Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Dolbow, J E

On the effects of material strength in dynamic fracture: A phase-field study

Authors: Yangyuanchen Liu, Oscar Lopez-Pamies, John E. Dolbow

Abstract: Over the past seven years, full-field analyses of a wide range of classical as well as modern quasi-static fracture experiments on nominally elastic brittle materials -- ranging from hard ceramics to soft elastomers -- have repeatedly identified the material strength surface as one of the key material properties that governs not only the nucleation of cracks, but also their propagation. Central to… ▽ More Over the past seven years, full-field analyses of a wide range of classical as well as modern quasi-static fracture experiments on nominally elastic brittle materials -- ranging from hard ceramics to soft elastomers -- have repeatedly identified the material strength surface as one of the key material properties that governs not only the nucleation of cracks, but also their propagation. Central to these analyses are the results generated by the Griffith phase-field fracture theory with material strength introduced in [21,23,20]. The first of two objectives of this paper is to extend this theory to account for inertia, this for the basic case of isotropic linear elastic brittle materials. From an applications point of view, the theory amounts to solving an initial-boundary-value problem comprised of a hyperbolic PDE coupled with an elliptic PDE for the displacement field $\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{X},t)$ and the phase field $d(\mathbf{X},t)$. A robust scheme is presented to generate solutions for these equations that is based on an adaptive finite-element discretization of space and an implicit finite-difference discretization of time. %At every time increment $t_m$, the resulting discretized equations are solved separately in a staggered manner for $\mathbf{u}(\mathbf{X},t_m)$ and $d(\mathbf{X},t_m)$ by means of Newton-Raphson schemes. The second objective is to illustrate the descriptive and predictive capabilities of the proposed theory via simulations of benchmark problems and experiments. These include problems involving fracture nucleation from large pre-existing cracks, such as the classical Kalthoff-Winkler experiments, as well as problems involving fracture nucleation within the bulk, such as the dynamic Brazilian fracture experiments. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

Nucleation of fracture: The first-octant evidence against classical variational phase-field models

Authors: Farhad Kamarei, John E. Dolbow, Oscar Lopez-Pamies

Abstract: As a companion work to [1], this Note presents a series of simple formulae and explicit results that illustrate and highlight why classical variational phase-field models cannot possibly predict fracture nucleation in elastic brittle materials. The focus is on ``tension-dominated'' problems where all principal stresses are non-negative, that is, problems taking place entirely within the first octa… ▽ More As a companion work to [1], this Note presents a series of simple formulae and explicit results that illustrate and highlight why classical variational phase-field models cannot possibly predict fracture nucleation in elastic brittle materials. The focus is on ``tension-dominated'' problems where all principal stresses are non-negative, that is, problems taking place entirely within the first octant in the space of principal stresses. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2024; v1 submitted 1 November, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

Classical variational phase-field models cannot predict fracture nucleation

Authors: Oscar Lopez-Pamies, John E. Dolbow, Gilles A. Francfort, Christopher J. Larsen

Abstract: Notwithstanding the evidence against them, classical variational phase-field models continue to be used and pursued in an attempt to describe fracture nucleation in elastic brittle materials. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the existing evidence against such a class of models as descriptors of fracture nucleation. To that end, a review is f… ▽ More Notwithstanding the evidence against them, classical variational phase-field models continue to be used and pursued in an attempt to describe fracture nucleation in elastic brittle materials. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the existing evidence against such a class of models as descriptors of fracture nucleation. To that end, a review is first given of the plethora of experimental observations of fracture nucleation in nominally elastic brittle materials under quasi-static loading conditions, as well as of classical variational phase-field models, without and with energy splits. These models are then confronted with the experimental observations. The conclusion is that they cannot possibly describe fracture nucleation in general. This because classical variational phase-field models cannot account for material strength as an independent macroscopic material property. The last part of the paper includes a brief summary of a class of phase-field models that can describe fracture nucleation. It also provides a discussion of how pervasively material strength has been overlooked in the analysis of fracture at large, as well as an outlook into the modeling of fracture nucleation beyond the basic setting of elastic brittle materials. △ Less

Submitted 30 August, 2024; originally announced September 2024.

A Griffith description of fracture for non-monotonic loading with application to fatigue

Authors: Subhrangsu Saha, John E. Dolbow, Oscar Lopez-Pamies

Abstract: With the fundamental objective of establishing the universality of the Griffith energy competition to describe the growth of large cracks in solids \emph{not} just under monotonic but under general loading conditions, this paper puts forth a generalization of the classical Griffith energy competition in nominally elastic brittle materials to arbitrary \emph{non-monotonic} quasistatic loading condi… ▽ More With the fundamental objective of establishing the universality of the Griffith energy competition to describe the growth of large cracks in solids \emph{not} just under monotonic but under general loading conditions, this paper puts forth a generalization of the classical Griffith energy competition in nominally elastic brittle materials to arbitrary \emph{non-monotonic} quasistatic loading conditions, which include monotonic and cyclic loadings as special cases. Centered around experimental observations, the idea consists in: $i$) viewing the critical energy release rate $\mathcal{G}_c$ \emph{not} as a material constant but rather as a material function of both space $\textbf{X}$ and time $t$, $ii$) one that decreases in value as the loading progresses, this solely within a small region $Ω_\ell(t)$ around crack fronts, with the characteristic size $\ell$ of such a region being material specific, and $iii$) with the decrease in value of $\mathcal{G}_c$ being dependent on the history of the elastic fields in $Ω_\ell(t)$. By construction, the proposed Griffith formulation is able to describe any Paris-law behavior of the growth of large cracks in nominally elastic brittle materials for the limiting case when the loading is cyclic. For the opposite limiting case when the loading is monotonic, the formulation reduces to the classical Griffith formulation. Additional properties of the proposed formulation are illustrated via a parametric analysis and direct comparisons with representative fatigue fracture experiments on a ceramic, mortar, and PMMA. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

