-
Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1). First detections from the galaxy cluster workflow
Authors:
Euclid Collaboration,
S. Bhargava,
C. Benoist,
A. H. Gonzalez,
M. Maturi,
J. -B. Melin,
S. A. Stanford,
E. Munari,
M. Vannier,
C. Murray,
S. Maurogordato,
A. Biviano,
J. Macias-Perez,
J. G. Bartlett,
F. Pacaud,
A. Widmer,
M. Meneghetti,
B. Sartoris,
M. Aguena,
G. Alguero,
S. Andreon,
S. Bardelli,
L. Baumont,
M. Bolzonella,
R. Cabanac
, et al. (329 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The first survey data release by the Euclid mission covers approximately $63\,\mathrm{deg^2}$ in the Euclid Deep Fields to the same depth as the Euclid Wide Survey. This paper showcases, for the first time, the performance of cluster finders on Euclid data and presents examples of validated clusters in the Quick Release 1 (Q1) imaging data. We identify clusters using two algorithms (AMICO and PZWa…
▽ More
The first survey data release by the Euclid mission covers approximately $63\,\mathrm{deg^2}$ in the Euclid Deep Fields to the same depth as the Euclid Wide Survey. This paper showcases, for the first time, the performance of cluster finders on Euclid data and presents examples of validated clusters in the Quick Release 1 (Q1) imaging data. We identify clusters using two algorithms (AMICO and PZWav) implemented in the Euclid cluster-detection pipeline. We explore the internal consistency of detections from the two codes, and cross-match detections with known clusters from other surveys using external multi-wavelength and spectroscopic data sets. This enables assessment of the Euclid photometric redshift accuracy and also of systematics such as mis-centring between the optical cluster centre and centres based on X-ray and/or Sunyaev--Zeldovich observations. We report 426 joint PZWav and AMICO-detected clusters with high signal-to-noise ratios over the full Q1 area in the redshift range $0.2 \leq z \leq 1.5$. The chosen redshift and signal-to-noise thresholds are motivated by the photometric quality of the early Euclid data. We provide richness estimates for each of the Euclid-detected clusters and show its correlation with various external cluster mass proxies. Out of the full sample, 77 systems are potentially new to the literature. Overall, the Q1 cluster catalogue demonstrates a successful validation of the workflow ahead of the Euclid Data Release 1, based on the consistency of internal and external properties of Euclid-detected clusters.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
DAXA: Traversing the X-ray desert by Democratising Archival X-ray Astronomy
Authors:
David J. Turner,
Jessica E. Pilling,
Megan Donahue,
Paul A. Giles,
Kathy Romer,
Agrim Gupta,
Toby Wallage,
Ray Wang
Abstract:
We introduce a new, open-source, Python module for the acquisition and processing of archival data from many X-ray telescopes - Democratising Archival X-ray Astronomy (hereafter referred to as DAXA). Our software is built to increase access to, and use of, large archives of X-ray astronomy data; providing a unified, easy-to-use, Python interface to the disparate archives and processing tools. We p…
▽ More
We introduce a new, open-source, Python module for the acquisition and processing of archival data from many X-ray telescopes - Democratising Archival X-ray Astronomy (hereafter referred to as DAXA). Our software is built to increase access to, and use of, large archives of X-ray astronomy data; providing a unified, easy-to-use, Python interface to the disparate archives and processing tools. We provide this interface for the majority of X-ray telescopes launched within the last 30 years. This module enables much greater access to X-ray data for non-specialists, while preserving low-level control of processing for X-ray experts. It is useful for identifying relevant observations of a single object of interest but it excels at creating multi-mission datasets for serendipitous or targeted studies of large samples of X-ray emitting objects. The management and organization of datasets is also made easier; DAXA archives can be version controlled and updated if new data become available. Once relevant observations are identified, the raw data can be downloaded (and optionally processed) through DAXA, or pre-processed event lists, images, and exposure maps can be downloaded if they are available. X-ray observations are perfectly suited to serendipitous discoveries and archival analyses, and with a decade-long `X-ray desert' potentially on the horizon archival data will take on even greater importance; enhanced access to those archives will be vital to the continuation of X-ray astronomy.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey: Automating the estimation of hydrostatic mass for large samples of galaxy clusters I -- Methodology, Validation, & Application to the SDSSRM-XCS sample
Authors:
D. J. Turner,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
J. Pilling,
T. K. Lingard,
R. Wilkinson,
M. Hilton,
E. W. Upsdell,
R. Al-Serkal,
T. Cheng,
R. Eappen,
P. J. Rooney,
S. Bhargava,
