-
Probing gravity with non-linear clustering in redshift space
Authors:
C. Viglione,
P. Fosalba,
I. Tutusaus,
L. Blot,
J. Carretero,
P. Tallada,
F. Castander
Abstract:
We present the first computation of the gravity model testing parameter $E_G$ on realistic simulated modified gravity galaxy mocks. The analysis is conducted using two twin simulations presented in arXiv:1805.09824(1): one based on general relativity (GR) and the other on the $f(R)$ Hu $\&$ Sawicki model with $f=10^{-5}$ (F5). This study aims to measure the $E_G$ estimator in GR and $f(R)$ models…
▽ More
We present the first computation of the gravity model testing parameter $E_G$ on realistic simulated modified gravity galaxy mocks. The analysis is conducted using two twin simulations presented in arXiv:1805.09824(1): one based on general relativity (GR) and the other on the $f(R)$ Hu $\&$ Sawicki model with $f=10^{-5}$ (F5). This study aims to measure the $E_G$ estimator in GR and $f(R)$ models using high-fidelity simulated galaxy catalogs, with the goal of assessing how future galaxy surveys can detect deviations from standard gravity. Deriving this estimator requires precise, unbiased measurements of the growth rate of structure and the linear galaxy bias. We achieve this by implementing an end-to-end cosmological analysis pipeline in configuration space, using the multipoles of the 2-point correlation function. Our analysis demonstrates how to measure the scale-dependent growth rate predicted by non-standard gravity models. We split the estimation of the RSD $β$ parameter over distinct scale ranges, separating large (quasi-linear) and small (non-linear) scales. We show that this estimator can be accurately measured using mock galaxies in low redshift bins ($z < 1$), where it offers strong discriminating power over competing gravity theories. We find that, for an all-sky galaxy survey and neglecting observational systematics, accurate and largely unbiased estimations of $E_G$ can be obtained across all redshifts. However, the error bars are too large to clearly distinguish between the theories. When measuring the scale-dependence of the $E_G$ estimator, we note that state-of-the-art theory modeling limitations and intrinsic "prior volume effects" prevent high-accuracy constraints. Alternatively, we propose a null test of gravity using RSD clustering, which, if small scales are modeled accurately in future surveys, could detect significant departures from GR.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2025; v1 submitted 7 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Euclid: Relativistic effects in the dipole of the 2-point correlation function
Authors:
F. Lepori,
S. Schulz,
I. Tutusaus,
M. -A. Breton,
S. Saga,
C. Viglione,
J. Adamek,
C. Bonvin,
L. Dam,
P. Fosalba,
L. Amendola,
S. Andreon,
C. Baccigalupi,
M. Baldi,
S. Bardelli,
D. Bonino,
E. Branchini,
M. Brescia,
J. Brinchmann,
A. Caillat,
S. Camera,
V. Capobianco,
C. Carbone,
J. Carretero,
S. Casas
, et al. (108 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gravitational redshift and Doppler effects give rise to an antisymmetric component of the galaxy correlation function when cross-correlating two galaxy populations or two different tracers. In this paper, we assess the detectability of these effects in the Euclid spectroscopic galaxy survey. We model the impact of gravitational redshift on the observed redshift of galaxies in the Flagship mock cat…
▽ More
Gravitational redshift and Doppler effects give rise to an antisymmetric component of the galaxy correlation function when cross-correlating two galaxy populations or two different tracers. In this paper, we assess the detectability of these effects in the Euclid spectroscopic galaxy survey. We model the impact of gravitational redshift on the observed redshift of galaxies in the Flagship mock catalogue using a Navarro-Frenk-White profile for the host haloes. We isolate these relativistic effects, largely subdominant in the standard analysis, by splitting the galaxy catalogue into two populations of faint and bright objects and estimating the dipole of their cross-correlation in four redshift bins. In the simulated catalogue, we detect the dipole signal on scales below $30\,h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$, with detection significances of $4\,σ$ and $3\,σ$ in the two lowest redshift bins, respectively. At higher redshifts, the detection significance drops below $2\,σ$. Overall, we estimate the total detection significance in the Euclid spectroscopic sample to be approximately $6\,σ$. We find that on small scales, the major contribution to the signal comes from the nonlinear gravitational potential. Our study on the Flagship mock catalogue shows that this observable can be detected in Euclid Data Release 2 and beyond.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Euclid. V. The Flagship galaxy mock catalogue: a comprehensive simulation for the Euclid mission
Authors:
Euclid Collaboration,
F. J. Castander,
P. Fosalba,
