-
Room-temperature ferromagnetism in the mixtures of the TiO2 and Co3O4 powders
Authors:
A. Serrano,
E. Fernandez Pinel,
A. Quesada,
I. Lorite,
M. Plaza,
L. Perez,
F. Jimenez-Villacorta,
J. de la Venta,
M. S. Martin-Gonzalez,
J. L. Costa-Kramer,
J. F. Fernandez,
J. Llopis,
M. A. Garcia
Abstract:
We report here the observation of ferromagnetism (FM) at 300 K in mixtures of TiO2 and Co3O4 powders despite the antiferromagnetic and diamagnetic character of both oxides respectively. The ferromagnetic behavior is found in the early stages of reaction and only for TiO2 in anatase structure; no FM is found for identical samples prepared with rutile-TiO2. Optical spectroscopy and X-ray absorptio…
▽ More
We report here the observation of ferromagnetism (FM) at 300 K in mixtures of TiO2 and Co3O4 powders despite the antiferromagnetic and diamagnetic character of both oxides respectively. The ferromagnetic behavior is found in the early stages of reaction and only for TiO2 in anatase structure; no FM is found for identical samples prepared with rutile-TiO2. Optical spectroscopy and X-ray absorption spectra confirm a surface reduction of octahedral Co+3->Co+2 in the mixtures which is in the origin of the observed magnetism
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2009;
originally announced March 2009.
-
Sources of experimental errors in the observation of nanoscale magnetism
Authors:
M. A. Garcia,
E. Fernandez Pinel,
J de la Venta,
A. Quesada,
V. Bouzas,
J. F. Fernandez,
J. J. Romero,
M. S. Martin Gonzalez,
J. L. Costa-Kramer
Abstract:
It has been recently reported that some non-magnetic materials in bulk state, exhibit magnetic behavior at the nanscale due to surface and size effects. The experimental observation of these effects is based on the measurement of very small magnetic signals. Thus, some spurious effects that are not critical for bulk materials with large magnetic signals may become important when measuring small…
▽ More
It has been recently reported that some non-magnetic materials in bulk state, exhibit magnetic behavior at the nanscale due to surface and size effects. The experimental observation of these effects is based on the measurement of very small magnetic signals. Thus, some spurious effects that are not critical for bulk materials with large magnetic signals may become important when measuring small signals (typically below 0.0001 emu). Here, we summarize some sources of these small magnetic signals that should be considered when studying this new nanomagnetism
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2009; v1 submitted 7 November, 2008;
originally announced November 2008.
-
Giant magnetic anisotropy at nanoscale: overcoming the superparamagnetic limit
Authors:
A. Hernando,
P. Crespo,
M. A. Garcia,
E. Fernandez Pinel,
A. Fernandez,
S. Penades
Abstract:
It has been recently observed for palladium and gold nanoparticles, that the magnetic moment at constant applied field does not change with temperature over the range comprised between 5 and 300 K. These samples with size smaller than 2.5 nm exhibit remanence up to room temperature. The permanent magnetism for so small samples up to so high temperatures has been explained as due to blocking of l…
▽ More
It has been recently observed for palladium and gold nanoparticles, that the magnetic moment at constant applied field does not change with temperature over the range comprised between 5 and 300 K. These samples with size smaller than 2.5 nm exhibit remanence up to room temperature. The permanent magnetism for so small samples up to so high temperatures has been explained as due to blocking of local magnetic moment by giant magnetic anisotropies. In this report we show, by analysing the anisotropy of thiol capped gold films, that the orbital momentum induced at the surface conduction electrons is crucial to understand the observed giant anisotropy. The orbital motion is driven by localised charge and/or spin through spin orbit interaction, that reaches extremely high values at the surfaces. The induced orbital moment gives rise to an effective field of the order of 103 T that is responsible of the giant anisotropy.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2006;
originally announced May 2006.
