-
The Science Performance of JWST as Characterized in Commissioning
Authors:
Jane Rigby,
Marshall Perrin,
Michael McElwain,
Randy Kimble,
Scott Friedman,
Matt Lallo,
René Doyon,
Lee Feinberg,
Pierre Ferruit,
Alistair Glasse,
Marcia Rieke,
George Rieke,
Gillian Wright,
Chris Willott,
Knicole Colon,
Stefanie Milam,
Susan Neff,
Christopher Stark,
Jeff Valenti,
Jim Abell,
Faith Abney,
Yasin Abul-Huda,
D. Scott Acton,
Evan Adams,
David Adler
, et al. (601 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper characterizes the actual science performance of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), as determined from the six month commissioning period. We summarize the performance of the spacecraft, telescope, science instruments, and ground system, with an emphasis on differences from pre-launch expectations. Commissioning has made clear that JWST is fully capable of achieving the discoveries f…
▽ More
This paper characterizes the actual science performance of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), as determined from the six month commissioning period. We summarize the performance of the spacecraft, telescope, science instruments, and ground system, with an emphasis on differences from pre-launch expectations. Commissioning has made clear that JWST is fully capable of achieving the discoveries for which it was built. Moreover, almost across the board, the science performance of JWST is better than expected; in most cases, JWST will go deeper faster than expected. The telescope and instrument suite have demonstrated the sensitivity, stability, image quality, and spectral range that are necessary to transform our understanding of the cosmos through observations spanning from near-earth asteroids to the most distant galaxies.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023; v1 submitted 12 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
A Model for Data Citation in Astronomical Research using Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs)
Authors:
Jenny Novacescu,
Joshua E. G. Peek,
Sarah Weissman,
Scott W. Fleming,
Karen Levay,
Elizabeth Fraser
Abstract:
Standardizing and incentivizing the use of digital object identifiers (DOIs) to aggregate and identify both data analyzed and data generated by a research project will advance the field of astronomy to match best practices in other research fields like geosciences and medicine. Increase in the use of DOIs will prepare the discipline for changing expectations among funding agencies and publishers,…
▽ More
Standardizing and incentivizing the use of digital object identifiers (DOIs) to aggregate and identify both data analyzed and data generated by a research project will advance the field of astronomy to match best practices in other research fields like geosciences and medicine. Increase in the use of DOIs will prepare the discipline for changing expectations among funding agencies and publishers, who increasingly expect accurate and thorough data citation to accompany scientific outputs. The use of DOIs ensures a robust, sustainable, and interoperable approach to data citation in which due credit is given to researchers and institutions who produce and maintain the primary data. We describe in this work the advantages of DOIs for data citation and best practices for integrating a DOI service in an astronomical archive. We report on a pilot project carried out in collaboration with AAS Journals. During the course of the 1.5 year pilot, over 75% of submitting authors opted to use the integrated DOI service to clearly identify data analyzed during their research project when prompted at the time of paper submission.
△ Less
Submitted 28 December, 2017;
originally announced January 2018.
-
The Proposal Auto-Categorizer and Manager for Time Allocation Review at Space Telescope Science Institute
Authors:
Louis-Gregory Strolger,
Sophia Porter,
Jill Lagerstrom,
Sarah Weissman,
I. Neill Reid,
Michael Garcia
Abstract:
The Proposal Auto-Categorizer and Manager (PACMan) tool was written to respond to concerns on subjective flaws and potential biases in some aspects of the proposal review process for time allocation for the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} (HST), and to partially alleviate some of the anticipated additional workload from the {\it James Webb Space Telescope} (JWST) proposal review. PACMan is essentiall…
▽ More
The Proposal Auto-Categorizer and Manager (PACMan) tool was written to respond to concerns on subjective flaws and potential biases in some aspects of the proposal review process for time allocation for the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} (HST), and to partially alleviate some of the anticipated additional workload from the {\it James Webb Space Telescope} (JWST) proposal review. PACMan is essentially a mixed-method Naive Bayesian spam filtering routine, with multiple pools representing scientific categories, that utilizes the Robinson method for combining token (or word) probabilities. PACMan was trained to make similar programmatic decisions in science category sorting, panelist selection, and proposal-to-panelists assignments to those made by individuals and committees in the Science Policies Group (SPG) at Space Telescope Science Institute. Based on training from the previous cycle's proposals, PACMan made the same science category assignments for proposals in Cycle 24 as did the SPG, an average of 87\% of the time. Tests for similar science categorizations, based on training using proposals from additional cycles, show that this accuracy can be further improved, to the $>95\%$ level. This tool will be used to augment or replace key functions in the TAC review processes in future HST and JWST cycles.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
