Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Palotai, C

Wind shear and the role of eddy vapor transport in driving water convection on Jupiter

Authors: Ramanakumar Sankar, Michael H Wong, Csaba Palotai, Shawn Brueshaber

Abstract: Recent observations of convection in the jovian atmosphere have demonstrated that convection is strongly concentrated at specific locations on planet. For instance, observations of lightning show that the cyclonic features (e.g,. belts and folded filamentary regions - FFRs) show increased convective activity compared to anti-cyclonic regions. Meanwhile, the distribution of ammonia and water vapor… ▽ More Recent observations of convection in the jovian atmosphere have demonstrated that convection is strongly concentrated at specific locations on planet. For instance, observations of lightning show that the cyclonic features (e.g,. belts and folded filamentary regions - FFRs) show increased convective activity compared to anti-cyclonic regions. Meanwhile, the distribution of ammonia and water vapor show a large enrichment near the equator, which is also suggestive of strong upwelling and convective activity. Marrying these different observations is challenging due to a lack of data concerning the characteristics of the deep jovian atmosphere, and a resulting inability to observe the true deep source of the various convective phenomena. To understand the nature of these convective events and \paperedit{the role of the } structure of the deep atmosphere \paperedit{in driving convective events}, we run simulations of cloud formation and convection using the Explicit Planetary hybrid-Isentropic Coordinate General Circulation Model (EPIC GCM). We vary the dynamics of the atmosphere by parameterizing the deep wind shear and studying the resulting effect on the strength, frequency and distribution of convective storms. We find that convection in our model is strongly tied to the local dynamics and the deep wind shear. We further decompose the generation of convective available potential energy (CAPE) into three components (thermal, mechanical, and moist/chemical), and find that the chemical mechanism is the strongest component, working to advect water vapor from moisture-rich regions to moisture-poor regions and to drive convection along a ``moisture front.'' △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2025; originally announced May 2025.

Comments: 23 pages, 18 figures, accepted for publication in the Planetary Science Journal

Journal ref: Planet. Sci. J. 6 109 (2025)

Atmospheric Science Questions for a Uranian Probe

Authors: Emma K. Dahl, Naomi Rowe-Gurney, Glenn S. Orton, Shawn R. Brueshaber, Richard G. Cosentino, Csaba Palotai, Ramanakumar Sankar, Kunio M. Sayanagi

Abstract: The Ice Giants represent a unique and relatively poorly characterized class of planets that have been largely unexplored since the brief Voyager 2 flyby in the late 1980's. Uranus is particularly enigmatic, due to its extreme axial tilt, offset magnetic field, apparent low heat budget, mysteriously cool stratosphere and warm thermosphere, as well as a lack of well-defined, long-lived storm systems… ▽ More The Ice Giants represent a unique and relatively poorly characterized class of planets that have been largely unexplored since the brief Voyager 2 flyby in the late 1980's. Uranus is particularly enigmatic, due to its extreme axial tilt, offset magnetic field, apparent low heat budget, mysteriously cool stratosphere and warm thermosphere, as well as a lack of well-defined, long-lived storm systems and distinct atmospheric features. All these characteristics make Uranus a scientifically intriguing target, particularly for missions able to complete in situ measurements. The 2023-2032 Decadal Strategy for Planetary Science and Astrobiology prioritized a flagship orbiter and probe to explore Uranus with the intent to "...transform our knowledge of Ice Giants in general and the Uranian system in particular" (National Academies of Sciences and Medicine, 2022). In support of this recommendation, we present community-supported science questions, key measurements, and a suggested instrument suite that focuses on the exploration and characterization of the Uranian atmosphere by an in situ probe. The scope of these science questions encompasses the origin, evolution, and current processes that shape the Uranian atmosphere, and in turn the Uranian system overall. Addressing these questions will inform vital new insights about Uranus, Ice Giants and Gas Giants in general, the large population of Neptune-sized exoplanets, and the Solar System as a whole. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 36 pages, 0 figures, to be published in special issue of Space Science Reviews

