-
Cutting Soft Matter: Scaling relations controlled by toughness, friction, and wear
Authors:
Bharath Antarvedi Goda,
Zhenwei Ma,
Stefano Fregonese,
Mattia Bacca
Abstract:
Cutting mechanics of soft solids is gaining rapid attention thanks to its promising benefits in material characterization and other applications. However, a full understanding of the physical phenomena is still missing, and several questions remain outstanding. E.g.: How can we directly and reliably measure toughness from cutting experiments? What is the role of blade sharpness? In this paper, we…
▽ More
Cutting mechanics of soft solids is gaining rapid attention thanks to its promising benefits in material characterization and other applications. However, a full understanding of the physical phenomena is still missing, and several questions remain outstanding. E.g.: How can we directly and reliably measure toughness from cutting experiments? What is the role of blade sharpness? In this paper, we explore the simple problem of wire cutting, where blade sharpness is only defined by the wire radius. Through finite element analysis, we obtain a simple scaling relation between the wire radius and the steady-state cutting force per unit sample thickness. The cutting force is independent of the wire radius if the latter is below a transition length, while larger radii produce a linear force-radius correlation. The minimum cutting force, for small radii, is given by cleavage toughness, i.e., the surface energy required to break covalent bonds in the crack plane. The force-radius slope is instead given by the wear shear strength in the material. Via cutting experiments on polyacrylamide gels, we find that the magnitude of shear strength is close to the work of fracture of the material, i.e., the critical strain energy density required to break a pristine sample in uniaxial tension. The work of fracture characterizes the toughening contribution from the fracture process zone (FPZ), which adds to cleavage toughness. Our study provides two important messages, that answer the above questions: Toughness can be estimated from wire-cutting experiments from the intercept of the force-radius linear correlation, as previously explored. However, as we discovered, this only estimates cleavage toughness. Additionally, the force-radius slope is correlated with the work of fracture, giving an estimation of the dissipative contributions from the FPZ.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Cutting Mechanics of Soft Compressible Solids: Force-radius scaling versus bulk modulus
Authors:
Bharath Antarvedi Goda,
Mattia Bacca
Abstract:
Cutting mechanics in soft solids present a complex mechanical challenge due to the intricate behavior of soft ductile materials as they undergo crack nucleation and propagation. Recent research has explored the relationship between the cutting force needed to continuously cut a soft material and the radius of the wire (blade). A typical simplifying assumption is that of material incompressibility,…
▽ More
Cutting mechanics in soft solids present a complex mechanical challenge due to the intricate behavior of soft ductile materials as they undergo crack nucleation and propagation. Recent research has explored the relationship between the cutting force needed to continuously cut a soft material and the radius of the wire (blade). A typical simplifying assumption is that of material incompressibility, albeit no material in nature is really incompressible. In this study, we relax this assumption and examine how material (in)compressibility influences the correlation between cutting forces and material properties like toughness and modulus. The ratio μ/\k{appa}, where μ and \k{appa} are the shear and bulk moduli, indicates the material's degree of compressibility, where incompressible materials have μ/\k{appa}=0, and larger μ/\k{appa} provide higher volumetric compressibility. Following previous observations, we obtain two cutting regimes: (i) high toughness or small wire radius, and (ii) low toughness or large wire radius. Regime (i) is dominated by frictional dissipation, while regime (ii) is dominated by adhesive debonding and/or the wear resistance of the material. These regimes are controlled by the ratio between the wire radius and the elasto-cohesive length of the material: the critical crack opening displacement at fast fracture under uniaxial tension. In the large radius, regime (ii), our theoretical findings reveal that incompressible materials require larger forces. Notably, however, the elasto-cohesive length of the material, defining the transition wire radius between regimes (i) and (ii), is larger for compressible materials, which are therefore more likely to be cut in regime (i), and thus requiring larger cutting forces.
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
Making the cut: end effects and the benefits of slicing
Authors:
Bharath Antarvedi Goda,
David Labonte,
Mattia Bacca
Abstract:
Cutting mechanics in soft solids have been a subject of study for several decades, an interest fuelled by the multitude of its applications, including material testing, manufacturing, and biomedical technology. Wire cutting is the simplest model system to analyze the cutting resistance of a soft material. However, even for this simple system, the complex failure mechanisms that underpin cutting ar…
▽ More
Cutting mechanics in soft solids have been a subject of study for several decades, an interest fuelled by the multitude of its applications, including material testing, manufacturing, and biomedical technology. Wire cutting is the simplest model system to analyze the cutting resistance of a soft material. However, even for this simple system, the complex failure mechanisms that underpin cutting are still not completely understood. Several models that connect the critical cutting force to the radius of the wire and the key mechanical properties of the cut material have been proposed. An almost ubiquitous simplifying assumption is a state of plane (and anti-plane) strain in the material. In this paper, we show that this assumption can lead to erroneous conclusions because even such a simple cutting problem is essentially three-dimensional. A planar approximation restricts the analysis to the stress distribution in the mid-plane. However, through finite element modeling, we reveal that the maximal tensile stress - and thus the likely location of cut initiation - is in fact located in the front plane. Friction reduces the magnitude of this stress, but this detrimental effect can be counteracted by large slice-to-push (shear-to-indentation) ratios. The introduction of these end effects helps reconcile a recent controversy around the role of friction in wire cutting, for it implies that slicing can indeed reduce required cutting forces, but only if the slice-push ratio and the friction coefficient are sufficiently large. Material strain-stiffening reduces the critical indentation depth required to initiate the cut further and thus needs to be considered when cutting non-linearly elastic materials.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.