-
A GMOS/IFU Study of Jellyfish Galaxies in Massive Clusters
Authors:
Jeong Hwan Lee,
Myung Gyoon Lee,
Jae Yeon Mun,
Brian S. Cho,
Jisu Kang
Abstract:
Jellyfish galaxies are an intriguing snapshot of galaxies undergoing ram-pressure stripping (RPS) in dense environments, showing spectacular star-forming knots in their disks and tails. We study the ionized gas properties of five jellyfish galaxies in massive clusters with Gemini GMOS/IFU observations: MACSJ0916-JFG1 ($z=0.330$), MACSJ1752-JFG2 ($z=0.353$), A2744-F0083 ($z=0.303$), MACSJ1258-JFG1…
▽ More
Jellyfish galaxies are an intriguing snapshot of galaxies undergoing ram-pressure stripping (RPS) in dense environments, showing spectacular star-forming knots in their disks and tails. We study the ionized gas properties of five jellyfish galaxies in massive clusters with Gemini GMOS/IFU observations: MACSJ0916-JFG1 ($z=0.330$), MACSJ1752-JFG2 ($z=0.353$), A2744-F0083 ($z=0.303$), MACSJ1258-JFG1 ($z=0.342$), and MACSJ1720-JFG1 ($z=0.383$). BPT diagrams show that various mechanisms (star formation, AGN, or mixed effects) are ionizing gas in these galaxies. Radial velocity distributions of ionized gas seem to follow disk rotation of galaxies, with the appearance of a few high-velocity components in the tails as a sign of RPS. Mean gas velocity dispersion is lower than 50 \kms~in most star-forming regions except near AGNs or shock-heated regions, indicating that the ionized gas %in these star-forming regions is dynamically cold. Integrated star formation rates (SFRs) of these galaxies range from $7~{\rm M_{\odot}~{\rm yr^{-1}}}$ to $35~{\rm M_{\odot}~{\rm yr^{-1}}}$ and the tail SFRs are from $0.6~{\rm M_{\odot}~{\rm yr^{-1}}}$ to $16~{\rm M_{\odot}~{\rm yr^{-1}}}$, which are much higher than those of other jellyfish galaxies in the local universe. These high SFR values imply that RPS triggers intense star formation activity in these extreme jellyfish galaxies. The phase-space diagrams demonstrate that the jellyfish galaxies with higher stellar masses and higher host cluster velocity dispersion are likely to have more enhanced star formation activity. The jellyfish galaxies in this study have similar gas kinematics and dynamical states to those in the local universe, but they show a much higher SFR.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Enhanced Star Formation Activity of Extreme Jellyfish Galaxies in Massive Clusters and the Role of Ram Pressure Stripping
Authors:
Jeong Hwan Lee,
Myung Gyoon Lee,
Jae Yeon Mun,
Brian S. Cho,
Jisu Kang
Abstract:
Jellyfish galaxies are an excellent tool to investigate the short-term effects of ram pressure stripping (RPS) on star formation in cluster environments. It has been thought that the star formation activity of jellyfish galaxies may depend on the host cluster properties, but previous studies have not yet found a clear correlation. In this study, we estimate the \Ha-based star formation rates (SFRs…
▽ More
Jellyfish galaxies are an excellent tool to investigate the short-term effects of ram pressure stripping (RPS) on star formation in cluster environments. It has been thought that the star formation activity of jellyfish galaxies may depend on the host cluster properties, but previous studies have not yet found a clear correlation. In this study, we estimate the \Ha-based star formation rates (SFRs) of five jellyfish galaxies in massive clusters ($σ_{v, {\rm cl}}\gtrsim1000~{\rm km~s^{-1}}$) at $z\sim0.3-0.4$ using Gemini GMOS/IFU observations to explore the relationship. Combining our results with those in the literature, we find that the star formation activity of jellyfish galaxies shows a positive correlation with their host cluster velocity dispersion as a proxy of cluster mass and dynamical states. We divide the jellyfish galaxy sample into two groups with strong and weak RPS signatures using a morphological class. In the phase-space diagram, the jellyfish galaxies with strong RPS features show a higher SFR and a stronger central concentration than those with weak RPS features. We estimate their SFR excess relative to the star formation main sequence (starburstiness; $R_{\rm SB}={\rm SFR/SFR_{MS}}(z)$) and the density of the surrounding intracluster medium (ICM) using scaling relations with the cluster velocity dispersion. As a result, the starburstiness of jellyfish galaxies with strong RPS signatures clearly exhibits positive correlations with cluster velocity dispersion, ICM density, and strength of ram pressure. This shows that the relation between RPS and star formation activity of jellyfish galaxies depends on the host cluster properties and strength of ram pressure.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Star Formation Activity of Galaxies Undergoing Ram Pressure Stripping in the Virgo Cluster
