High energy time lags of Gamma Ray Bursts
Authors:
C. Maraventano,
G. Ghirlanda,
L. Nava,
T. Di Salvo,
W. Leone,
R. Iaria,
L. Burderi,
A. Tsvetkova
Abstract:
Positive lags between the arrival time of different photon energies are commonly observed in Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), where soft photons lag behind harder ones. However, some GRBs exhibit the opposite behavior. In particular, Fermi LAT observations have revealed that high-energy photons often have a delayed onset. We explore spectral lags as a tool to identify emission components, analyzing Fermi…
▽ More
Positive lags between the arrival time of different photon energies are commonly observed in Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), where soft photons lag behind harder ones. However, some GRBs exhibit the opposite behavior. In particular, Fermi LAT observations have revealed that high-energy photons often have a delayed onset. We explore spectral lags as a tool to identify emission components, analyzing Fermi GBM and LAT Low Energy (LLE) data. Using the Discrete Correlation Function method, we compute spectral lags in four energy bands (10 keV-100 MeV) for 70 GRBs from the LLE Catalog. Lags between 10 keV and 1 MeV are mostly positive (76%), possibly due to a hard-to-soft spectral evolution. However, lags between the LLE band (30-100 MeV) and GBM (10-100 keV) vary: 40% are positive, while 37% are negative. These negative lags suggest the delayed emergence of an additional high-energy component. Spectral analysis of 56 GRBs reveals that negative lags correspond to an LLE spectral index harder than the GBM high-energy power law. LLE spectral lags can thus serve as a diagnostic tool to identify and characterize emission components, emphasizing the importance of combining temporal and spectral analyses to better understand GRB emission mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
The puzzling orbital residuals of XTE J1710-281: is a Jovian planet orbiting around the binary system?
Authors:
R. Iaria,
T. Di Salvo,
A. Anitra,
C. Miceli,
W. Leone,
C. Maraventano,
F. Barra,
A. Riggio,
A. Sanna,
A. Manca,
L. Burderi
Abstract:
XTE J1710-281 is a transient eclipsing binary system with a period close to 3.28 hours, hosting a neutron star. The average eclipse duration is 420 seconds, and eclipse arrival times reported in the literature span from 1999 to 2017. A previous analysis of the eclipse arrival times using the eclipse timing technique revealed a complex pattern of delays, indicating the presence of three orbital gli…
▽ More
XTE J1710-281 is a transient eclipsing binary system with a period close to 3.28 hours, hosting a neutron star. The average eclipse duration is 420 seconds, and eclipse arrival times reported in the literature span from 1999 to 2017. A previous analysis of the eclipse arrival times using the eclipse timing technique revealed a complex pattern of delays, indicating the presence of three orbital glitches. These glitches correspond to sudden variations in the orbital period, allowing for the identification of four distinct epochs. We have re-analyzed the 78 eclipse arrival times spanning 18 years utilizing the eclipse timing technique to derive the corresponding delays as a function of time. We find that the observed delays align well with a fitting model employing an eccentric sine function characterized by an amplitude of $6.1 \pm 0.5$ s, eccentricity of $0.38 \pm 0.17$, and a period of $17.1 \pm 1.5$ years. Additionally, we identified the orbital period as 3.28106345(13) hours, with a reference epoch of $T_0=54112.83200(2)$ Modified Julian Date (MJD). We obtained an upper limit of the orbital period derivative of $3.6 \times 10^{-13}$ s~s$^{-1}$. From the average value of the eclipse duration, we estimate that the companion star has a mass of 0.22~\Msun for a neutron star mass of 1.4~\Msun, and the inclination of the source is $78.1^{+1.5}_{-1.2}$ degrees. The companion star is in thermal equilibrium. The orbital period derivative is consistent with a conservative mass transfer scenario, where the angular momentum loss due to magnetic braking dominates over gravitational radiation angular momentum loss if the former is present. The eccentric modulation can be explained by a third body with a mass of 2.7 Jovian masses, orbiting with a revolution period close to 17 years and an eccentricity of 0.38. (abridged abstract)
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
