ChemGraph: An Agentic Framework for Computational Chemistry Workflows
Authors:
Thang D. Pham,
Aditya Tanikanti,
Murat Keçeli
Abstract:
Atomistic simulations are essential tools in chemistry and materials science, accelerating the discovery of novel catalysts, energy storage materials, and pharmaceuticals. However, running these simulations remains challenging due to the wide range of computational methods, diverse software ecosystems, and the need for expert knowledge and manual effort for the setup, execution, and validation sta…
▽ More
Atomistic simulations are essential tools in chemistry and materials science, accelerating the discovery of novel catalysts, energy storage materials, and pharmaceuticals. However, running these simulations remains challenging due to the wide range of computational methods, diverse software ecosystems, and the need for expert knowledge and manual effort for the setup, execution, and validation stages. In this work, we present ChemGraph, an agentic framework powered by artificial intelligence and state-of-the-art simulation tools to streamline and automate computational chemistry and materials science workflows. ChemGraph leverages graph neural network-based foundation models for accurate yet computationally efficient calculations and large language models (LLMs) for natural language understanding, task planning, and scientific reasoning to provide an intuitive and interactive interface. Users can perform tasks such as molecular structure generation, single-point energy, geometry optimization, vibrational analysis, and thermochemistry calculations with methods ranging from tight-binding and machine learning interatomic potentials to density functional theory or wave function theory-based methods. We evaluate ChemGraph across 13 benchmark tasks and demonstrate that smaller LLMs (GPT-4o-mini, Claude-3.5-haiku, Qwen2.5-14B) perform well on simple workflows, while more complex tasks benefit from using larger models like GPT-4o. Importantly, we show that decomposing complex tasks into smaller subtasks through a multi-agent framework enables smaller LLM models to match or exceed GPT-4o's performance in specific scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
Rapid Design of Top-Performing Metal-Organic Frameworks with Qualitative Representations of Building Blocks
Authors:
Yigitcan Comlek,
Thang Duc Pham,
Randall Snurr,
Wei Chen
Abstract:
Data-driven materials design often encounters challenges where systems require or possess qualitative (categorical) information. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are an example of such material systems. The representation of MOFs through different building blocks makes it a challenge for designers to incorporate qualitative information into design optimization. Furthermore, the large number of pote…
▽ More
Data-driven materials design often encounters challenges where systems require or possess qualitative (categorical) information. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are an example of such material systems. The representation of MOFs through different building blocks makes it a challenge for designers to incorporate qualitative information into design optimization. Furthermore, the large number of potential building blocks leads to a combinatorial challenge, with millions of possible MOFs that could be explored through time consuming physics-based approaches. In this work, we integrated Latent Variable Gaussian Process (LVGP) and Multi-Objective Batch-Bayesian Optimization (MOBBO) to identify top-performing MOFs adaptively, autonomously, and efficiently without any human intervention. Our approach provides three main advantages: (i) no specific physical descriptors are required and only building blocks that construct the MOFs are used in global optimization through qualitative representations, (ii) the method is application and property independent, and (iii) the latent variable approach provides an interpretable model of qualitative building blocks with physical justification. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, we considered a design space with more than 47,000 MOF candidates. By searching only ~1% of the design space, LVGP-MOBBO was able to identify all MOFs on the Pareto front and more than 97% of the 50 top-performing designs for the CO$_2$ working capacity and CO$_2$/N$_2$ selectivity properties. Finally, we compared our approach with the Random Forest algorithm and demonstrated its efficiency, interpretability, and robustness.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