C. A. Collins,
J. Mayers,
C. Miller,
R. C. Nichol,
M. Sahén,
P. T. P. Viana
Abstract:
We describe features of the X-ray: Generate and Analyse (XGA) open-source software package that have been developed to facilitate automated hydrostatic mass ($M_{\rm hydro}$) measurements from XMM X-ray observations of clusters of galaxies. This includes describing how XGA measures global, and radial, X-ray properties of galaxy clusters. We then demonstrate the reliability of XGA by comparing simp…
▽ More
We describe features of the X-ray: Generate and Analyse (XGA) open-source software package that have been developed to facilitate automated hydrostatic mass ($M_{\rm hydro}$) measurements from XMM X-ray observations of clusters of galaxies. This includes describing how XGA measures global, and radial, X-ray properties of galaxy clusters. We then demonstrate the reliability of XGA by comparing simple X-ray properties, namely the X-ray temperature and gas mass, with published values presented by the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS), the Ultimate XMM eXtragaLactic survey project (XXL), and the Local Cluster Substructure Survey (LoCuSS). XGA measured values for temperature are, on average, within 1% of the values reported in the literature for each sample. XGA gas masses for XXL clusters are shown to be ${\sim}$10% lower than previous measurements (though the difference is only significant at the $\sim$1.8$σ$ level), LoCuSS $R_{2500}$ and $R_{500}$ gas mass re-measurements are 3% and 7% lower respectively (representing a 1.5$σ$ and 3.5$σ$ difference). Like-for-like comparisons of hydrostatic mass are made to LoCuSS results, which show that our measurements are $10{\pm}3%$ ($19{\pm}7%$) higher for $R_{2500}$ ($R_{500}$). The comparison between $R_{500}$ masses shows significant scatter. Finally, we present new $M_{\rm hydro}$ measurements for 104 clusters from the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer XCS sample (SDSSRM-XCS). Our SDSSRM-XCS hydrostatic mass measurements are in good agreement with multiple literature estimates, and represent one of the largest samples of consistently measured hydrostatic masses. We have demonstrated that XGA is a powerful tool for X-ray analysis of clusters; it will render complex-to-measure X-ray properties accessible to non-specialists.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey: Exploring scaling relations and completeness of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 redMaPPer cluster catalogue
Authors:
E. W. Upsdell,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
D. J. Turner,
M. Hilton,
E. Rykoff,
A. Farahi,
S. Bhargava,
T. Jeltema,
M. Klein,
A. Bermeo,
C. A. Collins,
L. Ebrahimpour,
D. Hollowood,
R. G. Mann,
M. Manolopoulou,
C. J. Miller,
P. J. Rooney,
Martin Sahlén,
J. P. Stott,
P. T. P. Viana,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
D. Bacon
, et al. (45 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We cross-match and compare characteristics of galaxy clusters identified in observations from two sky surveys using two completely different techniques. One sample is optically selected from the analysis of three years of Dark Energy Survey observations using the redMaPPer cluster detection algorithm. The second is X-ray selected from XMM observations analysed by the XMM Cluster Survey. The sample…
▽ More
We cross-match and compare characteristics of galaxy clusters identified in observations from two sky surveys using two completely different techniques. One sample is optically selected from the analysis of three years of Dark Energy Survey observations using the redMaPPer cluster detection algorithm. The second is X-ray selected from XMM observations analysed by the XMM Cluster Survey. The samples comprise a total area of 57.4 deg$^2$, bounded by the area of 4 contiguous XMM survey regions that overlap the DES footprint. We find that the X-ray selected sample is fully matched with entries in the redMaPPer catalogue, above $λ>$20 and within 0.1$< z <$0.9. Conversely, only 38\% of the redMaPPer catalogue is matched to an X-ray extended source. Next, using 120 optically clusters and 184 X-ray selected clusters, we investigate the form of the X-ray luminosity-temperature ($L_{X}-T_{X}$), luminosity-richness ($L_{X}-λ$) and temperature-richness ($T_{X}-λ$) scaling relations. We find that the fitted forms of the $L_{X}-T_{X}$ relations are consistent between the two selection methods and also with other studies in the literature. However, we find tentative evidence for a steepening of the slope of the relation for low richness systems in the X-ray selected sample. When considering the scaling of richness with X-ray properties, we again find consistency in the relations (i.e., $L_{X}-λ$ and $T_{X}-λ$) between the optical and X-ray selected samples. This is contrary to previous similar works that find a significant increase in the scatter of the luminosity scaling relation for X-ray selected samples compared to optically selected samples.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey analysis of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalogue: Implications for scatter, selection bias, and isotropy in cluster scaling relations
