Observation of Fermi acceleration with cold atoms
Authors:
G. Barontini,
V. Naniyil,
J. P. Stinton,
D. Reid,
J. M. F. Gunn,
H. M. Price,
A. B. Deb,
D. Caprioli,
V. Guarrera
Abstract:
Cosmic rays are deemed to be generated by a process known as ``Fermi acceleration", in which charged particles scatter against magnetic fluctuations in astrophysical plasmas. The process itself is however universal, has both classical and quantum formulations, and is at the basis of dynamical systems with interesting mathematical properties, such as the celebrated Fermi-Ulam model. Despite its eff…
▽ More
Cosmic rays are deemed to be generated by a process known as ``Fermi acceleration", in which charged particles scatter against magnetic fluctuations in astrophysical plasmas. The process itself is however universal, has both classical and quantum formulations, and is at the basis of dynamical systems with interesting mathematical properties, such as the celebrated Fermi-Ulam model. Despite its effectiveness in accelerating particles, Fermi acceleration has so far eluded unambiguous verifications in laboratory settings. Here, we realize the first fully controllable Fermi accelerator by colliding ultracold atoms against engineered movable potential barriers. We demonstrate that our Fermi accelerator, which is only 100 um in size, can produce ultracold atomic jets with velocities above half a meter per second. Adding dissipation, we also experimentally test Bell's general argument for the ensuing energy spectra, which is at the basis of any model of cosmic ray acceleration. On the one hand, our work effectively opens the window to the study of high energy astrophysics with cold atoms, offering new capabilities for the understanding of phenomena such as diffusive acceleration at collisionless shocks. On the other, the performance of our Fermi accelerator is competitive with those of best-in-class accelerating methods used in quantum technology and quantum colliders, but with substantially simpler implementation and virtually no upper limit.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
Derived electron densities from linear polarization observations of the visible-light corona during the 14 December 2020 total solar eclipse
Authors:
Liam T. Edwards,
Kaine A. Bunting,
Brad Ramsey,
Matthew Gunn,
Tomos Fearn,
Thomas Knight,
Gabriel Domingo Muro,
Huw Morgan
Abstract:
A new instrument was designed to take visible-light (VL) polarized brightness ($pB$) observations of the solar corona during the 14 December 2020 total solar eclipse. The instrument, called the Coronal Imaging Polarizer (CIP), consisted of a 16 MP CMOS detector, a linear polarizer housed within a piezoelectric rotation mount, and an f-5.6, 200 mm DSLR lens. Observations were successfully obtained,…
▽ More
A new instrument was designed to take visible-light (VL) polarized brightness ($pB$) observations of the solar corona during the 14 December 2020 total solar eclipse. The instrument, called the Coronal Imaging Polarizer (CIP), consisted of a 16 MP CMOS detector, a linear polarizer housed within a piezoelectric rotation mount, and an f-5.6, 200 mm DSLR lens. Observations were successfully obtained, despite poor weather conditions, for five different exposure times (0.001 s, 0.01 s, 0.1 s, 1 s, and 3 s) at six different orientation angles of the linear polarizer (0\de, 30\de, 60\de, 90\de, 120\de, and 150\de). The images were manually aligned using the drift of background stars in the sky and images of different exposure times were combined using a simple signal-to-noise ratio cut. The polarization and brightness of the local sky is also estimated and the observations were subsequently corrected. The $pB$ of the K-corona was determined using least squares fitting and radiometric calibration was done relative to the Mauna Loa Solar Observatory (MLSO) K-Cor $pB$ observations from the day of the eclipse. The $pB$ data was then inverted to acquire the coronal electron density, $n_e$, for an equatorial streamer and a polar coronal hole, which agreed very well with previous studies. The effect of changing the number of polarizer angles used to compute the $pB$ is also discussed and it is found that the results vary by up to $\sim$ 13\% when using all six polarizer angles versus only a select three angles.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