A retrospective analysis of mid-infrared observations of the Comet D/Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Wesley impacts on Jupiter

Authors: James A. Sinclair, Carey M. Lisse, Glenn S. Orton, Meera Krishnamoorthy, Leigh N. Fletcher, Joseph Hora, Csaba Palotai, Thomas Hayward

Abstract: We present a retrospective analysis of Earth-based mid-infrared observations of Jupiter capturing the aftermath of the impacts by Comet D/Shoemaker-Levy 9 (henceforth SL9) in July 1994 and the Wesley impactor in July 2009. While the atmospheric effects of both impacts have been reported previously, we were motivated to re-examine both events using consistent methods to enable robust, quantitative… ▽ More We present a retrospective analysis of Earth-based mid-infrared observations of Jupiter capturing the aftermath of the impacts by Comet D/Shoemaker-Levy 9 (henceforth SL9) in July 1994 and the Wesley impactor in July 2009. While the atmospheric effects of both impacts have been reported previously, we were motivated to re-examine both events using consistent methods to enable robust, quantitative comparisons. We analyzed spectrophotometry and spectroscopy capturing both impacts using two independent analyses: 1) a least-squares search over a grid of candidate mineral species to determine the composition of impact residue and 2) a radiative transfer analysis to derive atmospheric information. We observe that the SL9 impact sites are enhanced in stratospheric CH4 emissions at 7.9 um, due to shock heating and adiabatic compression from plume re-entry, and from 8.5 - 11.5 um due to stratospheric NH3 emission and non-gaseous cometary material. We derive NH3 concentrations of 5.7 ppmv at 30 mbar. In new findings, we find that the SL9 impact sites also exhibit a non-gaseous emission feature at 18 - 19 um. The non-gaseous emission at 8.5 - 11.5 and 18 - 19 um emission is best reproduced by predominantly amorphous olivine and obsidian at similar abundances. The Wesley impact site exhibits enhanced emissions from 8.8 - 11.5 and 18 - 19 um. We found this could be reproduced by predominantly amorphous olivine and stratospheric NH3 at concentrations of 150 ppbv at 30 mbar. Stratospheric NH3 abundances are a factor of 40 higher in the SL9 impacts compared to the Wesley impact, which confirms the former reached deeper, NH3-richer altitudes of the atmosphere. The absence of silicas in the Wesley impact would place an upper limit of 10 km/s on the incident velocity and 9 degree on the entry angle of the impactor such that temperatures were insufficient to convert silicates. △ Less

Submitted 3 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Journal ref: Icarus, Volume 394, article id. 115404 (2023)

A new convective parameterization applied to Jupiter: implications for water abundance near the $24^\circ$ N region

Authors: Ramanakumar Sankar, Csaba Palotai

Abstract: Jupiter's atmosphere features a variety of clouds that are formed from the interplay of chemistry and atmospheric dynamics, from the deep red color of the Great Red Spot to the high altitude white ammonia clouds present in the zones (bright bands in Jupiter's atmosphere). Beneath these upper level clouds, water condensation occurs, and sporadically leads to the formation of towering convective sto… ▽ More Jupiter's atmosphere features a variety of clouds that are formed from the interplay of chemistry and atmospheric dynamics, from the deep red color of the Great Red Spot to the high altitude white ammonia clouds present in the zones (bright bands in Jupiter's atmosphere). Beneath these upper level clouds, water condensation occurs, and sporadically leads to the formation of towering convective storms, driven by the release of large amounts of latent heat. These storms result in a widespread disruption of the cloud and dynamical structure of the atmosphere at the latitude where they form, making the study of these events paramount in understanding the dynamics at depth, and the role of water in the jovian atmosphere. In this work, we use the Explicit Planetary hybrid-Isentropic Coordinate (EPIC) General Circulation Model (GCM) to study the jovian atmosphere, with a focus on moist convective storm formation from water condensation. We present the addition of a sub-grid scale moist convective module to model convective water cloud formation. We focus on the $24^\circ$ N latitude, the location of a high speed jetstream, where convective upwellings have been observed every 4-5 years. We find that the potential of convection, and vertical mass and energy flux of the atmosphere is strongly correlated with the amount of water, and we determine an upper limit of the amount of water in the the region surrounding the jet as twice the solar [O/H] ratio. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: 31 pages, 26 figures, accepted for publication in Icarus

