-
The globular cluster system of the Auriga simulations
Authors:
Timo L. R. Halbesma,
Robert J. J. Grand,
Facundo A. Gómez,
Federico Marinacci,
Rüdiger Pakmor,
Wilma H. Trick,
Philipp Busch,
Simon D. M. White
Abstract:
We investigate whether the galaxy and star formation model used for the Auriga simulations can produce a realistic globular cluster (GC) population. We compare statistics of GC candidate star particles in the Auriga haloes with catalogues of the Milky Way (MW) and Andromeda (M31) GC populations. We find that the Auriga simulations do produce sufficient stellar mass for GC candidates at radii and m…
▽ More
We investigate whether the galaxy and star formation model used for the Auriga simulations can produce a realistic globular cluster (GC) population. We compare statistics of GC candidate star particles in the Auriga haloes with catalogues of the Milky Way (MW) and Andromeda (M31) GC populations. We find that the Auriga simulations do produce sufficient stellar mass for GC candidates at radii and metallicities that are typical for the MW GC system (GCS). We also find varying mass-ratios of the simulated GC candidates relative to the observed mass in the MW and M31 GC systems for different bins of galactocentric radius-metallicity (r$_{\text{gal}}$ -[Fe/H]). Overall, the Auriga simulations produce GC candidates with higher metallicities than the MW and M31 GCS and they are found at larger radii than observed. The Auriga simulations would require bound cluster formation efficiencies higher than ten percent for the metal-poor GC candidates, and those within the Solar radius should experience negligible destruction rates to be consistent with observations. GC candidates in the outer halo, on the other hand, should either have low formation efficiencies, or experience high mass loss for the Auriga simulations to produce a GCS that is consistent with that of the MW or M31. Finally, the scatter in the metallicity as well as in the radial distribution between different Auriga runs is considerably smaller than the differences between that of the MW and M31 GCSs. The Auriga model is unlikely to give rise to a GCS that can be consistent with both galaxies.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2020; v1 submitted 5 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
WVTICs -- SPH initial conditions for everyone
Authors:
Alexander Arth,
Julius Donnert,
Ulrich Steinwandel,
Ludwig Böss,
Timo Halbesma,
Martin Pütz,
David Hubber,
Klaus Dolag
Abstract:
We present a novel and fast application to generate glass-like initial conditions for Lagrangian hydrodynamic schemes (e.g. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)) following arbitrary density models based on weighted Voronoi tessellations and combine it with improved initial configurations and an additional particle reshuffling scheme. We show our application's ability to sample different kinds of…
▽ More
We present a novel and fast application to generate glass-like initial conditions for Lagrangian hydrodynamic schemes (e.g. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)) following arbitrary density models based on weighted Voronoi tessellations and combine it with improved initial configurations and an additional particle reshuffling scheme. We show our application's ability to sample different kinds of density features and to converge properly towards the given model density as well as a glass-like particle configuration. We analyse convergence with iterations as well as with varying particle number. Additionally, we demonstrate the versatility of the implemented algorithms by providing an extensive test suite for standard (magneto-) hydrodynamic test cases as well as a few common astrophysical applications. We indicate the potential to bridge further between observational astronomy and simulations as well as applicability to other fields of science by advanced features such as describing a density model using gridded data for exampling from an image file instead of an analytic model.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2019; v1 submitted 25 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Simulations of the merging cluster of galaxies Cygnus A
Authors:
Timo Halbesma,
Julius Donnert,
Martijn de Vries,
Michael Wise
Abstract:
The archetype FR-II galaxy Cygnus A lies in a moderately rich cluster about to undergo a major merger. We study the pre-merger Cygnus cluster environment using smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations constrained by 2Ms of Chandra observations of the hot intracluster medium. The observations constrain the total gravitating mass and concentration parameter, and the simulations provide the quiesc…
▽ More
The archetype FR-II galaxy Cygnus A lies in a moderately rich cluster about to undergo a major merger. We study the pre-merger Cygnus cluster environment using smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations constrained by 2Ms of Chandra observations of the hot intracluster medium. The observations constrain the total gravitating mass and concentration parameter, and the simulations provide the quiescent and merger-enhanced temperature profiles of the pre- and post merger of the cluster excluding the central active galactic nucleus. We present the first detailed model of the sub cluster north west of Cygnus A, named CygNW. We find a lower baryon fraction and higher concentration parameter for CygA than expected from known scaling relations in the literature. The model suggests the Cygnus cluster hosts a pre-merger with a progenitor mass ratio of about 1.5:1 at the virial radius. We notice that the intra cluster medium is heated as a result of the merger, but we find no evidence for a (pre-)merger shock in the interstitial region between both cluster haloes. We attribute the merger-induced heating to compression of the cluster outskirts. The smooth model obtained from our simulations is subtracted from the observed cluster state and shows residual temperature structure that is neither hydrostatic nor merger-heated cluster gas. We speculate that this residual heating may result from previous AGN activity over the last ~100 Myr.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.