-
Supernova Pointing Capabilities of DUNE
Authors:
DUNE Collaboration,
A. Abed Abud,
B. Abi,
R. Acciarri,
M. A. Acero,
M. R. Adames,
G. Adamov,
M. Adamowski,
D. Adams,
M. Adinolfi,
C. Adriano,
A. Aduszkiewicz,
J. Aguilar,
B. Aimard,
F. Akbar,
K. Allison,
S. Alonso Monsalve,
M. Alrashed,
A. Alton,
R. Alvarez,
T. Alves,
H. Amar,
P. Amedo,
J. Anderson,
D. A. Andrade
, et al. (1340 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The determination of the direction of a stellar core collapse via its neutrino emission is crucial for the identification of the progenitor for a multimessenger follow-up. A highly effective method of reconstructing supernova directions within the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) is introduced. The supernova neutrino pointing resolution is studied by simulating and reconstructing electr…
▽ More
The determination of the direction of a stellar core collapse via its neutrino emission is crucial for the identification of the progenitor for a multimessenger follow-up. A highly effective method of reconstructing supernova directions within the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) is introduced. The supernova neutrino pointing resolution is studied by simulating and reconstructing electron-neutrino charged-current absorption on $^{40}$Ar and elastic scattering of neutrinos on electrons. Procedures to reconstruct individual interactions, including a newly developed technique called ``brems flipping'', as well as the burst direction from an ensemble of interactions are described. Performance of the burst direction reconstruction is evaluated for supernovae happening at a distance of 10 kpc for a specific supernova burst flux model. The pointing resolution is found to be 3.4 degrees at 68% coverage for a perfect interaction-channel classification and a fiducial mass of 40 kton, and 6.6 degrees for a 10 kton fiducial mass respectively. Assuming a 4% rate of charged-current interactions being misidentified as elastic scattering, DUNE's burst pointing resolution is found to be 4.3 degrees (8.7 degrees) at 68% coverage.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Searching for solar KDAR with DUNE
Authors:
DUNE Collaboration,
A. Abed Abud,
B. Abi,
R. Acciarri,
M. A. Acero,
M. R. Adames,
G. Adamov,
D. Adams,
M. Adinolfi,
A. Aduszkiewicz,
J. Aguilar,
Z. Ahmad,
J. Ahmed,
B. Ali-Mohammadzadeh,
T. Alion,
K. Allison,
S. Alonso Monsalve,
M. Alrashed,
C. Alt,
A. Alton,
P. Amedo,
J. Anderson,
C. Andreopoulos,
M. Andreotti,
M. P. Andrews
, et al. (1157 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The observation of 236 MeV muon neutrinos from kaon-decay-at-rest (KDAR) originating in the core of the Sun would provide a unique signature of dark matter annihilation. Since excellent angle and energy reconstruction are necessary to detect this monoenergetic, directional neutrino flux, DUNE with its vast volume and reconstruction capabilities, is a promising candidate for a KDAR neutrino search.…
▽ More
The observation of 236 MeV muon neutrinos from kaon-decay-at-rest (KDAR) originating in the core of the Sun would provide a unique signature of dark matter annihilation. Since excellent angle and energy reconstruction are necessary to detect this monoenergetic, directional neutrino flux, DUNE with its vast volume and reconstruction capabilities, is a promising candidate for a KDAR neutrino search. In this work, we evaluate the proposed KDAR neutrino search strategies by realistically modeling both neutrino-nucleus interactions and the response of DUNE. We find that, although reconstruction of the neutrino energy and direction is difficult with current techniques in the relevant energy range, the superb energy resolution, angular resolution, and particle identification offered by DUNE can still permit great signal/background discrimination. Moreover, there are non-standard scenarios in which searches at DUNE for KDAR in the Sun can probe dark matter interactions.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2021; v1 submitted 19 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Supernova Neutrino Burst Detection with the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment
Authors:
