed which retain quantum accuracy while being computationally fas…
▽ More
Ab initio simulations are capable of providing detailed information of material behavior at the nanoscale. Simulating experimentally relevant situations is, however, often computationally intense. Using hybrid approaches between ab initio methods such as density functional theory (DFT) and machine learning, new models can be constructed which retain quantum accuracy while being computationally faster by several orders of magnitude. Two examples are discussed in this paper. The first is the computational search for low energy substitutional defect complexes in silicon. The second is the construction of deep learning potentials for ab initio-level molecular dynamics simulations. The latter is applied to reproduce the 0 K equation of state and high temperature thermal expansion of Si using the same model.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