The aftermath of convective events near Jupiter's fastest prograde jet: implications for clouds, dynamics and vertical wind shear

Authors: Ramanakumar Sankar, Chloe Klare, Csaba Palotai

Abstract: The $24^{\circ}$ N jet borders the North Tropical Belt and North Tropical Zone, and is the fastest prograde jet on Jupiter, reaching speeds above $170$ m/s. In this region, observations have shown several periodic convective plumes, likely from latent heat release from water condensation, which affect the cloud and zonal wind structure of the jet. We model this region with the Explicit Planetary h… ▽ More The $24^{\circ}$ N jet borders the North Tropical Belt and North Tropical Zone, and is the fastest prograde jet on Jupiter, reaching speeds above $170$ m/s. In this region, observations have shown several periodic convective plumes, likely from latent heat release from water condensation, which affect the cloud and zonal wind structure of the jet. We model this region with the Explicit Planetary hybrid-Isentropic Coordinate model using its active microphysics scheme to study the phenomenology of water and ammonia clouds within the jet region. On perturbing the atmosphere, we find that an upper tropospheric wave develops that directly influences the cloud structure within the jet. This wave travels at $\sim75$ m/s in our model, and leads to periodic chevron-shaped features in the ammonia cloud deck. These features travel with the wave speed, and are subsequently much slower than the zonal wind at the cloud deck. The cloud structure, and the slower drift rate, were both observed following the convective outbreak in this region in 2016 and 2020. We find that an upper level circulation is responsible for these cloud features in the aftermath of the convective outbursts. The comparatively slower observed drift rates of these features, relative to the wind speed of the jet, provides constraints on the vertical wind shear above the cloud tops, and we suggest that wind velocities determined from cloud tracking should correspond to a different altitude compared to the $680$ hPa pressure level. We also diagnose the convective potential of the atmosphere due to water condensation, and find that it is strongly coupled to the wave. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: 19 pages, 17 figures, accepted for publication in Icarus

Ice Giant Atmospheric Science

Authors: Emma K. Dahl, Shawn Brueshaber, Richard Cosentino, Csaba Palotai, Naomi Rowe-Gurney, Ramanakumar Sankar, Kunio Sayanagi, Shahid Aslam, Kevin Baines, Erika Barth, Nancy J. Chanover, Leigh N. Fletcher, Sandrine Guerlet, Heidi Hammel, Mark Hofstadter, Ali Hyder, Erin Leonard, Timothy A. Livengood, Tom Momary, Glenn Orton, Imke de Pater, Kurt Retherford, James Sinclair, Krista Soderlund, Linda Spilker , et al. (2 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This white paper, written in support of NASA's 2023-2032 Planetary Decadal Survey, outlines 10 major questions that focus on the origin, evolution, and current processes that shape the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune. Prioritizing these questions over the next decade will greatly improve our understanding of this unique class of planets, which have remained largely unexplored since the Voyager f… ▽ More This white paper, written in support of NASA's 2023-2032 Planetary Decadal Survey, outlines 10 major questions that focus on the origin, evolution, and current processes that shape the atmospheres of Uranus and Neptune. Prioritizing these questions over the next decade will greatly improve our understanding of this unique class of planets, which have remained largely unexplored since the Voyager flybys. Studying the atmospheres of the Ice Giants will greatly inform our understanding of the origin and evolution of the solar system as a whole, in addition to the growing number of exoplanetary systems that contain Neptune-mass planets. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: 8 pages, 0 figures, White Paper submitted to the Astrobiology and Planetary Science Decadal Survey

EPIC Simulations of Neptune's Dark Spots Using an Active Cloud Microphysical Model

Authors: Nathan Hadland, Ramanakumar Sankar, Raymond Paul LeBeau, Jr, Csaba Palotai