Authors:
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
A. Bermeo,
D. J. Turner,
M. Hilton,
E. W. Upsdell,
P. J. Rooney,
S. Bhargava,
L. Ebrahimpour,
A. Farahi,
R. G. Mann,
M. Manolopoulou,
J. Mayers,
C. Vergara,
P. T. P. Viana,
C. A. Collins,
D. Hollowood,
T. Jeltema,
C. J. Miller,
R. C. Nichol,
R. Noorali,
M. Splettstoesser,
J. P. Stott
Abstract:
In this paper we present the X-ray analysis of SDSS DR8 redMaPPer (SDSSRM) clusters using data products from the $XMM$ Cluster Survey (XCS). In total, 1189 SDSSRM clusters fall within the $XMM$-Newton footprint. This has yielded 456 confirmed detections accompanied by X-ray luminosity ($L_{X}$) measurements. Of the detected clusters, 382 have an associated X-ray temperature measurement ($T_{X}$).…
▽ More
In this paper we present the X-ray analysis of SDSS DR8 redMaPPer (SDSSRM) clusters using data products from the $XMM$ Cluster Survey (XCS). In total, 1189 SDSSRM clusters fall within the $XMM$-Newton footprint. This has yielded 456 confirmed detections accompanied by X-ray luminosity ($L_{X}$) measurements. Of the detected clusters, 382 have an associated X-ray temperature measurement ($T_{X}$). This represents one of the largest samples of coherently derived cluster $T_{X}$ values to date. Our analysis of the X-ray observable to richness ($λ$) scaling relations has demonstrated that scatter in the $T_{X}-λ$ relation is roughly a third of that in the $L_{X}-λ$ relation, and that the $L_{X}-λ$ scatter is intrinsic, i.e. will not be significantly reduced with larger sample sizes. Our analysis of the scaling relation between $L_{X}$ and $T_{X}$ has shown that the fits are sensitive to the selection method of the sample, i.e. whether the sample is made up of clusters detected "serendipitously" compared to those deliberately targeted by $XMM$. These differences are also seen in the $L_{X}-λ$ relation and, to a lesser extent, in the $T_{X}-λ$ relation. Exclusion of the emission from the cluster core does not make a significant impact to the findings. A combination of selection biases is a likely, but as yet unproven, reason for these differences. Finally, we have also used our data to probe recent claims of anisotropy in the $L_{X}-T_{X}$ relation across the sky. We find no evidence of anistropy, but stress that this may be masked in our analysis by the incomplete declination coverage of the SDSS DR8 sample.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2022; v1 submitted 22 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
XGA: A module for the large-scale scientific exploitation of archival X-ray astronomy data
Authors:
D. J. Turner,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
V. Korbina
Abstract:
The XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) have developed a new Python module, X-ray: Generate and Analyse (XGA) to provide interactive and automated analyses of X-ray emitting sources observed by the XMM-Newton space telescope. XGA only requires that a set of cleaned, processed, event lists has been created, and (optionally) that a source detector has generated region lists for the observations. XGA is centere…
▽ More
The XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) have developed a new Python module, X-ray: Generate and Analyse (XGA) to provide interactive and automated analyses of X-ray emitting sources observed by the XMM-Newton space telescope. XGA only requires that a set of cleaned, processed, event lists has been created, and (optionally) that a source detector has generated region lists for the observations. XGA is centered around the concept of making all available data easily accessible and analysable. The user provides information (e.g. RA, Dec, redshift) on the source they wish to investigate, and XGA locates relevant observations and generates required data products. This allows the user to quickly and easily complete common analyses using all relevant observations, thus being left free to focus on extracting the maximum scientific gain. XGA is centered around source and sample classes, which represent different types of X-ray emitting astrophysical objects and have different properties and methods relevant to that type of object. XGA also contains product classes, which provide interfaces to X-ray data products or information (such as radial profiles) that have been derived from them, with built-in methods for fitting, analysis, and visualisation. XGA can fit models to spectra (both global and annular) with XSPEC, measuring spectral properties such as temperature, photon index, and luminosity. XGA can also measure radial profiles of density and temperature for galaxy clusters, allowing the measurement of gas and total mass profiles of galaxy clusters. In the future, we will add support for X-ray telescopes other than XMM (e.g. Chandra, eROSITA), as well as the ability to perform multi-mission joint analyses. With the advent of new X-ray observatories such as eROSITA, XRISM, ATHENA, and Lynx, it is the perfect time for a new, open-source, software package that is open for anyone to use and scrutinise.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2022; v1 submitted 2 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Dwarf AGNs from Optical Variability for the Origins of Seeds (DAVOS): Insights from the Dark Energy Survey Deep Fields
