Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Gustafsson, D

Soft nanostructuring of YBCO Josephson Junctions by phase separation

Authors: David Gustafsson, Henrik Pettersson, Beniamino Iandolo, Eva Olsson, Thilo Bauch, Floriana Lombardi

Abstract: We have developed a new method to fabricate biepitaxial YBa2Cu3O(7-x) (YBCO) Josephson junctions at the nanoscale, allowing junctions widths down to 100 nm and simultaneously avoiding the typical damage in grain boundary interfaces due to conventional patterning procedures. By using the competition between the superconducting YBCO and the insulating Y2BaCuO5 phases during film growth, we formed na… ▽ More We have developed a new method to fabricate biepitaxial YBa2Cu3O(7-x) (YBCO) Josephson junctions at the nanoscale, allowing junctions widths down to 100 nm and simultaneously avoiding the typical damage in grain boundary interfaces due to conventional patterning procedures. By using the competition between the superconducting YBCO and the insulating Y2BaCuO5 phases during film growth, we formed nanometer sized grain boundary junctions in the insulating Y2BaCuO5 matrix as confirmed by high resolution transmission electron microscopy. Electrical transport measurements give clear indications that we are close to probing the intrinsic properties of the grain boundaries. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2011; originally announced December 2011.

Comments: 16 pages, 6 figures

Journal ref: Nano Letters, 10(12), 2010, 4824-4829

Noise properties of nanoscale YBCO Josephson junctions

Authors: David Gustafsson, Floriana Lombardi, Thilo Bauch

Abstract: We present electric noise measurements of nanoscale biepitaxial YBa2Cu3O(7-x) (YBCO) Josephson junctions fabricated by two different lithographic methods. The first (conventional) technique defines the junctions directly by ion milling etching through an amorphous carbon mask. The second (soft patterning) method makes use of the phase competition between the superconducting YBCO (Y123) and the ins… ▽ More We present electric noise measurements of nanoscale biepitaxial YBa2Cu3O(7-x) (YBCO) Josephson junctions fabricated by two different lithographic methods. The first (conventional) technique defines the junctions directly by ion milling etching through an amorphous carbon mask. The second (soft patterning) method makes use of the phase competition between the superconducting YBCO (Y123) and the insulating Y2BaCuO5 (Y211) phase at the grain boundary interface on MgO (110) substrates. The voltage noise properties of the two methods are compared in this study. For all junctions (having a thickness of 100 nm and widths of 250-500 nm) we see a significant amount of individual charge traps. We have extracted an approximate value for the effective area of the charge traps from the noise data. From the noise measurements we infer that the soft patterned junctions with a grain boundary (GB) interface manifesting a large c-axis tunneling component have a uniform barrier and a SIS like behavior. The noise properties of soft patterned junctions having a GB interface dominated by transport parallel to the ab-planes are in accordance with a resonant tunneling barrier model. The conventionally patterned junctions, instead, have suppressed superconducting transport channels with an area much less than the nominal junction area. These findings are important for the implementation of nanosized Josephson junctions in quantum circuits. △ Less

Submitted 3 December, 2011; originally announced December 2011.

Comments: 11 Pages, 10 figures

Journal ref: Physical Review B 84, 184526 (2011)

Reply to the "Comment on 'Phase diagram of an impurity in the spin-1/2 chain: two channel Kondo effect versus Curie law'"

Authors: Sebastian Eggert, David P. Gustafsson, Stefan Rommer

Abstract: In a comment by A.A. Zvyagin the phase diagram in our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 516 (2001)] was critisized of being incomplete and a new fixed point was suggested. We show that this point is in fact not a fixed point and that the phase diagram is correct as presented. In a comment by A.A. Zvyagin the phase diagram in our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 516 (2001)] was critisized of being incomplete and a new fixed point was suggested. We show that this point is in fact not a fixed point and that the phase diagram is correct as presented. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2002; originally announced October 2002.

Comments: Reply to a comment by A.A. Zvyagin. 1 page, 1 figure. The latest version in PDF format is available from http://fy.chalmers.se/~eggert/papers/reply.pdf

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 59702 (2001).

Phase diagram of an impurity in the spin-1/2 chain: two channel Kondo effect versus Curie law

Authors: Sebastian Eggert, David P. Gustafsson, Stefan Rommer

Abstract: We consider a magnetic s=1/2 impurity in the antiferromagnetic spin chain as a function of two coupling parameters: the symmetric coupling of the impurity to two sites in the chain $J_1$ and the coupling between the two sites $J_2$. By using field theory arguments and numerical calculations we can identify all possible fixed points and classify the renormalization flow between them, which leads… ▽ More We consider a magnetic s=1/2 impurity in the antiferromagnetic spin chain as a function of two coupling parameters: the symmetric coupling of the impurity to two sites in the chain $J_1$ and the coupling between the two sites $J_2$. By using field theory arguments and numerical calculations we can identify all possible fixed points and classify the renormalization flow between them, which leads to a non-trivial phase diagram. Depending on the detailed choice of the two (frustrating) coupling strengths, the stable phases correspond either to a decoupled spin with Curie law behavior or to a non-Fermi liquid fixed point with a logarithmically diverging impurity susceptibility as in the two channel Kondo effect. Our results resolve a controversy about the renormalization flow. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2000; originally announced November 2000.

Comments: 5 pages in revtex format including 4 embedded figures (using epsf). The latest version in PDF format is available from http://fy.chalmers.se/~eggert/papers/phase-diagram.pdf

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, p. 516 (2001).