Abstract: The Great Dark Spot (GDS-89) observed by Voyager 2 was the first of several large-scale vortices observed on Neptune, the most recent of which was observed in 2018 in the northern hemisphere (NDS-2018). Ongoing observations of these features are constraining cloud formation, drift, shape oscillations, and other dynamic properties. In order to effectively model these characteristics, an explicit ca… ▽ More The Great Dark Spot (GDS-89) observed by Voyager 2 was the first of several large-scale vortices observed on Neptune, the most recent of which was observed in 2018 in the northern hemisphere (NDS-2018). Ongoing observations of these features are constraining cloud formation, drift, shape oscillations, and other dynamic properties. In order to effectively model these characteristics, an explicit calculation of methane cloud microphysics is needed. Using an updated version of the Explicit Planetary Isentropic Coordinate General Circulation Model (EPIC GCM) and its active cloud microphysics module to account for the condensation of methane, we investigate the evolution of large scale vortices on Neptune. We model the effect of methane deep abundance and cloud formation on vortex stability and dynamics. In our simulations, the vortex shows a sharp contrast in methane vapor density inside compared to outside the vortex. Methane vapor column density is analogous to optical depth and provides a more consistent tracer to track the vortex, so we use that variable over potential vorticity. We match the meridional drift rate of the GDS and gain an initial insight into the evolution of vortices in the northern hemisphere, such as the NDS-2018. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: 9 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Fragmentation modelling of the August 2019 impact on Jupiter

Authors: Ramanakumar Sankar, Csaba Palotai, Ricardo Hueso, Marc Delcroix, Ethan Chappel, Agustin Sanchez-Lavega

Abstract: On 7th August 2019, an impact flash lasting $\sim1$s was observed on Jupiter. The video of this event was analysed to obtain the lightcurve and determine the energy release and initial mass. We find that the impactor released a total energy of $96-151$ kilotons of TNT, corresponding to an initial mass between $190-260$ metric tonnes with a diameter between $4-10$m. We developed a fragmentation mod… ▽ More On 7th August 2019, an impact flash lasting $\sim1$s was observed on Jupiter. The video of this event was analysed to obtain the lightcurve and determine the energy release and initial mass. We find that the impactor released a total energy of $96-151$ kilotons of TNT, corresponding to an initial mass between $190-260$ metric tonnes with a diameter between $4-10$m. We developed a fragmentation model to simulate the atmospheric breakup of the object and reproduce the lightcurve. We model three different materials: cometary, stony and metallic at speeds of $60$, $65 $ and $70$ km/s to determine the material makeup of the impacting object. The slower cases are best fit by a strong, metallic object while the faster cases require a weaker material. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: 10 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables, Accepted for publication in MNRAS

Analysis of June 2, 2016 bolide event

Authors: Csaba Palotai, Ramanakumar Sankar, Dwayne L. Free, J. Andreas Howell, Elena Botella, Daniel Batcheldor

Abstract: On June 2, 2016 at 10h56m UTC, a $-20.4 \pm 0.2$ magnitude superbolide was observed over Arizona. Fragments were located a few days later and the meteorites were given the name Dishchii'bikoh. We present analysis of this event based on 3 cameras and a multi-spectral sensor observations by the SkySentinel continuous fireball-monitoring camera network, supplemented by a dash cam footage and a fragme… ▽ More On June 2, 2016 at 10h56m UTC, a $-20.4 \pm 0.2$ magnitude superbolide was observed over Arizona. Fragments were located a few days later and the meteorites were given the name Dishchii'bikoh. We present analysis of this event based on 3 cameras and a multi-spectral sensor observations by the SkySentinel continuous fireball-monitoring camera network, supplemented by a dash cam footage and a fragmentation model. The bolide began its luminous flight at an altitude of $100.2 \pm 0.4$ km at coordinates $φ= 34.555 \pm 0.002^\circ$N planetographic latitude and $λ= 110.459 \pm 0.002^\circ$W longitude, and it had a pre-atmospheric velocity of $17.4 \pm 0.3$ km/s. The calculated orbital parameters indicate that the meteoroid did not belong to any presently known asteroid family. From our calculations, the impacting object had an initial mass of $14.8 \pm 1.7$ metric tonnes with an estimated initial diameter of $2.03 \pm 0.12$ m. △ Less

