Mass measurements of $^{60-63}$Ga reduce x-ray burst model uncertainties and extend the evaluated $T=1$ isobaric multiplet mass equation
Authors:
S. F. Paul,
J. Bergmann,
J. D. Cardona,
K. A. Dietrich,
E. Dunling,
Z. Hockenbery,
C. Hornung,
C. Izzo,
A. Jacobs,
A. Javaji,
B. Kootte,
Y. Lan,
E. Leistenschneider,
E. M. Lykiardopoulou,
I. Mukul,
T. Murböck,
W. S. Porter,
R. Silwal,
M. B. Smith,
J. Ringuette,
T. Brunner,
T. Dickel,
I. Dillmann,
G. Gwinner,
M. MacCormick
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report precision mass measurements of neutron-deficient gallium isotopes approaching the proton drip line. The measurements of $^{60-63}$Ga performed with the TITAN multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer provide a more than threefold improvement over the current literature mass uncertainty of $^{61}$Ga and mark the first direct mass measurement of $^{60}$Ga. The improved precision…
▽ More
We report precision mass measurements of neutron-deficient gallium isotopes approaching the proton drip line. The measurements of $^{60-63}$Ga performed with the TITAN multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer provide a more than threefold improvement over the current literature mass uncertainty of $^{61}$Ga and mark the first direct mass measurement of $^{60}$Ga. The improved precision of the $^{61}$Ga mass has important implications for the astrophysical rp process, as it constrains essential reaction Q-values near the $^{60}$Zn waiting point. Based on calculations with a one-zone model, we demonstrate the impact of the improved mass data on prediction uncertainties of X-ray burst models. The first-time measurement of the $^{60}$Ga ground-state mass establishes the proton-bound nature of this nuclide; thus, constraining the location of the proton drip line along this isotopic chain. Including the measured mass of $^{60}$Ga further enables us to extend the evaluated $T=1$ isobaric multiplet mass equation up to $A=60$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2021; v1 submitted 24 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
EBIT Observation of Ar Dielectronic Recombination Lines Near the Unknown Faint X-Ray Feature Found in the Stacked Spectrum of Galaxy Clusters
Authors:
Amy C. Gall,
Adam R. Foster,
Roshani Silwal,
Joan M. Dreiling,
Alexander Borovik Jr.,
Ethan Kilgore,
Marco Ajello,
John D. Gillaspy,
Yuri Ralchenko,
Endre Takacs
Abstract:
Motivated by possible atomic origins of the unidentified emission line detected at 3.55 keV to 3.57 keV in a stacked spectrum of galaxy clusters (Bulbul et al. 2014), an electron beam ion trap (EBIT) was used to investigate the resonant dielectronic recombination (DR) process in highly-charged argon ions as a possible contributor to the emission feature. The He-like Ar DR-induced transition 1s…
▽ More
Motivated by possible atomic origins of the unidentified emission line detected at 3.55 keV to 3.57 keV in a stacked spectrum of galaxy clusters (Bulbul et al. 2014), an electron beam ion trap (EBIT) was used to investigate the resonant dielectronic recombination (DR) process in highly-charged argon ions as a possible contributor to the emission feature. The He-like Ar DR-induced transition 1s$^2$2l - 1s2l3l$^\prime$ was suggested to produce a 3.62 keV photon (Bulbul et al. 2014) near the unidentified line at 3.57 keV and was the starting point of our investigation. The collisional-radiative model NOMAD was used to create synthetic spectra for comparison with both our EBIT measurements and with spectra produced with the AtomDB database/Astrophysical Plasma Emission Code (APEC) used in the Bulbul et al. (2014) work. Excellent agreement was found between the NOMAD and EBIT spectra, providing a high level of confidence in the atomic data used. Comparison of the NOMAD and APEC spectra revealed a number of missing features in the AtomDB database near the unidentified line. At an electron temperature of $T_e$ = 1.72 keV, the inclusion of the missing lines in AtomDB increases the total flux in the 3.5 keV to 3.66 keV energy band by a factor of 2. While important, this extra emission is not enough to explain the unidentified line found in the galaxy cluster spectra.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