J. Stadel,
D. Potter,
J. Carretero,
P. Tallada-Crespí,
L. Pozzetti,
M. Bolzonella,
G. A. Mamon,
L. Blot,
K. Hoffmann,
M. Huertas-Company,
P. Monaco,
E. J. Gonzalez,
G. De Lucia,
C. Scarlata,
M. -A. Breton,
L. Linke,
C. Viglione,
S. -S. Li,
Z. Zhai,
Z. Baghkhani,
K. Pardede,
C. Neissner
, et al. (344 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the Flagship galaxy mock, a simulated catalogue of billions of galaxies designed to support the scientific exploitation of the Euclid mission. Euclid is a medium-class mission of the European Space Agency optimised to determine the properties of dark matter and dark energy on the largest scales of the Universe. It probes structure formation over more than 10 billion years primarily from…
▽ More
We present the Flagship galaxy mock, a simulated catalogue of billions of galaxies designed to support the scientific exploitation of the Euclid mission. Euclid is a medium-class mission of the European Space Agency optimised to determine the properties of dark matter and dark energy on the largest scales of the Universe. It probes structure formation over more than 10 billion years primarily from the combination of weak gravitational lensing and galaxy clustering data. The breath of Euclid's data will also foster a wide variety of scientific analyses. The Flagship simulation was developed to provide a realistic approximation to the galaxies that will be observed by Euclid and used in its scientific analyses. We ran a state-of-the-art N-body simulation with four trillion particles, producing a lightcone on the fly. From the dark matter particles, we produced a catalogue of 16 billion haloes in one octant of the sky in the lightcone up to redshift z=3. We then populated these haloes with mock galaxies using a halo occupation distribution and abundance matching approach, calibrating the free parameters of the galaxy mock against observed correlations and other basic galaxy properties. Modelled galaxy properties include luminosity and flux in several bands, redshifts, positions and velocities, spectral energy distributions, shapes and sizes, stellar masses, star formation rates, metallicities, emission line fluxes, and lensing properties. We selected a final sample of 3.4 billion galaxies with a magnitude cut of H_E<26, where we are complete. We have performed a comprehensive set of validation tests to check the similarity to observational data and theoretical models. In particular, our catalogue is able to closely reproduce the main characteristics of the weak lensing and galaxy clustering samples to be used in the mission's main cosmological analysis. (abridged)
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Authors:
Euclid Collaboration,
Y. Mellier,
Abdurro'uf,
J. A. Acevedo Barroso,
A. Achúcarro,
J. Adamek,
R. Adam,
G. E. Addison,
N. Aghanim,
M. Aguena,
V. Ajani,
Y. Akrami,
A. Al-Bahlawan,
A. Alavi,
I. S. Albuquerque,
G. Alestas,
G. Alguero,
A. Allaoui,
S. W. Allen,
V. Allevato,
A. V. Alonso-Tetilla,
B. Altieri,
A. Alvarez-Candal,
S. Alvi,
A. Amara
, et al. (1115 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The current standard model of cosmology successfully describes a variety of measurements, but the nature of its main ingredients, dark matter and dark energy, remains unknown. Euclid is a medium-class mission in the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) that will provide high-resolution optical imaging, as well as near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy, over about 14…
▽ More
The current standard model of cosmology successfully describes a variety of measurements, but the nature of its main ingredients, dark matter and dark energy, remains unknown. Euclid is a medium-class mission in the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) that will provide high-resolution optical imaging, as well as near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy, over about 14,000 deg^2 of extragalactic sky. In addition to accurate weak lensing and clustering measurements that probe structure formation over half of the age of the Universe, its primary probes for cosmology, these exquisite data will enable a wide range of science. This paper provides a high-level overview of the mission, summarising the survey characteristics, the various data-processing steps, and data products. We also highlight the main science objectives and expected performance.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2024; v1 submitted 22 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Euclid Preparation. TBD. Impact of magnification on spectroscopic galaxy clustering
Authors:
Euclid Collaboration,
G. Jelic-Cizmek,
F. Sorrenti,
F. Lepori,
C. Bonvin,
S. Camera,
F. J. Castander,
R. Durrer,
P. Fosalba,
M. Kunz,
L. Lombriser,
I. Tutusaus,
C. Viglione,
Z. Sakr,
N. Aghanim,
A. Amara,
S. Andreon,
M. Baldi,
S. Bardelli,
C. Bodendorf,
D. Bonino,
E. Branchini,
M. Brescia,
J. Brinchmann,
V. Capobianco
