Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Chantelot, P

Drop impact on superheated surfaces: from capillary dominance to non-linear advection dominance

Authors: Pierre Chantelot, Detlef Lohse

Abstract: Ambient air cushions the impact of drops on solid substrates, an effect usually revealed by the entrainment of a bubble, trapped as the air squeezed under the drop drains and liquid-solid contact occurs. The presence of air becomes evident for impacts on very smooth surfaces, where the gas film can be sustained, allowing drops to bounce without wetting the substrate. In such a non-wetting situatio… ▽ More Ambient air cushions the impact of drops on solid substrates, an effect usually revealed by the entrainment of a bubble, trapped as the air squeezed under the drop drains and liquid-solid contact occurs. The presence of air becomes evident for impacts on very smooth surfaces, where the gas film can be sustained, allowing drops to bounce without wetting the substrate. In such a non-wetting situation, Mandre & Brenner (2012) numerically and theoretically evidenced that two physical mechanisms can act to prevent contact: surface tension and non-linear advection. However, the advection dominated regime has remained hidden in experiments as liquid-solid contact prevents to realize rebounds at sufficiently large impact velocities. By performing impacts on superheated surfaces, in the so-called dynamical Leidenfrost regime Tran et al. (2012), we enable drop rebound at higher impact velocities, allowing us to reveal this regime. Using high-speed total internal reflection, we measure the minimal gas film thickness under impacting drops, and provide evidence for the transition from the surface tension to the non-linear inertia dominated regime. We rationalise our measurements through scaling relationships derived by coupling the liquid and gas dynamics, in the presence of evaporation. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2023; v1 submitted 23 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

When does an impacting drop stop bouncing?

Authors: Vatsal Sanjay, Pierre Chantelot, Detlef Lohse

Abstract: Non-wetting substrates allow impacting liquid drops to spread, recoil, and takeoff, provided they are not too heavy (Biance et al. 2006) or too viscous (Jha et al. 2020). In this article, using direct numerical simulations with the volume of fluid method, we investigate how viscous stresses and gravity conspire against capillarity to inhibit drop rebound. Close to the bouncing to non-bouncing tran… ▽ More Non-wetting substrates allow impacting liquid drops to spread, recoil, and takeoff, provided they are not too heavy (Biance et al. 2006) or too viscous (Jha et al. 2020). In this article, using direct numerical simulations with the volume of fluid method, we investigate how viscous stresses and gravity conspire against capillarity to inhibit drop rebound. Close to the bouncing to non-bouncing transition, we evidence that the initial spreading stage can be decoupled from the later retraction and takeoff, allowing to understand the rebound as a process converting the surface energy of the spread liquid into kinetic energy. Drawing an analogy with coalescence induced jumping, we propose a criterion for the transition from the bouncing to the non-bouncing regime, namely by the condition $Oh_c + Bo_c \sim 1$, where $Oh_c$ and $Bo_c$ are the Ohnesorge number and Bond number at the transition, respectively. This criterion is in excellent agreement with the numerical results. We also elucidate the mechanisms of bouncing inhibition in the heavy and viscous drops limiting regimes by calculating the energy budgets and relating them to the drop's shape and internal flow. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2022; v1 submitted 11 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: Supplemental videos are available here: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf5C5HCrvhLHG5t3iPscUuEp_gbD4XHyU

Drop impact on viscous liquid films

Authors: Vatsal Sanjay, Srinath Lakshman, Pierre Chantelot, Jacco H. Snoeijer, Detlef Lohse

Abstract: When a liquid drop falls on a solid substrate, the air layer in between them delays the occurrence of liquid--solid contact. For impacts on smooth substrates, the air film can even prevent wetting, allowing the drop to bounce off with dynamics identical to that observed for impacts on superamphiphobic materials. In this article, we investigate similar bouncing phenomena, occurring on viscous liqui… ▽ More When a liquid drop falls on a solid substrate, the air layer in between them delays the occurrence of liquid--solid contact. For impacts on smooth substrates, the air film can even prevent wetting, allowing the drop to bounce off with dynamics identical to that observed for impacts on superamphiphobic materials. In this article, we investigate similar bouncing phenomena, occurring on viscous liquid films, that mimic atomically smooth substrates, with the goal to probe their effective repellency. We elucidate the mechanisms associated to the bouncing to non-bouncing (floating) transition using experiments, simulations, and a minimal model that predicts the main characteristics of drop impact, the contact time, and the coefficient of restitution. In the case of highly viscous or very thin films, the impact dynamics is not affected by the presence of the viscous film. Within this substrate--independent limit, bouncing is suppressed once the drop viscosity exceeds a critical value as on superamphiphobic substrates. For thicker or less viscous films, both the drop and film properties influence the rebound dynamics and conspire to inhibit bouncing above a critical film thickness. This substrate--dependent regime also admits a limit, for low viscosity drops, in which the film properties alone determine the limits of repellency. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: Please find the supplemental videos here: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf5C5HCrvhLHJXLqwpylEwYc2rVtTsCUX

How capillarity affects the propagation of elastic waves in soft gels

Authors: P. Chantelot, L. Domino, A. Eddi

Abstract: Elastic waves propagating at the interface of soft solids can be altered by the presence of external forces such as capillarity or gravity. We measure the dispersion relation of waves at the free surface of agarose gels with great accuracy, revealing the existence of multiple modes as well as an apparent dispersion. We disentangle the role of capillarity and elasticity by considering the 3D nature… ▽ More Elastic waves propagating at the interface of soft solids can be altered by the presence of external forces such as capillarity or gravity. We measure the dispersion relation of waves at the free surface of agarose gels with great accuracy, revealing the existence of multiple modes as well as an apparent dispersion. We disentangle the role of capillarity and elasticity by considering the 3D nature of mechanical waves, achieving quantitative agreement between theoretical predictions and experiments. Notably, our results show that capillarity plays an important role for wavenumbers much smaller than expected from balancing elastic and capillary forces. We further confirm the efficiency of our approach by including the effect of gravity in our predictions and quantitatively comparing it to experiments. △ Less

Submitted 21 March, 2020; v1 submitted 19 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. E 101, 032609 (2020)

Drop Trampoline

Authors: Pierre Chantelot, Martin Coux, Christophe Clanet, David Quéré

Abstract: Rigid superhydrophobic materials have the ability to repel millimetric water drops, in typically 10 ms. Yet, most natural water-repellent materials can be deformed by impacting drops. To test the effect of deformability, we perform impacts of non-wetting drops onto thin ($\sim$ 10 \micro m), circular PDMS membranes. The bouncing mechanism is markedly modified compared to that on a rigid material:… ▽ More Rigid superhydrophobic materials have the ability to repel millimetric water drops, in typically 10 ms. Yet, most natural water-repellent materials can be deformed by impacting drops. To test the effect of deformability, we perform impacts of non-wetting drops onto thin ($\sim$ 10 \micro m), circular PDMS membranes. The bouncing mechanism is markedly modified compared to that on a rigid material: the liquid leaves the substrate as it is kicked upwards by the membrane. We show that the rebound is controlled by an interplay between the dynamics of the drop and that of the soft substrate, so that we can continuously vary the contact time by playing on the membrane's characteristics and reduce it up to 70\%. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2018; v1 submitted 9 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.