-
Detecting and Denoising Gravitational Wave Signals from Binary Black Holes using Deep Learning
Authors:
Chinthak Murali,
David Lumley
Abstract:
We present a convolutional neural network, designed in the auto-encoder configuration that can detect and denoise astrophysical gravitational waves from merging black hole binaries, orders of magnitude faster than the conventional matched-filtering based detection that is currently employed at advanced LIGO (aLIGO). The Neural-Net architecture is such that it learns from the sparse representation…
▽ More
We present a convolutional neural network, designed in the auto-encoder configuration that can detect and denoise astrophysical gravitational waves from merging black hole binaries, orders of magnitude faster than the conventional matched-filtering based detection that is currently employed at advanced LIGO (aLIGO). The Neural-Net architecture is such that it learns from the sparse representation of data in the time-frequency domain and constructs a non-linear mapping function that maps this representation into two separate masks for signal and noise, facilitating the separation of the two, from raw data. This approach is the first of its kind to apply machine learning based gravitational wave detection/denoising in the 2D representation of gravitational wave data. We applied our formalism to the first gravitational wave event detected, GW150914, successfully recovering the signal at all three phases of coalescence at both detectors. This method is further tested on the gravitational wave data from the second observing run ($O2$) of aLIGO, reproducing all binary black hole mergers detected in $O2$ at both the aLIGO detectors. The Neural-Net seems to have uncovered a pattern of 'ringing' after the ringdown phase of the coalescence, which is not a feature that is present in the conventional binary merger templates. This method can also interpolate and extrapolate between modeled templates and explore gravitational waves that are unmodeled and hence not present in the template bank of signals used in the matched-filtering detection pipelines. Faster and efficient detection schemes, such as this method, will be instrumental as ground based detectors reach their design sensitivity, likely to result in several hundreds of potential detections in a few months of observing runs.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Seismic noise characterization at a potential gravitational wave detector site in Australia
Authors:
Hamid Satari,
Carl Blair,
Li Ju,
David Blair,
Chunnong Zhao,
Erdinc Saygin,
Patrick Meyers,
David Lumley
Abstract:
A critical consideration in the design of next generation gravitational wave detectors is the understanding of the seismic environment that can introduce coherent and incoherent noise of seismic origin at different frequencies. We present detailed low-frequency ambient seismic noise characterization (0.1--10~Hz) at the Gingin site in Western Australia. Unlike the microseism band (0.06--1~Hz) for w…
▽ More
A critical consideration in the design of next generation gravitational wave detectors is the understanding of the seismic environment that can introduce coherent and incoherent noise of seismic origin at different frequencies. We present detailed low-frequency ambient seismic noise characterization (0.1--10~Hz) at the Gingin site in Western Australia. Unlike the microseism band (0.06--1~Hz) for which the power shows strong correlations with nearby buoy measurements in the Indian Ocean, the seismic spectrum above 1~Hz is a complex superposition of wind induced seismic noise and anthropogenic seismic noise which can be characterized using beamforming to distinguish between the effects of coherent and incoherent wind induced seismic noise combined with temporal variations in the spatio-spectral properties of seismic noise. This also helps characterizing the anthropogenic seismic noise. We show that wind induced seismic noise can either increase or decrease the coherency of background seismic noise for wind speeds above 6~m/s due to the interaction of wind with various surface objects. In comparison to the seismic noise at the Virgo site, the secondary microseism (0.2~Hz) noise level is higher in Gingin, but the seismic noise level between 1 and 10~Hz is lower due to the sparse population and absence of nearby road traffic.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2023; v1 submitted 14 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Low coherency of wind induced seismic noise: Implications for gravitational wave detection
Authors:
Hamid Satari,
Carl Blair,
Li Ju,
Erdinc Saygin,
David Blair,
Chunnong Zhao,
David Lumley,
Patrick Meyers
Abstract:
Seismic noise poses challenges for gravitational wave detection. Effective vibration isolation and methods to subtract unsheildable Newtonian Noise are examples. Seismic arrays offer one way to deal with these issues assuming seismic coherency. In this paper we find that wind induced seismic noise is incoherent and will dramatically reduce the projected low frequency sensitivity of future gravitat…
▽ More
Seismic noise poses challenges for gravitational wave detection. Effective vibration isolation and methods to subtract unsheildable Newtonian Noise are examples. Seismic arrays offer one way to deal with these issues assuming seismic coherency. In this paper we find that wind induced seismic noise is incoherent and will dramatically reduce the projected low frequency sensitivity of future gravitational wave detectors. To quantify this, we measure the coherence length of wind induced seismic noise from 0.06--20~Hz in three distinct locations: close to a building, among tall trees and in shrubs. We show that wind induced seismic noise is ubiquitous and reduces the coherence lengths form several hundred meters to 2--40~m for 0.06--0.1~Hz, from $>$60~m to 3--16~m for 1.5--2.5~Hz and from $>$35~m to 1--16~m around 16.6 Hz frequency bands in the study area. This leads to significant loss of velocity and angular resolution of the array for primary microseism, 5 times worse Newtonian Noise cancellation by wiener filtering at 2~Hz, while it does not pose additional challenge for Newtonian Noise cancellation between 10--20~Hz.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