Authors:
Jae Yeon Mun,
Ho Seong Hwang,
Myung Gyoon Lee,
Aeree Chung,
Hyein Yoon,
Jong Chul Lee
Abstract:
We study galaxies undergoing ram pressure stripping in the Virgo cluster to examine whether we can identify any discernible trend in their star formation activity. We first use 48 galaxies undergoing different stages of stripping based on HI morphology, HI deficiency, and relative extent to the stellar disk, from the VIVA survey. We then employ a new scheme for galaxy classification which combines…
▽ More
We study galaxies undergoing ram pressure stripping in the Virgo cluster to examine whether we can identify any discernible trend in their star formation activity. We first use 48 galaxies undergoing different stages of stripping based on HI morphology, HI deficiency, and relative extent to the stellar disk, from the VIVA survey. We then employ a new scheme for galaxy classification which combines HI mass fractions and locations in projected phase space, resulting in a new sample of 365 galaxies. We utilize a variety of star formation tracers, which include g - r, WISE [3.4] - [12] colors, and starburstiness that are defined by stellar mass and star formation rates to compare the star formation activity of galaxies at different stripping stages. We find no clear evidence for enhancement in the integrated star formation activity of galaxies undergoing early to active stripping. We are instead able to capture the overall quenching of star formation activity with increasing degree of ram pressure stripping, in agreement with previous studies. Our results suggest that if there is any ram pressure stripping induced enhancement, it is at best locally modest, and galaxies undergoing enhancement make up a small fraction of the total sample. Our results also indicate that it is possible to trace galaxies at different stages of stripping with the combination of HI gas content and location in projected phase space, which can be extended to other galaxy clusters that lack high-resolution HI imaging.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2021; v1 submitted 19 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
A Comparison of Flare Forecasting Methods. IV. Evaluating Consecutive-Day Forecasting Patterns
Authors:
Sung-Hong Park,
K. D. Leka,
Kanya Kusano,
Jesse Andries,
Graham Barnes,
Suzy Bingham,
D. Shaun Bloomfield,
Aoife E. McCloskey,
Veronique Delouille,
David Falconer,
Peter T. Gallagher,
Manolis K. Georgoulis,
Yuki Kubo,
Kangjin Lee,
Sangwoo Lee,
Vasily Lobzin,
JunChul Mun,
Sophie A. Murray,
Tarek A. M. Hamad Nageem,
Rami Qahwaji,
Michael Sharpe,
Rob A. Steenburgh,
Graham Steward,
Michael Terkildsen
Abstract:
A crucial challenge to successful flare prediction is forecasting periods that transition between "flare-quiet" and "flare-active". Building on earlier studies in this series (Barnes et al. 2016; Leka et al. 2019a,b) in which we describe methodology, details, and results of flare forecasting comparison efforts, we focus here on patterns of forecast outcomes (success and failure) over multi-day per…
▽ More
A crucial challenge to successful flare prediction is forecasting periods that transition between "flare-quiet" and "flare-active". Building on earlier studies in this series (Barnes et al. 2016; Leka et al. 2019a,b) in which we describe methodology, details, and results of flare forecasting comparison efforts, we focus here on patterns of forecast outcomes (success and failure) over multi-day periods. A novel analysis is developed to evaluate forecasting success in the context of catching the first event of flare-active periods, and conversely, of correctly predicting declining flare activity. We demonstrate these evaluation methods graphically and quantitatively as they provide both quick comparative evaluations and options for detailed analysis. For the testing interval 2016-2017, we determine the relative frequency distribution of two-day dichotomous forecast outcomes for three different event histories (i.e., event/event, no-event/event and event/no-event), and use it to highlight performance differences between forecasting methods. A trend is identified across all forecasting methods that a high/low forecast probability on day-1 remains high/low on day-2 even though flaring activity is transitioning. For M-class and larger flares, we find that explicitly including persistence or prior flare history in computing forecasts helps to improve overall forecast performance. It is also found that using magnetic/modern data leads to improvement in catching the first-event/first-no-event transitions. Finally, 15% of major (i.e., M-class or above) flare days over the testing interval were effectively missed due to a lack of observations from instruments away from the Earth-Sun line.
