A Review of NEST Models for Liquid Xenon and Exhaustive Comparison to Other Approaches
Authors:
M. Szydagis,
J. Balajthy,
G. A. Block,
J. P. Brodsky,
E. Brown,
J. E. Cutter,
S. J. Farrell,
J. Huang,
A. C. Kamaha,
E. S. Kozlova,
C. S. Liebenthal,
D. N. McKinsey,
K. McMichael,
R. McMonigle,
M. Mooney,
J. Mueller,
K. Ni,
G. R. C. Rischbieter,
K. Trengove,
M. Tripathi,
C. D. Tunnell,
V. Velan,
S. Westerdale,
M. D. Wyman,
Z. Zhao
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper will discuss the microphysical simulation of interactions in liquid xenon, the active detector medium in many leading rare-event searches for new physics, and describe experimental observables useful for understanding detector performance. The scintillation and ionization yield distributions for signal and background will be presented using the Noble Element Simulation Technique (NEST),…
▽ More
This paper will discuss the microphysical simulation of interactions in liquid xenon, the active detector medium in many leading rare-event searches for new physics, and describe experimental observables useful for understanding detector performance. The scintillation and ionization yield distributions for signal and background will be presented using the Noble Element Simulation Technique (NEST), which is a toolkit based on experimental data and simple, empirical formulae, which mimic previous microphysics modeling, but are guided by data. The NEST models for light and charge production as a function of the particle type, energy, and electric field will be reviewed, as well as models for energy resolution and final pulse areas. NEST will be compared to other models or sets of models, and vetted against real data, with several specific examples pulled from XENON, ZEPLIN, LUX, LZ, PandaX, and table-top experiments used for calibrations.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2024; v1 submitted 19 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
A Review of Basic Energy Reconstruction Techniques in Liquid Xenon and Argon Detectors for Dark Matter and Neutrino Physics Using NEST
Authors:
M. Szydagis,
G. A. Block,
C. Farquhar,
A. J. Flesher,
E. S. Kozlova,
C. Levy,
E. A. Mangus,
M. Mooney,
J. Mueller,
G. R. C. Rischbieter,
A. K. Schwartz
Abstract:
Detectors based upon the noble elements, especially liquid xenon as well as liquid argon, as both single- and dual-phase types, require reconstruction of the energies of interacting particles, both in the field of direct detection of dark matter (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles or WIMPs, axions, etc.) and in neutrino physics. Experimentalists, as well as theorists who reanalyze/reinterpret ex…
▽ More
Detectors based upon the noble elements, especially liquid xenon as well as liquid argon, as both single- and dual-phase types, require reconstruction of the energies of interacting particles, both in the field of direct detection of dark matter (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles or WIMPs, axions, etc.) and in neutrino physics. Experimentalists, as well as theorists who reanalyze/reinterpret experimental data, have used a few different techniques over the past few decades. In this paper, we review techniques based on solely the primary scintillation channel, the ionization or secondary channel available at non-zero drift electric fields, and combined techniques that include a simple linear combination and weighted averages, with a brief discussion of the applications of profile likelihood, maximum likelihood, and machine learning. Comparing results for electron recoils (beta and gamma interactions) and nuclear recoils (primarily from neutrons) from the Noble Element Simulation Technique (NEST) simulation to available data, we confirm that combining all available information generates higher-precision means, lower widths (energy resolution), and more symmetric shapes (approximately Gaussian) especially at keV-scale energies, with the symmetry even greater when thresholding is addressed. Near thresholds, bias from upward fluctuations matters. For MeV-GeV scales, if only one channel is utilized, an ionization-only-based energy scale outperforms scintillation; channel combination remains beneficial. We discuss here what major collaborations use.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2021; v1 submitted 19 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