DUNE collaboration,
B. Abi,
R. Acciarri,
M. A. Acero,
G. Adamov,
D. Adams,
M. Adinolfi,
Z. Ahmad,
J. Ahmed,
T. Alion,
S. Alonso Monsalve,
C. Alt,
J. Anderson,
C. Andreopoulos,
M. P. Andrews,
F. Andrianala,
S. Andringa,
A. Ankowski,
M. Antonova,
S. Antusch,
A. Aranda-Fernandez,
A. Ariga,
L. O. Arnold,
M. A. Arroyave,
J. Asaadi
, et al. (949 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), a 40-kton underground liquid argon time projection chamber experiment, will be sensitive to the electron-neutrino flavor component of the burst of neutrinos expected from the next Galactic core-collapse supernova. Such an observation will bring unique insight into the astrophysics of core collapse as well as into the properties of neutrinos. The gen…
▽ More
The Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), a 40-kton underground liquid argon time projection chamber experiment, will be sensitive to the electron-neutrino flavor component of the burst of neutrinos expected from the next Galactic core-collapse supernova. Such an observation will bring unique insight into the astrophysics of core collapse as well as into the properties of neutrinos. The general capabilities of DUNE for neutrino detection in the relevant few- to few-tens-of-MeV neutrino energy range will be described. As an example, DUNE's ability to constrain the $ν_e$ spectral parameters of the neutrino burst will be considered.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2021; v1 submitted 15 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
The 2015 Summer Solstice Storm: one of the major geomagnetic storms of solar cycle 24 observed at ground level
Authors:
C. R. A. Augusto,
C. E. Navia,
M. N. de Oliveira,
A. A. Nepomuceno,
J. P. Raulin,
E. Tueros,
R. R. de Mendonça,
A. C. Fauth,
H. Vieira de Souza,
V. Kopenkin,
T. Sinzi
Abstract:
We report on the 22-23 June 2015 geomagnetic storm. There has been a shortage of intense geomagnetic storms during the current solar cycle 24 in relation to the previous cycle. This situation changed after mid-June 2015 when one of the biggest solar active regions (AR 2371) of current solar cycle 24, close to the central meridian produced several coronal mass ejections (CMEs) associated with M-cla…
▽ More
We report on the 22-23 June 2015 geomagnetic storm. There has been a shortage of intense geomagnetic storms during the current solar cycle 24 in relation to the previous cycle. This situation changed after mid-June 2015 when one of the biggest solar active regions (AR 2371) of current solar cycle 24, close to the central meridian produced several coronal mass ejections (CMEs) associated with M-class flares. The CMEs impact on the Earth's magnetosphere resulted in a moderately-severe G4-class geomagnetic storm on 22-23 June 2015 and a G2 (moderate) geomagnetic storms on 24 June. The G4 solstice storm was the second biggest (so far) geomagnetic storms of cycle 24. We highlight the ground level observations made by New-Tupi, Muonca and the CARPET El Leoncito cosmic ray detectors that are located within the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) region. These observations are studied in correlation with data obtained by space-borne detectors and other ground-based experiments. The CME designations are from the Computer Aided CME Tracking (CACTus) automated catalog. As expected, Forbush Decreases (FD) associated with the passing CMEs were recorded by these detectors. We noticed a peculiar feature linked to a severe geomagnetic storm event. The 21 June 2015 CME 0091 was likely associated with the 22 June summer solstice FD event. The angular width of CME 0091 was very narrow and measured 56 degrees seen from Earth. In most cases, only CME halos and partial halos, lead to severe geomagnetic storms. We performed a cross-check analysis of the FD events detected during the rise phase of the current solar cycle 24, the geomagnetic parameters, and the CACTus CME catalog. Our study suggests that narrow angular-width CMEs that erupt in the western region of the ecliptic plane can lead to moderate and severe geomagnetic storms.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2018; v1 submitted 14 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.