A variational formulation of Griffith phase-field fracture with material strength

Authors: C. J. Larsen, J. E. Dolbow, O. Lopez-Pamies

Abstract: In this expository Note, it is shown that the Griffith phase-field theory of fracture accounting for material strength originally introduced by Kumar, Francfort, and Lopez-Pamies (J Mech Phys Solids 112, 523--551, 2018) in the form of PDEs can be recast as a variational theory. In particular, the solution pair $(\textbf{u},v)$ defined by the PDEs for the displacement field $\textbf{u}$ and the pha… ▽ More In this expository Note, it is shown that the Griffith phase-field theory of fracture accounting for material strength originally introduced by Kumar, Francfort, and Lopez-Pamies (J Mech Phys Solids 112, 523--551, 2018) in the form of PDEs can be recast as a variational theory. In particular, the solution pair $(\textbf{u},v)$ defined by the PDEs for the displacement field $\textbf{u}$ and the phase field $v$ is shown to correspond to the fields that minimize separately two different functionals, much like the solution pair $(\textbf{u},v)$ defined by the original phase-field theory of fracture without material strength implemented in terms of alternating minimization. The merits of formulating a complete theory of fracture nucleation and propagation via such a variational approach -- in terms of the minimization of two different functionals -- are discussed. △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

A Variational Phase-Field Model For Ductile Fracture with Coalescence Dissipation

Authors: Tianchen Hu, Brandon Talamini, Andrew J. Stershic, Michael R. Tupek, John E. Dolbow

Abstract: A novel phase-field for ductile fracture model is presented. The model is developed within a consistent variational framework in the context of finite-deformation kinematics. A novel coalescence dissipation introduces a new coupling mechanism between plasticity and fracture by degrading the fracture toughness as the equivalent plastic strain increases. The proposed model is compared with a recent… ▽ More A novel phase-field for ductile fracture model is presented. The model is developed within a consistent variational framework in the context of finite-deformation kinematics. A novel coalescence dissipation introduces a new coupling mechanism between plasticity and fracture by degrading the fracture toughness as the equivalent plastic strain increases. The proposed model is compared with a recent alternative where plasticity and fracture are strongly coupled. Several representative numerical examples motivate specific modeling choices. In particular, a linear crack geometric function provides an "unperturbed" ductile response prior to crack initiation, and Lorentz-type degradation functions ensure that the critical fracture strength remains independent of the phase-field regularization length. In addition, the response of the model is demonstrated to converge with a vanishing phase-field regularization length. The model is then applied to calibrate and simulate a three-point bending experiment of an aluminum specimen with a complex geometry. The effect of the proposed coalescence dissipation coupling on simulations of the experiment is first investigated in a two-dimensional plane strain setting. The calibrated model is then applied to a three-dimensional calculation, where the calculated load-deflection curves and the crack trajectory show excellent agreement with experimental observations. Finally, the model is applied to simulate crack nucleation and growth in a specimen from a recent Sandia Fracture Challenge. △ Less

Submitted 10 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Influence of surface tension in the surfactant-driven fracture of closely-packed particulate monolayers

Authors: Christian Peco, Wei Chen, Yingjie Liu, M. M. Bandi, John E. Dolbow, Eliot Fried

Abstract: A phase-field model is used to capture the surfactant-driven formation of fracture patterns in particulate monolayers. The model is intended for the regime of closely-packed systems in which the mechanical response of the monolayer can be approximated as a linearly elastic solid. The model approximates the loss in tensile strength of the monolayer as the surfactant concentration increases through… ▽ More A phase-field model is used to capture the surfactant-driven formation of fracture patterns in particulate monolayers. The model is intended for the regime of closely-packed systems in which the mechanical response of the monolayer can be approximated as a linearly elastic solid. The model approximates the loss in tensile strength of the monolayer as the surfactant concentration increases through the evolution of a damage field. Initial-boundary value problems are constructed and spatially discretized with finite element approximations to the displacement and surfactant damage fields. A comparison between model-based simulations and existing experimental observations indicates a qualitative match in both the fracture patterns and temporal scaling of the fracture process. The importance of surface tension differences is quantified by means of a dimensionless parameter, revealing thresholds that separate different regimes of fracture. These findings are supported by newly performed experiments that validate the model and demonstrate the strong sensitivity of the fracture pattern to differences in surface tension. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2017; v1 submitted 27 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Comments: 10 pages, 11 figures, and 3 tables