△ Less
Submitted 21 January, 2020; v1 submitted 8 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
A Comparison of Flare Forecasting Methods. III. Systematic Behaviors of Operational Solar Flare Forecasting Systems
Authors:
K. D. Leka,
Sung-Hong Park,
Kanya Kusano,
Jesse Andries,
Graham Barnes,
Suzy Bingham,
D. Shaun Bloomfield,
Aoife E. McCloskey,
Veronique Delouille,
David Falconer,
Peter T. Gallagher,
Manolis K. Georgoulis,
Yuki Kubo,
Kangjin Lee,
Sangwoo Lee,
Vasily Lobzin,
JunChul Mun,
Sophie A. Murray,
Tarek A. M. Hamad Nageem,
Rami Qahwaji,
Michael Sharpe,
Rob Steenburgh,
Graham Steward,
Michael Terkildsen
Abstract:
A workshop was recently held at Nagoya University (31 October - 02 November 2017), sponsored by the Center for International Collaborative Research, at the Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Japan, to quantitatively compare the performance of today's operational solar flare forecasting facilities. Building upon Paper I of this series (Barnes et al. 2016), in Paper…
▽ More
A workshop was recently held at Nagoya University (31 October - 02 November 2017), sponsored by the Center for International Collaborative Research, at the Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Japan, to quantitatively compare the performance of today's operational solar flare forecasting facilities. Building upon Paper I of this series (Barnes et al. 2016), in Paper II (Leka et al. 2019) we described the participating methods for this latest comparison effort, the evaluation methodology, and presented quantitative comparisons. In this paper we focus on the behavior and performance of the methods when evaluated in the context of broad implementation differences. Acknowledging the short testing interval available and the small number of methods available, we do find that forecast performance: 1) appears to improve by including persistence or prior flare activity, region evolution, and a human "forecaster in the loop"; 2) is hurt by restricting data to disk-center observations; 3) may benefit from long-term statistics, but mostly when then combined with modern data sources and statistical approaches. These trends are arguably weak and must be viewed with numerous caveats, as discussed both here and in Paper II. Following this present work, we present in Paper IV a novel analysis method to evaluate temporal patterns of forecasting errors of both types (i.e., misses and false alarms; Park et al. 2019). Hence, most importantly, with this series of papers we demonstrate the techniques for facilitating comparisons in the interest of establishing performance-positive methodologies.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
A Comparison of Flare Forecasting Methods. II. Benchmarks, Metrics and Performance Results for Operational Solar Flare Forecasting Systems
Authors:
K. D. Leka,
Sung-Hong Park,
Kanya Kusano,
Jesse Andries,
Graham Barnes,
Suzy Bingham,
D. Shaun Bloomfield,
Aoife E. McCloskey,
Veronique Delouille,
David Falconer,
Peter T. Gallagher,
Manolis K. Georgoulis,
Yuki Kubo,
Kangjin Lee,
Sangwoo Lee,
Vasily Lobzin,
JunChul Mun,
Sophie A. Murray,
Tarek A. M. Hamad Nageem,
Rami Qahwaji,
Michael Sharpe,
Rob Steenburgh,
Graham Steward,
Michael Terkildsen
Abstract:
Solar flares are extremely energetic phenomena in our Solar System. Their impulsive, often drastic radiative increases, in particular at short wavelengths, bring immediate impacts that motivate solar physics and space weather research to understand solar flares to the point of being able to forecast them. As data and algorithms improve dramatically, questions must be asked concerning how well the…
▽ More
Solar flares are extremely energetic phenomena in our Solar System. Their impulsive, often drastic radiative increases, in particular at short wavelengths, bring immediate impacts that motivate solar physics and space weather research to understand solar flares to the point of being able to forecast them. As data and algorithms improve dramatically, questions must be asked concerning how well the forecasting performs; crucially, we must ask how to rigorously measure performance in order to critically gauge any improvements. Building upon earlier-developed methodology (Barnes et al, 2016, Paper I), international representatives of regional warning centers and research facilities assembled in 2017 at the Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Japan to - for the first time - directly compare the performance of operational solar flare forecasting methods. Multiple quantitative evaluation metrics are employed, with focus and discussion on evaluation methodologies given the restrictions of operational forecasting. Numerous methods performed consistently above the "no skill" level, although which method scored top marks is decisively a function of flare event definition and the metric used; there was no single winner. Following in this paper series we ask why the performances differ by examining implementation details (Leka et al. 2019, Paper III), and then we present a novel analysis method to evaluate temporal patterns of forecasting errors in (Park et al. 2019, Paper IV). With these works, this team presents a well-defined and robust methodology for evaluating solar flare forecasting methods in both research and operational frameworks, and today's performance benchmarks against which improvements and new methods may be compared.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
