-
On the formation of a conducting surface channel by ionic liquid gating of an insulator
Authors:
Hasan Atesci,
Francesco Coneri,
Maarten Leeuwenhoek,
Jouri Bommer,
James R. T. Seddon,
Hans Hilgenkamp,
Jan M. Van Ruitenbeek
Abstract:
Ionic liquid gating has become a popular tool for tuning the charge carrier densities of complex oxides. Among these the band insulator SrTiO$_3$ is one of the most extensively studied materials. While experiments have succeeded in inducing (super)conductivity, the process by which ionic liquid gating turns this insulator into a conductor is still under scrutiny. Recent experiments have suggested…
▽ More
Ionic liquid gating has become a popular tool for tuning the charge carrier densities of complex oxides. Among these the band insulator SrTiO$_3$ is one of the most extensively studied materials. While experiments have succeeded in inducing (super)conductivity, the process by which ionic liquid gating turns this insulator into a conductor is still under scrutiny. Recent experiments have suggested an electrochemical rather than electrostatic origin of the induced charge carriers. Here, we report experiments probing the time evolution of conduction of SrTiO$_3$ near the glass transition temperature of the ionic liquid. By cooling down to temperatures near the glass transition of the ionic liquid the process develops slowly and can be seen to evolve in time. The experiments reveal a process characterized by waiting times that can be as long as several minutes preceding a sudden appearance of conduction. For the conditions applied in our experiments we find a consistent interpretation in terms of an electrostatic mechanism for the formation of a conducting path at the surface of SrTiO$_3$. The mechanism by which the conducting surface channel develops relies on a nearly homogeneous lowering of the surface potential until the conduction band edge of SrTiO$_3$ reaches the Fermi level of the electrodes.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2018; v1 submitted 4 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Particle tracking around surface nanobubbles
Authors:
Erik Dietrich,
Harold J. W. Zandvliet,
Detlef Lohse,
James R. T. Seddon
Abstract:
The exceptionally long lifetime of surface nanobubbles remains one of the biggest questions in the field. One of the proposed mechanisms for the stability is the \emph{dynamic equilibrium} model, which describes a constant flux of gas in and out of the bubble. Here, we describe results from particle tracking experiments to measure this flow. The results are analysed by measuring the Voronoï cell s…
▽ More
The exceptionally long lifetime of surface nanobubbles remains one of the biggest questions in the field. One of the proposed mechanisms for the stability is the \emph{dynamic equilibrium} model, which describes a constant flux of gas in and out of the bubble. Here, we describe results from particle tracking experiments to measure this flow. The results are analysed by measuring the Voronoï cell size distribution, the diffusion, and speed of the tracer particles. We show that there is no detectable difference in the movement of particles above nanobubble-laden surfaces, as compared to nanobubble-free surfaces.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Surface nanobubbles: Seeing is believing
Authors:
Stefan Karpitschka,
Erik Dietrich,
James R. T. Seddon,
Harold J. W. Zandvliet,
Detlef Lohse,
Hans Riegler
Abstract:
The existence of surface nanobubbles has been previously suggested using various experimental techniques, including attenuated total reflection spectroscopy, quartz crystal microbalance, neutron reflectometry, and x-ray reflectivity, but all of these techniques provide a sole number to quantify the existence of gas over (usually) hundreds of square microns. Thus `nanobubbles' are indistinguishable…
▽ More
The existence of surface nanobubbles has been previously suggested using various experimental techniques, including attenuated total reflection spectroscopy, quartz crystal microbalance, neutron reflectometry, and x-ray reflectivity, but all of these techniques provide a sole number to quantify the existence of gas over (usually) hundreds of square microns. Thus `nanobubbles' are indistinguishable from a `uniform gassy layer' between surface and liquid. Atomic force microscopy, on the other hand, does show the existence of surface nanobubbles, but the highly intrusive nature of the technique means that a uniform gassy layer could break down into nanobubbles \textit{due to} the motion of the microscope's probe. Here we demonstrate \textit{optical} visualisation of surface nanobubbles, thus validating their individual existence non-intrusively.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
Surface bubble nucleation phase space
Authors:
James R. T. Seddon,
E. Stefan Kooij,
Bene Poelsema,
Harold J. W. Zandvliet,
Detlef Lohse
Abstract:
Recent research has revealed several different techniques for nanoscopic gas nucleation on submerged surfaces, with findings seemingly in contradiction with each other. In response to this, we have systematically investigated the occurrence of surface nanobubbles on a hydrophobised silicon substrate for various different liquid temperatures and gas concentrations, which we controlled independently…
▽ More
Recent research has revealed several different techniques for nanoscopic gas nucleation on submerged surfaces, with findings seemingly in contradiction with each other. In response to this, we have systematically investigated the occurrence of surface nanobubbles on a hydrophobised silicon substrate for various different liquid temperatures and gas concentrations, which we controlled independently. We found that nanobubbles occupy a distinct region of this phase space, occurring for gas concentrations of approximately 100-110%. Below the nanobubble phase we did not detect any gaseous formations on the substrate, whereas micropancakes (micron wide, nanometer high gaseous domains) were found at higher temperatures and gas concentrations. We moreover find that supersaturation of dissolved gases is not a requirement for nucleation of bubbles.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2010;
originally announced November 2010.
