Roadmap on Data-Centric Materials Science
Authors:
Stefan Bauer,
Peter Benner,
Tristan Bereau,
Volker Blum,
Mario Boley,
Christian Carbogno,
C. Richard A. Catlow,
Gerhard Dehm,
Sebastian Eibl,
Ralph Ernstorfer,
Ádám Fekete,
Lucas Foppa,
Peter Fratzl,
Christoph Freysoldt,
Baptiste Gault,
Luca M. Ghiringhelli,
Sajal K. Giri,
Anton Gladyshev,
Pawan Goyal,
Jason Hattrick-Simpers,
Lara Kabalan,
Petr Karpov,
Mohammad S. Khorrami,
Christoph Koch,
Sebastian Kokott
, et al. (36 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Science is and always has been based on data, but the terms "data-centric" and the "4th paradigm of" materials research indicate a radical change in how information is retrieved, handled and research is performed. It signifies a transformative shift towards managing vast data collections, digital repositories, and innovative data analytics methods. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) a…
▽ More
Science is and always has been based on data, but the terms "data-centric" and the "4th paradigm of" materials research indicate a radical change in how information is retrieved, handled and research is performed. It signifies a transformative shift towards managing vast data collections, digital repositories, and innovative data analytics methods. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its subset Machine Learning (ML), has become pivotal in addressing all these challenges. This Roadmap on Data-Centric Materials Science explores fundamental concepts and methodologies, illustrating diverse applications in electronic-structure theory, soft matter theory, microstructure research, and experimental techniques like photoemission, atom probe tomography, and electron microscopy. While the roadmap delves into specific areas within the broad interdisciplinary field of materials science, the provided examples elucidate key concepts applicable to a wider range of topics. The discussed instances offer insights into addressing the multifaceted challenges encountered in contemporary materials research.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2024; v1 submitted 1 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
From Prediction to Action: Critical Role of Performance Estimation for Machine-Learning-Driven Materials Discovery
Authors:
Mario Boley,
Felix Luong,
Simon Teshuva,
Daniel F Schmidt,
Lucas Foppa,
Matthias Scheffler
Abstract:
Materials discovery driven by statistical property models is an iterative decision process, during which an initial data collection is extended with new data proposed by a model-informed acquisition function--with the goal to maximize a certain "reward" over time, such as the maximum property value discovered so far. While the materials science community achieved much progress in developing proper…
▽ More
Materials discovery driven by statistical property models is an iterative decision process, during which an initial data collection is extended with new data proposed by a model-informed acquisition function--with the goal to maximize a certain "reward" over time, such as the maximum property value discovered so far. While the materials science community achieved much progress in developing property models that predict well on average with respect to the training distribution, this form of in-distribution performance measurement is not directly coupled with the discovery reward. This is because an iterative discovery process has a shifting reward distribution that is over-proportionally determined by the model performance for exceptional materials. We demonstrate this problem using the example of bulk modulus maximization among double perovskite oxides. We find that the in-distribution predictive performance suggests random forests as superior to Gaussian process regression, while the results are inverse in terms of the discovery rewards. We argue that the lack of proper performance estimation methods from pre-computed data collections is a fundamental problem for improving data-driven materials discovery, and we propose a novel such estimator that, in contrast to naïve reward estimation, successfully predicts Gaussian processes with the "expected improvement" acquisition function as the best out of four options in our demonstrational study for double perovskites. Importantly, it does so without requiring the over thousand ab initio computations that were needed to confirm this prediction.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2023; v1 submitted 27 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