Authors:
Colin J. Burke,
Xin Liu,
Yue Shen,
Kedar A. Phadke,
Qian Yang,
Will G. Hartley,
Ian Harrison,
Antonella Palmese,
Hengxiao Guo,
Kaiwen Zhang,
Richard Kron,
David J. Turner,
Paul A. Giles,
Christopher Lidman,
Yu-Ching Chen,
Robert A. Gruendl,
Ami Choi,
Alexandra Amon,
Erin Sheldon,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
D. Bacon,
E. Bertin,
D. Brooks
, et al. (47 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a sample of 706, $z < 1.5$ active galactic nuclei (AGNs) selected from optical photometric variability in three of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) deep fields (E2, C3, and X3) over an area of 4.64 deg$^2$. We construct light curves using difference imaging aperture photometry for resolved sources and non-difference imaging PSF photometry for unresolved sources, respectively, and characteri…
▽ More
We present a sample of 706, $z < 1.5$ active galactic nuclei (AGNs) selected from optical photometric variability in three of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) deep fields (E2, C3, and X3) over an area of 4.64 deg$^2$. We construct light curves using difference imaging aperture photometry for resolved sources and non-difference imaging PSF photometry for unresolved sources, respectively, and characterize the variability significance. Our DES light curves have a mean cadence of 7 days, a 6 year baseline, and a single-epoch imaging depth of up to $g \sim 24.5$. Using spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting, we find 26 out of total 706 variable galaxies are consistent with dwarf galaxies with a reliable stellar mass estimate ($M_{\ast}<10^{9.5}\ M_\odot$; median photometric redshift of 0.9). We were able to constrain rapid characteristic variability timescales ($\sim$ weeks) using the DES light curves in 15 dwarf AGN candidates (a subset of our variable AGN candidates) at a median photometric redshift of 0.4. This rapid variability is consistent with their low black hole masses. We confirm the low-mass AGN nature of one source with a high S/N optical spectrum. We publish our catalog, optical light curves, and supplementary data, such as X-ray properties and optical spectra, when available. We measure a variable AGN fraction versus stellar mass and compare to results from a forward model. This work demonstrates the feasibility of optical variability to identify AGNs with lower black hole masses in deep fields, which may be more "pristine" analogs of supermassive black hole seeds.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2022; v1 submitted 4 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey: An independent demonstration of the fidelity of the eFEDS galaxy cluster data products and implications for future studies
Authors:
D. J. Turner,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
E. W. Upsdell,
M. Klein,
P. T. P. Viana,
M. Hilton,
S. Bhargava,
C. A. Collins,
R. G. Mann,
M. Sahlén,
J. P. Stott
Abstract:
We present the first comparison between properties of clusters of galaxies detected by the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) and the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS). We have compared, in an ensemble fashion, properties from the eFEDS X-ray cluster catalogue with those from the Ultimate XMM eXtragaLactic (XXL) survey project (XXL-100-GC). We find the distributions of redshift and X-ray tempera…
▽ More
We present the first comparison between properties of clusters of galaxies detected by the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) and the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS). We have compared, in an ensemble fashion, properties from the eFEDS X-ray cluster catalogue with those from the Ultimate XMM eXtragaLactic (XXL) survey project (XXL-100-GC). We find the distributions of redshift and X-ray temperature ($T_{\rm X}$) to be broadly similar between the two surveys, with a larger proportion of clusters above 4 keV in the XXL-100-GC sample. We find 62 eFEDS cluster candidates with XMM data (eFEDS-XMM sample); 10 do not have good enough XMM data to confirm or deny, 11 are classed as sample contaminants, and 4 have their X-ray flux contaminated by another source. The majority of eFEDS-XMM sources have a longer exposure in XMM than eFEDS, and the majority of eFEDS positions are within 100 kpc of XCS positions. Our eFEDS-XCS sample of 37 clusters is used to calculate minimum sample contamination fractions of ${\sim}$18% and ${\sim}$9% in the eFEDS X-ray and optically confirmed samples respectively, in general agreement with eFEDS findings. We compare 29 X-ray luminosities ($L_{\rm X}$) measured by eFEDS and XCS, which are in excellent agreement. Eight clusters have a $T_{\rm X}$ measured by XMM and eROSITA, and we find that XMM temperatures are 25$\pm$9% larger than their eROSITA counterparts. Finally, we construct $L_{\rm X}$ - $T_{\rm X}$ scaling relations based on eFEDS and XCS measurements, which are in tension; the tension is decreased when we measure a third scaling relation with calibrated XCS temperatures.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2021; v1 submitted 24 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Velocity Dispersions of Clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Y3 redMaPPer Catalog
