Life-Detection Technologies for the Next Two Decades
Authors:
Chaitanya Giri,
Tony Z. Jia,
H. James Cleaves II,
Tomohiro Usui,
Dhananjay Bodas,
Christopher Carr,
Huan Chen,
Yuka Fujii,
Yoshihiro Furukawa,
Hidenori Genda,
Richard J. Gillams,
Keiko Hamano,
Shingo Kameda,
Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy,
Cornelia Meinert,
Markus Meringer,
Kishore Paknikar,
Sudha Rajamani,
Sisinthy Shivaji,
Andrew Steele,
Masateru Taniguchi,
Hikaru Yabuta,
Akihiko Yamagishi
Abstract:
Since its inception six decades ago, astrobiology has diversified immensely to encompass several scientific questions including the origin and evolution of Terran life, the organic chemical composition of extraterrestrial objects, and the concept of habitability, among others. The detection of life beyond Earth forms the main goal of astrobiology, and a significant one for space exploration in gen…
▽ More
Since its inception six decades ago, astrobiology has diversified immensely to encompass several scientific questions including the origin and evolution of Terran life, the organic chemical composition of extraterrestrial objects, and the concept of habitability, among others. The detection of life beyond Earth forms the main goal of astrobiology, and a significant one for space exploration in general. This goal has galvanized and connected with other critical areas of investigation such as the analysis of meteorites and early Earth geological and biological systems, materials gathered by sample-return space missions, laboratory and computer simulations of extraterrestrial and early Earth environmental chemistry, astronomical remote sensing, and in-situ space exploration missions. Lately, scattered efforts are being undertaken towards the R&D of the novel and as-yet-space-unproven life-detection technologies capable of obtaining unambiguous evidence of extraterrestrial life, even if it is significantly different from Terran life. As the suite of space-proven payloads improves in breadth and sensitivity, this is an apt time to examine the progress and future of life-detection technologies.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
Decay of COSAC and Ptolemy Mass Spectra at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Authors:
Harald Krüger,
Fred Goesmann,
Chaitanya Giri,
Ian Wright,
Andrew Morse,
Jan Hendrik Bredehöft,
Stephan Ulamec,
Barbara Cozzoni,
Pascale Ehrenfreund,
Thomas Gautier,
Susan McKenna-Lawlor,
Francois Raulin,
Harald Steininger,
Cyril Szopa
Abstract:
The Rosetta lander Philae successfully landed on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 12 November 2014. Philae is equipped with two gas analyzers: The Cometary Sampling and Composition experiment (COSAC) and the gas chromatograph and mass spectrometer Ptolemy. On 12 to 14 November 2014 both instruments measured the organic composition of the comet nucleus material through seven measur…
▽ More
The Rosetta lander Philae successfully landed on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 12 November 2014. Philae is equipped with two gas analyzers: The Cometary Sampling and Composition experiment (COSAC) and the gas chromatograph and mass spectrometer Ptolemy. On 12 to 14 November 2014 both instruments measured the organic composition of the comet nucleus material through seven measurements in sniffing mode during Philae's hopping and at its final landing site Abydos. We compare the temporal evolution of intensities of several ion species identified by both mass spectrometers. For COSAC this is the first analysis of the temporal behaviour of the measured ion species. All ion species showed the highest intensities in the first spectra measured by both instruments about 20 to 30 minutes after Philae's first touchdown at Agilkia, and a decay during the six consecutive measurements at Abydos. Both instruments measured a nearly identical decay of the water peak (m/z 18), and also CO (m/z 28) behaved similarly. In the COSAC measurements the peak at m/z 44 decays much slower than all the other ion species, including the water peak. In particular, the m/z 44 peak decays much slower in the COSAC measurements than in the Ptolemy data. This supports our earlier interpretation that COSAC for the first time analyzed a regolith sample from a cometary nucleus in situ, while Ptolemy measured cometary gas from the ambient coma. The m/z 44 peak measured by COSAC was likely dominated by organic species, whereas the peak measured by Ptolemy was interpreted to be mostly due to $CO_2$. Ion species heavier than m/z 30 tend to decay somewhat slower in the COSAC measurements than in the Ptolemy data, which may be related to differences in the exhaust designs between both instruments.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
