Detection of X-ray Emission from a Bright Long-Period Radio Transient
Authors:
Ziteng Wang,
Nanda Rea,
Tong Bao,
David L. Kaplan,
Emil Lenc,
Zorawar Wadiasingh,
Jeremy Hare,
Andrew Zic,
Akash Anumarlapudi,
Apurba Bera,
Paz Beniamini,
A. J. Cooper,
Tracy E. Clarke,
Adam T. Deller,
J. R. Dawson,
Marcin Glowacki,
Natasha Hurley-Walker,
S. J. McSweeney,
Emil J. Polisensky,
Wendy M. Peters,
George Younes,
Keith W. Bannister,
Manisha Caleb,
Kristen C. Dage,
Clancy W. James
, et al. (24 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recently, a class of long-period radio transients (LPTs) has been discovered, exhibiting emission on timescales thousands of times longer than radio pulsars. Several models had been proposed implicating either a strong magnetic field neutron star, isolated white dwarf pulsar, or a white dwarf binary system with a low-mass companion. While several models for LPTs also predict X-ray emission, no LPT…
▽ More
Recently, a class of long-period radio transients (LPTs) has been discovered, exhibiting emission on timescales thousands of times longer than radio pulsars. Several models had been proposed implicating either a strong magnetic field neutron star, isolated white dwarf pulsar, or a white dwarf binary system with a low-mass companion. While several models for LPTs also predict X-ray emission, no LPTs have been detected in X-rays despite extensive searches. Here we report the discovery of an extremely bright LPT (10-20 Jy in radio), ASKAP J1832-0911, which has coincident radio and X-ray emission, both with a 44.2-minute period. The X-ray and radio luminosities are correlated and vary by several orders of magnitude. These properties are unique amongst known Galactic objects and require a new explanation. We consider a $\gtrsim0.5$ Myr old magnetar with a $\gtrsim 10^{13}$ G crustal field, or an extremely magnetised white dwarf in a binary system with a dwarf companion, to be plausible explanations for ASKAP J1832-0911, although both explanations pose significant challenges to formation and emission theories. The X-ray detection also establishes a new class of hour-scale periodic X-ray transients of luminosity $\sim10^{33}$ erg/s associated with exceptionally bright coherent radio emission.
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2024; v1 submitted 25 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
Inferences About the Magnetic Field Structure of a CME with Both In Situ and Faraday Rotation Constraints
Authors:
Brian E. Wood,
Samuel Tun-Beltran,
Jason E. Kooi,
Emil J. Polisensky,
Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla
Abstract:
On 2012 August 2, two CMEs (CME-1 and CME-2) erupted from the west limb of the Sun as viewed from Earth, and were observed in images from the white light coronagraphs on the SOHO and STEREO spacecraft. These events were also observed by the Very Large Array (VLA), which was monitoring the Sun at radio wavelengths, allowing time-dependent Faraday rotation observations to be made of both events. We…
▽ More
On 2012 August 2, two CMEs (CME-1 and CME-2) erupted from the west limb of the Sun as viewed from Earth, and were observed in images from the white light coronagraphs on the SOHO and STEREO spacecraft. These events were also observed by the Very Large Array (VLA), which was monitoring the Sun at radio wavelengths, allowing time-dependent Faraday rotation observations to be made of both events. We use the white-light imaging and radio data to model the 3-D field geometry of both CMEs, assuming a magnetic flux rope geometry. For CME-2, we also consider 1 au in situ field measurements in the analysis, as this CME hits STEREO-A on August~6, making this the first CME with observational constraints from stereoscopic coronal imaging, radio Faraday rotation, and in situ plasma measurements combined. The imaging and in situ observations of CME-2 provide two clear predictions for the radio data; namely that VLA should observe positive rotation measures (RMs) when the radio line of sight first encounters the CME, and that the sign should reverse to negative within a couple hours. The initial positive RMs are in fact observed. The expected sign reversal is not, but the VLA data unfortunately end too soon to be sure of the significance of this discrepancy. We interpret an RM increase prior to the expected occultation time of the CME as a signature of a sheath region of deflected field ahead of the CME itself.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
