Effects of Strain and Buffer Layer on Interfacial Magnetization in Sr$_2$CrReO$_6$ Films Determined by Polarized Neutron Reflectometry
Authors:
Yaohua Liu,
J. M. Lucy,
A. Glavic,
H. Ambaye,
V. Lauter,
F. Y. Yang,
S. G. E. te Velthuis
Abstract:
We have determined the depth-resolved magnetization structures of a series of highly ordered Sr$_{2}$CrReO$_{6}$ (SCRO) ferrimagnetic epitaxial films via combined studies of x-ray reflectometry, polarized neutron reflectometry and SQUID magnetometry. The SCRO films deposited directly on (LaAlO$_3$)$_{0.3}$(Sr$_2$AlTaO$_6$)$_{0.7}$ or SrTiO$_{3}$ substrates show reduced magnetization of similar wid…
▽ More
We have determined the depth-resolved magnetization structures of a series of highly ordered Sr$_{2}$CrReO$_{6}$ (SCRO) ferrimagnetic epitaxial films via combined studies of x-ray reflectometry, polarized neutron reflectometry and SQUID magnetometry. The SCRO films deposited directly on (LaAlO$_3$)$_{0.3}$(Sr$_2$AlTaO$_6$)$_{0.7}$ or SrTiO$_{3}$ substrates show reduced magnetization of similar width near the interfaces with the substrates, despite having different degrees of strain. When the SCRO film is deposited on a Sr$_{2}$CrNbO$_{6}$ (SCNO) double perovskite buffer layer, the width the interfacial region with reduced magnetization is reduced, agreeing with an improved Cr/Re ordering. However, the relative reduction of the magnetization averaged over the interfacial regions are comparable among the three samples. Interestingly, we found that the magnetization suppression region is wider than the Cr/Re antisite disorder region at the interface between SCRO and SCNO.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2014; v1 submitted 27 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
Anomalously Weak Cooper Pair-breaking by Exchange Energy in Ferromagnet/Superconductor Bilayers
Authors:
T. R. Lemberger,
M. J. Hinton,
Jie Yong,
J. M. Lucy,
A. J. Hauser,
F. Y. Yang
Abstract:
We report the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ vs. thickness $d_F$ of Ferromagnet/Superconductor (F/S) bilayers, where F is a strong $3d$ ferromagnet (Ni, Ni$_{0.81}$Fe$_{0.19}$ (Permalloy), Co$_{0.5}$Fe$_{0.5}$) and S = Nb, taken from superfluid density measurements rather than resistivity. By regrouping the many physical parameters that appear in theory, we show that the effective ex…
▽ More
We report the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ vs. thickness $d_F$ of Ferromagnet/Superconductor (F/S) bilayers, where F is a strong $3d$ ferromagnet (Ni, Ni$_{0.81}$Fe$_{0.19}$ (Permalloy), Co$_{0.5}$Fe$_{0.5}$) and S = Nb, taken from superfluid density measurements rather than resistivity. By regrouping the many physical parameters that appear in theory, we show that the effective exchange energy is determined from the F film thickness $d_F$ where $T_c$ vs. $d_F$ begins to flatten out. Using this rearranged theory we conclude: 1) the effective exchange energy, $E_{ex}$, is about 15 times smaller than measured by ARPES and 5 times smaller than deduced in previous studies similar to ours; 2) the dirty-limit coherence length, $ΞΎ_{F}$, for Cooper pairs in F is larger than the electron mean free path, $\ell_F$; and 3) the $3d$-F/Nb interface is enough of a barrier that Cooper pairs typically must hit it several times before getting through. The Py/Nb and CoFe/Nb interfaces are more transparent than the Ni/Nb interface.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
