Skip to main content

Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Jackson, A D

Searching in archive astro-ph. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:1903.02401  [pdf, other

    astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE

    Noise residuals for GW150914 using maximum likelihood and numerical relativity templates

    Authors: Andrew D. Jackson, Hao Liu, Pavel Naselsky

    Abstract: We reexamine the results presented in a recent work by Nielsen et al. [1], in which the properties of the noise residuals in the 40\,ms chirp domain of GW150914 were investigated. This paper confirmed the presence of strong (i.e., about 0.80) correlations between residual noise in the Hanford and Livingston detectors in the chirp domain as previously seen by us [2] when using a numerical relativit… ▽ More

    Submitted 13 May, 2019; v1 submitted 6 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

    Comments: Minor corrections

    Journal ref: JCAP05(2019)014

  2. Degeneracy of gravitational waveforms in the context of GW150914

    Authors: James Creswell, Hao Liu, Andrew D. Jackson, Sebastian von Hausegger, Pavel Naselsky

    Abstract: We study the degeneracy of theoretical gravitational waveforms for binary black hole mergers using an aligned-spin effective-one-body model. After appropriate truncation, bandpassing, and matching, we identify regions in the mass--spin parameter space containing waveforms similar to the template proposed for GW150914, with masses $m_1 = 36^{+5}_{-4} M_\odot$ and $m_2 = 29^{+4}_{-4} M_\odot$, using… ▽ More

    Submitted 6 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

    Comments: Accepted for publication in JCAP

    Journal ref: JCAP03(2018)007

  3. A blind search for a common signal in gravitational wave detectors

    Authors: Hao Liu, James Creswell, Sebastian von Hausegger, Andrew D. Jackson, Pavel Naselsky

    Abstract: We propose a blind, template-free method for the extraction of a common signal between the Hanford and Livingston detectors and apply it especially to the GW150914 event. We construct a log-likelihood method that maximizes the cross-correlation between each detector and the common signal and minimizes the cross-correlation between the residuals. The reliability of this method is tested using simul… ▽ More

    Submitted 31 January, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

    Comments: Accepted for publication in JCAP

  4. On the time lags of the LIGO signals

    Authors: James Creswell, Sebastian von Hausegger, Andrew D. Jackson, Hao Liu, Pavel Naselsky

    Abstract: To date, the LIGO collaboration has detected three gravitational wave (GW) events appearing in both its Hanford and Livingston detectors. In this article we reexamine the LIGO data with regard to correlations between the two detectors. With special focus on GW150914, we report correlations in the detector noise which, at the time of the event, happen to be maximized for the same time lag as that f… ▽ More

    Submitted 9 August, 2017; v1 submitted 13 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

    Comments: The body of the current version is essentially identical to the previous one submitted to arxiv and JCAP. In order to meet the various suggestions of the referees, we have included an extended and detailed Appendix. This Appendix also contains significant new results that provide additional support for our conclusions. This version of our manuscript has been accepted for publication by JCAP

  5. arXiv:1609.08346  [pdf, other

    astro-ph.IM astro-ph.CO gr-qc

    Possible associated signal with GW150914 in the LIGO data

    Authors: Hao Liu, Andrew D. Jackson

    Abstract: We present a simple method for the identification of weak signals associated with gravitational wave events. Its application reveals a signal with the same time lag as the GW150914 event in the released LIGO strain data with a significance around $3.2σ$. This signal starts about 10 minutes before GW150914 and lasts for about 45 minutes. Subsequent tests suggest that this signal is likely to be due… ▽ More

    Submitted 27 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

    Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures

  6. arXiv:1604.06211  [pdf, other

    astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM hep-th

    Understanding the LIGO GW150914 event

    Authors: P. Naselsky, A. D. Jackson, Hao Liu

    Abstract: We present a simplified method for the extraction of meaningful signals from Hanford and Livingstone 32 seconds data for the GW150914 event made publicly available by the LIGO collaboration and demonstrate its ability to reproduce the LIGO collaboration's own results quantitatively given the assumption that all narrow peaks in the power spectrum are a consequence of physically uninteresting signal… ▽ More

    Submitted 9 August, 2016; v1 submitted 21 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

    Comments: 10 figures

  7. Skewness and Kurtosis as Indicators of Non-Gaussianity in Galactic Foreground Maps

    Authors: Assaf Ben-David, Sebastian von Hausegger, Andrew D. Jackson

    Abstract: Observational cosmology is entering an era in which high precision will be required in both measurement and data analysis. Accuracy, however, can only be achieved with a thorough understanding of potential sources of contamination from foreground effects. Our primary focus will be on non- Gaussian effects in foregrounds. This issue will be crucial for coming experiments to determine B-mode polariz… ▽ More

    Submitted 18 November, 2015; v1 submitted 10 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

    Comments: 15 pages, 7 figures, minor change, as published in JCAP

    Journal ref: JCAP 11 (2015) 019

  8. The Kullback-Leibler Divergence as an Estimator of the Statistical Properties of CMB Maps

    Authors: Assaf Ben-David, Hao Liu, Andrew D. Jackson

    Abstract: The identification of unsubtracted foreground residuals in the cosmic microwave background maps on large scales is of crucial importance for the analysis of polarization signals. These residuals add a non-Gaussian contribution to the data. We propose the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence as an effective, non-parametric test on the one-point probability distribution function of the data. With motiva… ▽ More

    Submitted 3 July, 2015; v1 submitted 25 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

    Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures, minor change, as published in JCAP

    Journal ref: JCAP 06 (2015) 051