-
WINTER on S250206dm: A near-infrared search for an electromagnetic counterpart
Authors:
Danielle Frostig,
Viraj R. Karambelkar,
Robert D. Stein,
Nathan P. Lourie,
Mansi M. Kasliwal,
Robert A. Simcoe,
Mattia Bulla,
Tomas Ahumada,
Geoffrey Mo,
Josiah Purdum,
Jill Juneau,
Andrew Malonis,
Gabor Furesz
Abstract:
We present near-infrared follow-up observations of the International Gravitational Wave Network (IGWN) event S250206dm with the Wide-Field Infrared Transient Explorer (WINTER). WINTER is a near-infrared time-domain survey designed for electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational-wave sources localized to $\leq$300 deg$^{2}$. The instrument's wide field of view (1.2 deg$^2$), dedicated 1-m robotic te…
▽ More
We present near-infrared follow-up observations of the International Gravitational Wave Network (IGWN) event S250206dm with the Wide-Field Infrared Transient Explorer (WINTER). WINTER is a near-infrared time-domain survey designed for electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational-wave sources localized to $\leq$300 deg$^{2}$. The instrument's wide field of view (1.2 deg$^2$), dedicated 1-m robotic telescope, and near-infrared coverage (0.9-1.7 microns) are optimized for searching for kilonovae, which are expected to exhibit a relatively long-lived near-infrared component. S250206dm is the only neutron star merger in the fourth observing run (to date) localized to $\leq$300 deg$^{2}$ with a False Alarm Rate below one per year. It has a $55\%$ probability of being a neutron star-black hole (NSBH) merger and a $37\%$ probability of being a binary neutron star (BNS) merger, with a $50\%$ credible region spanning 38 deg$^2$, an estimated distance of 373 Mpc, and an overall false alarm rate of approximately one in 25 years. WINTER covered $43\%$ of the probability area at least once and $35\%$ at least three times. Through automated and human candidate vetting, all transient candidates found in WINTER coverage were rejected as kilonova candidates. Unsurprisingly, given the large estimated distance of 373 Mpc, the WINTER upper limits do not constrain kilonova models. This study highlights the promise of systematic infrared searches and the need for future wider and deeper infrared surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Searching for gravitational wave optical counterparts with the Zwicky Transient Facility: summary of O4a
Authors:
Tomás Ahumada,
Shreya Anand,
Michael W. Coughlin,
Vaidehi Gupta,
Mansi M. Kasliwal,
Viraj R. Karambelkar,
Robert D. Stein,
Gaurav Waratkar,
Vishwajeet Swain,
Theophile Jegou du Laz,
Akash Anumarlapudi,
Igor Andreoni,
Mattia Bulla,
Gokul P. Srinivasaragavan,
Andrew Toivonen,
Avery Wold,
Eric C. Bellm,
S. Bradley Cenko,
David L. Kaplan,
Jesper Sollerman,
Varun Bhalerao,
Daniel Perley,
Anirudh Salgundi,
Aswin Suresh,
K-Ryan Hinds
, et al. (27 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
During the first half of the fourth observing run (O4a) of the International Gravitational Wave Network (IGWN), the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) conducted a systematic search for kilonova (KN) counterparts to binary neutron star (BNS) and neutron star-black hole (NSBH) merger candidates. Here, we present a comprehensive study of the five high-significance (FAR < 1 per year) BNS and NSBH candida…
▽ More
During the first half of the fourth observing run (O4a) of the International Gravitational Wave Network (IGWN), the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) conducted a systematic search for kilonova (KN) counterparts to binary neutron star (BNS) and neutron star-black hole (NSBH) merger candidates. Here, we present a comprehensive study of the five high-significance (FAR < 1 per year) BNS and NSBH candidates in O4a. Our follow-up campaigns relied on both target-of-opportunity observations (ToO) and re-weighting of the nominal survey schedule to maximize coverage. We describe the toolkit we have been developing, Fritz, an instance of SkyPortal, instrumental in coordinating and managing our telescope scheduling, candidate vetting, and follow-up observations through a user-friendly interface. ZTF covered a total of 2841 deg$^2$ within the skymaps of the high-significance GW events, reaching a median depth of g~20.2 mag. We circulated 15 candidates, but found no viable KN counterpart to any of the GW events. Based on the ZTF non-detections of the high-significance events in O4a, we used a Bayesian approach, nimbus, to quantify the posterior probability of KN model parameters that are consistent with our non-detections. Our analysis favors KNe with initial absolute magnitude fainter than -16 mag. The joint posterior probability of a GW170817-like KN associated with all our O4a follow-ups was 64%. Additionally, we use a survey simulation software, simsurvey, to determine that our combined filtered efficiency to detect a GW170817-like KN is 36%, when considering the 5 confirmed astrophysical events in O3 (1 BNS and 4 NSBH), along with our O4a follow-ups. Following Kasliwal et al. (2020), we derived joint constraints on the underlying KN luminosity function based on our O3 and O4a follow-ups, determining that no more than 76% of KNe fading at 1 mag/day can peak at a magnitude brighter than -17.5 mag.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Resolving the explosion of supernova 2023ixf in Messier 101 within its complex circumstellar environment
