-
Resolution Dependence of Cloud-Wind Simulations
Authors:
Hannah J. Leary,
Evan Schneider,
Helena M. Richie
Abstract:
Using a set of wind-tunnel simulations, we investigate the effect that numerical resolution has on cloud evolution and acceleration. We also consider the role of wind speed in both the subsonic and supersonic regimes, using adiabatic simulations with wind speeds of 100 km/s and 1000 km/s, respectively. For each setup, we explore five numerical resolutions. We find that the fate of the cloud is sig…
▽ More
Using a set of wind-tunnel simulations, we investigate the effect that numerical resolution has on cloud evolution and acceleration. We also consider the role of wind speed in both the subsonic and supersonic regimes, using adiabatic simulations with wind speeds of 100 km/s and 1000 km/s, respectively. For each setup, we explore five numerical resolutions. We find that the fate of the cloud is significantly affected by the resolution, but the trend is surprisingly non-monotonic. In the subsonic case, we find that a resolution of 16 cells per cloud radius is a turning point in the cloud evolution. In the supersonic case the trend is more monotonic, consistent with the difference in timescales for which ram pressure acceleration dominates over mixing in the early acceleration.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
-
Operating Spacecraft Around Comets: Evaluation of the Near-Nucleus Environment
Authors:
C. M. Lisse,
M. R. Combi,
T. L. Farnham,
N. Dello Russo,
S. Sandford,
A. F. Cheng,
U. Fink,
W. M. Harris,
J. McMahon,
D. J. Scheeres,
H. A. Weaver,
J. Leary
Abstract:
We present a study of the current state of knowledge concerning spacecraft operations and potential hazards while operating near a comet nucleus. Starting from simple calculations comparing the cometary coma environment to benign conditions on Earth, we progress to sophisticated engineering models of spacecraft behavior, and then confront these models with recent spacecraft proximity operations ex…
▽ More
We present a study of the current state of knowledge concerning spacecraft operations and potential hazards while operating near a comet nucleus. Starting from simple calculations comparing the cometary coma environment to benign conditions on Earth, we progress to sophisticated engineering models of spacecraft behavior, and then confront these models with recent spacecraft proximity operations experience. Finally, we make recommendations from lessons learned for future spacecraft missions that enter into orbit around a comet for long-term operations. All of these considerations indicate that, with a proper spacecraft design and operations planning, the near-nucleus environment can be a relatively safe region in which to operate, even for an active short period comet near perihelion with gas production rates as high as 1e29 molecules/s. With gas densities similar to those found in good laboratory vacuums, dust densities similar to Class 100 cleanrooms, dust particle velocities of 10s of m/s, and microgravity forces that permit slow and deliberate operations, the conditions around a comet are generally more benign than a typical day on Mars. Even in strong dust jets near the nucleus surface, dust densities tend to be only a few grains/cm3, about the same as in a typical interior room on Earth. Stochastic forces on a modern spacecraft with tens of square meters of projected surface area can be accounted for using modern Attitude Control Systems to within tens of meters navigation error; surface contamination issues are only important for spacecraft spending months to years within a few kilometers of the nucleus surface; and the issues the Rosetta spacecraft faced, confusion of celestial star trackers by sunlit dust particles flying past the spacecraft, will be addressed using the next generation of star trackers implementing improved transient rejection algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Persephone: A Pluto-System Orbiter and Kuiper Belt Explorer
Authors:
Carly Howett,
Stuart Robbins,
Bryan J. Holler,
Amanda Hendrix,
Karl Fielhauer,
Mark Perry,
Fazle Siddique,
Clint Apland,
James Leary,
S. Alan Stern,
Heather Elliott,
Francis Nimmo,
Simon B. Porter,
Silvia Protopapa,
Kelsi N. Singer,
Orenthal J. Tucker,
Anne J. Verbiscer,
Bruce Andrews,
Stewart Bushman,
Adam Crifasi,
Doug Crowley,
Clint Edwards,
Carolyn M. Ernst,
Blair Fonville,
David Frankford
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Persephone is a NASA concept mission study that addresses key questions raised by New Horizons' encounters with Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs), with arguably the most important being "Does Pluto have a subsurface ocean?". More broadly, Persephone would answer four significant science questions: (1) What are the internal structures of Pluto and Charon? (2) How have the surfaces and atmospheres in the P…
▽ More
Persephone is a NASA concept mission study that addresses key questions raised by New Horizons' encounters with Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs), with arguably the most important being "Does Pluto have a subsurface ocean?". More broadly, Persephone would answer four significant science questions: (1) What are the internal structures of Pluto and Charon? (2) How have the surfaces and atmospheres in the Pluto system evolved? (3) How has the KBO population evolved? (4) What are the particles and magnetic field environments of the Kuiper Belt? To answer these questions, Persephone has a comprehensive payload, and would both orbit within the Pluto system and encounter other KBOs. The nominal mission is 30.7 years long, with launch in 2031 on a Space Launch System (SLS) Block 2 rocket with a Centaur kick stage, followed by a 27.6 year cruise powered by existing radioisotope electric propulsion (REP) and a Jupiter gravity assist to reach Pluto in 2058. En route to Pluto, Persephone would have one 50- to 100-km-class KBO encounter before starting a 3.1 Earth-year orbital campaign of the Pluto system. The mission also includes the potential for an 8-year extended mission, which would enable the exploration of another KBO in the 100- to 150-km-size class. The mission payload includes 11 instruments: Panchromatic and Color High-Resolution Imager; Low-Light Camera; Ultra-Violet Spectrometer; Near-Infrared (IR) Spectrometer; Thermal IR Camera; Radio Frequency Spectrometer; Mass Spectrometer; Altimeter; Sounding Radar; Magnetometer; and Plasma Spectrometer. The nominal cost of this mission is $3.0B, making it a large strategic science mission.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
