-
Catastrophic rupture of lunar rocks: Implications for lunar rock size-frequency distributions
Authors:
O. Ruesch,
R. M. Marshal,
W. Iqbal,
J. H. Pasckert,
C. H. van der Bogert,
M. Patzek
Abstract:
Like many airless planetary surfaces, the surface of the Moon is scattered by populations of blocks and smaller boulders. These features decrease in abundance with increasing exposure time due to comminution by impact bombardment and produce regolith. Here we model the evolution of block size-frequency distributions by updating the model of Hoerz et al. (1975) with new input functions: the size-fr…
▽ More
Like many airless planetary surfaces, the surface of the Moon is scattered by populations of blocks and smaller boulders. These features decrease in abundance with increasing exposure time due to comminution by impact bombardment and produce regolith. Here we model the evolution of block size-frequency distributions by updating the model of Hoerz et al. (1975) with new input functions: the size-frequency distributions of cm-scale meteoroids observed over the last few tens of years and a rock impact shattering function. The impact shattering function is calibrated using measurements of a lunar block size-frequency distribution of known age. We find that cumulative block size-frequency distributions change with time from a power-law for young populations (<~50 Myr) to an exponential distribution for older populations. The new destruction rates are within the uncertainty of the original model, although, for sizes >5 cm, two times faster than the original best estimate. The faster rates are broadly consistent with observations reported by other studies. Since the input functions are known for small rock sizes, the rock abundance can be determined theoretically at sizes below the current image spatial resolution (0.5 m). Surface exposure age of block fields can be estimated together with the initial block abundance from the measurement of block size-frequency distributions.
△ Less
Submitted 27 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
In Situ Geochronology for the Next Decade: Mission Designs for the Moon, Mars, and Vesta
Authors:
Barbara A. Cohen,
Kelsey E. Young,
Nicolle E. B. Zellner,
Kris Zacny,
R. Aileen Yingst,
Ryan N. Watkins,
Richard Warwick,
Sarah N. Valencia,
Timothy D. Swindle,
Stuart J. Robbins,
Noah E. Petro,
Anthony Nicoletti,
Daniel P. Moriarty, III,
Richard Lynch,
Stephen J. Indyk,
Juliane Gross,
Jennifer A. Grier,
John A. Grant,
Amani Ginyard,
Caleb I. Fassett,
Kenneth A. Farley,
Benjamin J. Farcy,
Bethany L. Ehlmann,
M. Darby Dyar,
Gerard Daelemans
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Geochronology, or determination of absolute ages for geologic events, underpins many inquiries into the formation and evolution of planets and our Solar System. Absolute ages of ancient and recent magmatic products provide strong constraints on the dynamics of magma oceans and crustal formation, as well as the longevity and evolution of interior heat engines and distinct mantle/crustal source regi…
▽ More
Geochronology, or determination of absolute ages for geologic events, underpins many inquiries into the formation and evolution of planets and our Solar System. Absolute ages of ancient and recent magmatic products provide strong constraints on the dynamics of magma oceans and crustal formation, as well as the longevity and evolution of interior heat engines and distinct mantle/crustal source regions. Absolute dating also relates habitability markers to the timescale of evolution of life on Earth. However, the number of geochronologically-significant terrains across the inner Solar System far exceeds our ability to conduct sample return from all of them. In preparation for the upcoming Decadal Survey, our team formulated a set of medium-class (New Frontiers) mission concepts to three different locations (the Moon, Mars, and Vesta) where sites that record Solar System bombardment, magmatism, and/or habitability are uniquely preserved and accessible. We developed a notional payload to directly date planetary surfaces, consisting of two instruments capable of measuring radiometric ages in situ, an imaging spectrometer, optical cameras to provide site geologic context and sample characterization, a trace element analyzer to augment sample contextualization, and a sample acquisition and handling system. Landers carrying this payload to the Moon, Mars, and Vesta would likely fit into the New Frontiers cost cap in our study (~$1B). A mission of this type would provide crucial constraints on planetary history while also enabling a broad suite of investigations such as basic geologic characterization, geomorphologic analysis, ground truth for remote sensing analyses, analyses of major, minor, trace, and volatile elements, atmospheric and other long-lived monitoring, organic molecule analyses, and soil and geotechnical properties.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Geological Mapping and Chronology of Lunar Landing Sites: Apollo 11
Authors:
Wajiha Iqbal,
Harald Hiesinger,
Carolyn H. van der Bogert
Abstract:
Crater size-frequency distribution (CSFDs) measurements allow the derivation of absolute model ages (AMAs) for geological units across various terrestrial bodies in the Solar System based on body-specific adjustments to the lunar chronology (e.g., Hartmann, 1970; Neukum et al., 1975, 1983, 2001; Stoeffler et al., 2001, 2006; Hiesinger et al., 2012; Robbins, 2014). Thus, it is important to revisit…
▽ More
Crater size-frequency distribution (CSFDs) measurements allow the derivation of absolute model ages (AMAs) for geological units across various terrestrial bodies in the Solar System based on body-specific adjustments to the lunar chronology (e.g., Hartmann, 1970; Neukum et al., 1975, 1983, 2001; Stoeffler et al., 2001, 2006; Hiesinger et al., 2012; Robbins, 2014). Thus, it is important to revisit and test the accuracy of the lunar chronology using data from recent lunar missions (e.g., Hiesinger et al., 2000, 2012, 2015; Rajmon and Spudis, 2004; Stoeffler et al., 2006), as well as newer analyses of lunar samples (e.g., Gaffney et al. 2011, Meyer, 2012; Snape et al., 2016; Welsh et al., 2018). We generated a new detailed geological map of the Apollo 11 landing region based on spectral characteristics, topography, and albedo maps, which shows several mare units adjacent to the lunar module. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) images were used to measure new CSFDs and derive the cumulative number of craters with diameters greater than or equal to 1 km or N(1) for the Apollo 11 landing site. The newly derived N(1) values are consistent with the presence of only one surficial unit at the landing site: the Group A, High-K (high potassium) young mare basalt (Meyer, 2012). We reviewed the radiometric ages for Apollo 11 samples that have been determined since the calibration of the lunar cratering chronology, used our new geological map to reinterpret their provenance, and correlated them with the new N(1) values. These are plotted and compared with the lunar chronology of Neukum et al. (1983). Our calibration point for the Apollo 11 landing site is consistent with the earlier values, thus, confirming Neukum's (1983) lunar chronology curve.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