Authors:
E. A. Zimmerman,
I. Irani,
P. Chen,
A. Gal-Yam,
S. Schulze,
D. A. Perley,
J. Sollerman,
A. V. Filippenko,
T. Shenar,
O. Yaron,
S. Shahaf,
R. J. Bruch,
E. O. Ofek,
A. De Cia,
T. G. Brink,
Y. Yang,
S. S. Vasylyev,
S. Ben Ami,
M. Aubert,
A. Badash,
J. S. Bloom,
P. J. Brown,
K. De,
G. Dimitriadis,
C. Fransson
, et al. (32 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Observing a supernova explosion shortly after it occurs can reveal important information about the physics of stellar explosions and the nature of the progenitor stars of supernovae (SNe). When a star with a well-defined edge explodes in vacuum, the first photons to escape from its surface appear as a brief shock-breakout flare. The duration of this flare can extend to at most a few hours even for…
▽ More
Observing a supernova explosion shortly after it occurs can reveal important information about the physics of stellar explosions and the nature of the progenitor stars of supernovae (SNe). When a star with a well-defined edge explodes in vacuum, the first photons to escape from its surface appear as a brief shock-breakout flare. The duration of this flare can extend to at most a few hours even for nonspherical breakouts from supergiant stars, after which the explosion ejecta should expand and cool. Alternatively, for stars exploding within a distribution of sufficiently dense optically thick circumstellar material, the first photons escape from the material beyond the stellar edge, and the duration of the initial flare can extend to several days, during which the escaping emission indicates photospheric heating. The difficulty in detecting SN explosions promptly after the event has so far limited data regarding supergiant stellar explosions mostly to serendipitous observations that, owing to the lack of ultraviolet (UV) data, were unable to determine whether the early emission is heating or cooling, and hence the nature of the early explosion event. Here, we report observations of SN 2023ixf in the nearby galaxy M101, covering the early days of the event. Using UV spectroscopy from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) as well as a comprehensive set of additional multiwavelength observations, we trace the photometric and spectroscopic evolution of the event and are able to temporally resolve the emergence and evolution of the SN emission.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2024; v1 submitted 16 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
A very luminous jet from the disruption of a star by a massive black hole
Authors:
Igor Andreoni,
Michael W. Coughlin,
Daniel A. Perley,
Yuhan Yao,
Wenbin Lu,
S. Bradley Cenko,
Harsh Kumar,
Shreya Anand,
Anna Y. Q. Ho,
Mansi M. Kasliwal,
Antonio de Ugarte Postigo,
Ana Sagues-Carracedo,
Steve Schulze,
D. Alexander Kann,
S. R. Kulkarni,
Jesper Sollerman,
Nial Tanvir,
Armin Rest,
Luca Izzo,
Jean J. Somalwar,
David L. Kaplan,
Tomas Ahumada,
G. C. Anupama,
Katie Auchettl,
Sudhanshu Barway
, et al. (56 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Tidal disruption events (TDEs) are bursts of electromagnetic energy released when supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the centers of galaxies violently disrupt a star that passes too close. TDEs provide a new window to study accretion onto SMBHs; in some rare cases, this accretion leads to launching of a relativistic jet, but the necessary conditions are not fully understood. The best studied jett…
▽ More
Tidal disruption events (TDEs) are bursts of electromagnetic energy released when supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the centers of galaxies violently disrupt a star that passes too close. TDEs provide a new window to study accretion onto SMBHs; in some rare cases, this accretion leads to launching of a relativistic jet, but the necessary conditions are not fully understood. The best studied jetted TDE to date is Swift J1644+57, which was discovered in gamma-rays, but was too obscured by dust to be seen at optical wavelengths. Here we report the optical discovery of AT2022cmc, a rapidly fading source at cosmological distance (redshift z=1.19325) whose unique lightcurve transitioned into a luminous plateau within days. Observations of a bright counterpart at other wavelengths, including X-rays, sub-millimeter, and radio, supports the interpretation of AT2022cmc as a jetted TDE containing a synchrotron "afterglow", likely launched by a SMBH with spin $a \gtrsim 0.3$. Using 4 years of Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) survey data, we calculate a rate of $0.02 ^{+ 0.04 }_{- 0.01 }$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ for on-axis jetted TDEs based on the luminous, fast-fading red component, thus providing a measurement complementary to the rates derived from X-ray and radio observations. Correcting for the beaming angle effects, this rate confirms that about 1% of TDEs have relativistic jets. Optical surveys can use AT2022cmc as a prototype to unveil a population of jetted TDEs.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.