, et al. (204 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we investigate the impact of lensing magnification on the analysis of Euclid's spectroscopic survey, using the multipoles of the 2-point correlation function for galaxy clustering. We determine the impact of lensing magnification on cosmological constraints, and the expected shift in the best-fit parameters if magnification is ignored. We consider two cosmological analyses: i) a full…
▽ More
In this paper we investigate the impact of lensing magnification on the analysis of Euclid's spectroscopic survey, using the multipoles of the 2-point correlation function for galaxy clustering. We determine the impact of lensing magnification on cosmological constraints, and the expected shift in the best-fit parameters if magnification is ignored. We consider two cosmological analyses: i) a full-shape analysis based on the $Λ$CDM model and its extension $w_0w_a$CDM and ii) a model-independent analysis that measures the growth rate of structure in each redshift bin. We adopt two complementary approaches in our forecast: the Fisher matrix formalism and the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. The fiducial values of the local count slope (or magnification bias), which regulates the amplitude of the lensing magnification, have been estimated from the Euclid Flagship simulations. We use linear perturbation theory and model the 2-point correlation function with the public code coffe. For a $Λ$CDM model, we find that the estimation of cosmological parameters is biased at the level of 0.4-0.7 standard deviations, while for a $w_0w_a$CDM dynamical dark energy model, lensing magnification has a somewhat smaller impact, with shifts below 0.5 standard deviations. In a model-independent analysis aiming to measure the growth rate of structure, we find that the estimation of the growth rate is biased by up to $1.2$ standard deviations in the highest redshift bin. As a result, lensing magnification cannot be neglected in the spectroscopic survey, especially if we want to determine the growth factor, one of the most promising ways to test general relativity with Euclid. We also find that, by including lensing magnification with a simple template, this shift can be almost entirely eliminated with minimal computational overhead.
△ Less
Submitted 6 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Euclid preparation: XIX. Impact of magnification on photometric galaxy clustering
Authors:
F. Lepori,
I. Tutusaus,
C. Viglione,
C. Bonvin,
S. Camera,
F. J. Castander,
R. Durrer,
P. Fosalba,
G. Jelic-Cizmek,
M. Kunz,
J. Adamek,
S. Casas,
M. Martinelli,
Z. Sakr,
D. Sapone,
A. Amara,
N. Auricchio,
C. Bodendorf,
D. Bonino,
E. Branchini,
M. Brescia,
J. Brinchmann,
V. Capobianco,
C. Carbone,
J. Carretero
, et al. (161 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We investigate the importance of lensing magnification for estimates of galaxy clustering and its cross-correlation with shear for the photometric sample of Euclid. Using updated specifications, we study the impact of lensing magnification on the constraints and the shift in the estimation of the best fitting cosmological parameters that we expect if this effect is neglected. We follow the prescri…
▽ More
We investigate the importance of lensing magnification for estimates of galaxy clustering and its cross-correlation with shear for the photometric sample of Euclid. Using updated specifications, we study the impact of lensing magnification on the constraints and the shift in the estimation of the best fitting cosmological parameters that we expect if this effect is neglected. We follow the prescriptions of the official Euclid Fisher matrix forecast for the photometric galaxy clustering analysis and the combination of photometric clustering and cosmic shear. The slope of the luminosity function (local count slope), which regulates the amplitude of the lensing magnification, and the galaxy bias have been estimated from the Euclid Flagship simulation.We find that magnification significantly affects both the best-fit estimation of cosmological parameters and the constraints in the galaxy clustering analysis of the photometric sample. In particular, including magnification in the analysis reduces the 1$σ$ errors on $Ω_{\text{m},0}, w_{0}, w_a$ at the level of 20-35%, depending on how well we will be able to independently measure the local count slope. In addition, we find that neglecting magnification in the clustering analysis leads to shifts of up to 1.6$σ$ in the best-fit parameters. In the joint analysis of galaxy clustering, cosmic shear, and galaxy-galaxy lensing, magnification does not improve precision, but it leads to an up to 6$σ$ bias if neglected. Therefore, for all models considered in this work, magnification has to be included in the analysis of galaxy clustering and its cross-correlation with the shear signal ($3\times2$pt analysis) for an accurate parameter estimation.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2022; v1 submitted 11 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