Submitted 21 May, 2019; v1 submitted 15 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: 12 pages, 15 figures, 6 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Numerical Modeling of the 2009 Impact Event on Jupiter

Authors: Jarrad W. T. Pond, Csaba Palotai, Travis Gabriel, Donald G. Korycansky, Joseph Harrington, Noemi Rebeli

Abstract: We have investigated the 2009 July impact event on Jupiter using the ZEUS-MP 2 three-dimensional hydrodynamics code. We studied the impact itself and the following plume development. Eight impactors were considered: 0.5 km and 1 km porous (ρ= 1.760 g cm^{-3}) and non-porous (ρ= 2.700 g cm^{-3}) basalt impactors, and 0.5 km and 1 km porous (ρ= 0.600 g cm^{-3}) and non-porous ρ= 0.917 g cm^{-3}) ice… ▽ More We have investigated the 2009 July impact event on Jupiter using the ZEUS-MP 2 three-dimensional hydrodynamics code. We studied the impact itself and the following plume development. Eight impactors were considered: 0.5 km and 1 km porous (ρ= 1.760 g cm^{-3}) and non-porous (ρ= 2.700 g cm^{-3}) basalt impactors, and 0.5 km and 1 km porous (ρ= 0.600 g cm^{-3}) and non-porous ρ= 0.917 g cm^{-3}) ice impactors. The simulations consisted of these bolides colliding with Jupiter at an incident angle of θ= 69 degrees from the vertical and with an impact velocity of v = 61.4 km s^{-1}. Our simulations show the development of relatively larger, faster plumes created after impacts involving 1 km diameter bodies. Comparing simulations of the 2009 event with simulations of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 events reveals a difference in plume development, with the higher incident angle of the 2009 impact leading to a shallower terminal depth and a smaller and slower plume. We also studied the amount of dynamical chaos present in the simulations conducted at the 2009 incident angle. Compared to the chaos of the SL9 simulations, where θis approximately 45 degrees, we find no significant difference in chaos at the higher 2009 incident angle. △ Less

Submitted 23 March, 2012; originally announced March 2012.

Comments: 8 pages, 7 figures

Journal ref: 2012, ApJ, 745, 113

Plume Development of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 Comet Impact

Authors: Csaba Palotai, Donald G. Korycansky, Joseph Harrington, Noémi Rebeli, Travis Gabriel

Abstract: We have studied plume formation after a Jovian comet impact using the ZEUS-MP 2 hydrodynamics code. The three-dimensional models followed objects with 500, 750, and 1000 meter diameters. Our simulations show the development of a fast, upward-moving component of the plume in the wake of the impacting comet that "pinches off" from the bulk of the cometary material ~50 km below the 1 bar pressure lev… ▽ More We have studied plume formation after a Jovian comet impact using the ZEUS-MP 2 hydrodynamics code. The three-dimensional models followed objects with 500, 750, and 1000 meter diameters. Our simulations show the development of a fast, upward-moving component of the plume in the wake of the impacting comet that "pinches off" from the bulk of the cometary material ~50 km below the 1 bar pressure level, ~100 km above the depth of greatest mass and energy deposition. The fast-moving component contains about twice the mass of the initial comet, but consists almost entirely (>99.9%) of Jovian atmosphere rather than cometary material. The ejecta rise mainly along the impact trajectory, but an additional vertical velocity component due to buoyancy establishes itself within seconds of impact, leading to an asymmetry in the ejecta with respect to the entry trajectory. The mass of the upward-moving component follows a velocity distribution M(>v) approximately proportional to v^-1.4 (v^-1.6 for the 750 m and 500 m cases) in the velocity range 0.1 < v < 10 km/s. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2011; originally announced February 2011.

Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures. Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal