Monitored interacting Dirac fermions
Authors:
Thomas Martin Müller,
Michael Buchhold,
Sebastian Diehl
Abstract:
We analytically study interacting Dirac fermions, described by the Thirring model, under weak local particle number measurements with monitoring rate $γ$. This system maps to a bosonic replica field theory, analyzed via the renormalization group. For a nonzero attractive interaction, a phase transition occurs at a critical measurement strength $γ_c$. When $γ>γ_c$, the system enters a localized pha…
▽ More
We analytically study interacting Dirac fermions, described by the Thirring model, under weak local particle number measurements with monitoring rate $γ$. This system maps to a bosonic replica field theory, analyzed via the renormalization group. For a nonzero attractive interaction, a phase transition occurs at a critical measurement strength $γ_c$. When $γ>γ_c$, the system enters a localized phase characterized by exponentially decaying density-density correlations beyond a finite correlation length; for $γ<γ_c$, the correlations decay algebraically. The transition is of BKT-type, reflected by a characteristic scaling of the correlation length. In the non-interacting limit, $γ_c\to0$ shifts to zero, reducing the algebraic phase to a single point in parameter space. This identifies weak measurements in the free case as an implicit double fine-tuning to the critical endpoint of the BKT phase transition. Along the non-interacting line, we compute the entanglement entropy from density-density correlation functions and find no entanglement transition at nonzero measurement strength in the thermodynamic limit.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2025; v1 submitted 4 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
How to verify the precision of density-functional-theory implementations via reproducible and universal workflows
Authors:
Emanuele Bosoni,
Louis Beal,
Marnik Bercx,
Peter Blaha,
Stefan Blügel,
Jens Bröder,
Martin Callsen,
Stefaan Cottenier,
Augustin Degomme,
Vladimir Dikan,
Kristjan Eimre,
Espen Flage-Larsen,
Marco Fornari,
Alberto Garcia,
Luigi Genovese,
Matteo Giantomassi,
Sebastiaan P. Huber,
Henning Janssen,
Georg Kastlunger,
Matthias Krack,
Georg Kresse,
Thomas D. Kühne,
Kurt Lejaeghere,
Georg K. H. Madsen,
Martijn Marsman
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In the past decades many density-functional theory methods and codes adopting periodic boundary conditions have been developed and are now extensively used in condensed matter physics and materials science research. Only in 2016, however, their precision (i.e., to which extent properties computed with different codes agree among each other) was systematically assessed on elemental crystals: a firs…
▽ More
In the past decades many density-functional theory methods and codes adopting periodic boundary conditions have been developed and are now extensively used in condensed matter physics and materials science research. Only in 2016, however, their precision (i.e., to which extent properties computed with different codes agree among each other) was systematically assessed on elemental crystals: a first crucial step to evaluate the reliability of such computations. We discuss here general recommendations for verification studies aiming at further testing precision and transferability of density-functional-theory computational approaches and codes. We illustrate such recommendations using a greatly expanded protocol covering the whole periodic table from Z=1 to 96 and characterizing 10 prototypical cubic compounds for each element: 4 unaries and 6 oxides, spanning a wide range of coordination numbers and oxidation states. The primary outcome is a reference dataset of 960 equations of state cross-checked between two all-electron codes, then used to verify and improve nine pseudopotential-based approaches. Such effort is facilitated by deploying AiiDA common workflows that perform automatic input parameter selection, provide identical input/output interfaces across codes, and ensure full reproducibility. Finally, we discuss the extent to which the current results for total energies can be reused for different goals (e.g., obtaining formation energies).
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