Authors:
V. Wetzell,
T. E. Jeltema,
B. Hegland,
S. Everett,
P. A. Giles,
R. Wilkinson,
A. Farahi,
M. Costanzi,
D. L. Hollowood,
E. Upsdell,
A. Saro,
J. Myles,
A. Bermeo,
S. Bhargava,
C. A. Collins,
D. Cross,
O. Eiger,
G. Gardner,
M. Hilton,
J. Jobel,
P. Kelly,
D. Laubner,
A. R. Liddle,
R. G. Mann,
V. Martinez
, et al. (74 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We measure the velocity dispersions of clusters of galaxies selected by the redMaPPer algorithm in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), allowing us to probe cluster selection and richness estimation, $λ$, in light of cluster dynamics. Our sample consists of 126 clusters with sufficient spectroscopy for individual velocity dispersion estimates. We examine the correlation…
▽ More
We measure the velocity dispersions of clusters of galaxies selected by the redMaPPer algorithm in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), allowing us to probe cluster selection and richness estimation, $λ$, in light of cluster dynamics. Our sample consists of 126 clusters with sufficient spectroscopy for individual velocity dispersion estimates. We examine the correlations between cluster velocity dispersion, richness, X-ray temperature and luminosity as well as central galaxy velocity offsets. The velocity dispersion-richness relation exhibits a bimodal distribution. The majority of clusters follow scaling relations between velocity dispersion, richness, and X-ray properties similar to those found for previous samples; however, there is a significant population of clusters with velocity dispersions which are high for their richness. These clusters account for roughly 22\% of the $λ< 70$ systems in our sample, but more than half (55\%) of $λ< 70$ clusters at $z>0.5$. A couple of these systems are hot and X-ray bright as expected for massive clusters with richnesses that appear to have been underestimated, but most appear to have high velocity dispersions for their X-ray properties likely due to line-of-sight structure. These results suggest that projection effects contribute significantly to redMaPPer selection, particularly at higher redshifts and lower richnesses. The redMaPPer determined richnesses for the velocity dispersion outliers are consistent with their X-ray properties, but several are X-ray undetected and deeper data is needed to understand their nature.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2022; v1 submitted 15 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Scaling Properties of Galaxy Groups
Authors:
Lorenzo Lovisari,
Stefano Ettori,
Massimo Gaspari,
Paul A. Giles
Abstract:
Galaxy groups and poor clusters are more common than rich clusters, and host the largest fraction of matter content in the Universe. Hence, their studies are key to understand the gravitational and thermal evolution of the bulk of the cosmic matter. Moreover, because of their shallower gravitational potential, galaxy groups are systems where non-gravitational processes (e.g., cooling, AGN feedback…
▽ More
Galaxy groups and poor clusters are more common than rich clusters, and host the largest fraction of matter content in the Universe. Hence, their studies are key to understand the gravitational and thermal evolution of the bulk of the cosmic matter. Moreover, because of their shallower gravitational potential, galaxy groups are systems where non-gravitational processes (e.g., cooling, AGN feedback, star formation) are expected to have a higher impact on the distribution of baryons, and on the general physical properties, than in more massive objects, inducing systematic departures from the expected scaling relations. Despite their paramount importance from the astrophysical and cosmological point of view, the challenges in their detection have limited the studies of galaxy groups. Upcoming large surveys will change this picture, reassigning to galaxy groups their central role in studying the structure formation and evolution in the Universe, and in measuring the cosmic baryonic content. Here, we review the recent literature on various scaling relations between X-ray and optical properties of these systems, focusing on the observational measurements, and the progress in our understanding of the deviations from the self-similar expectations on groups' scales. We discuss some of the sources of these deviations, and how feedback from supernovae and/or AGNs impacts the general properties and the reconstructed scaling laws. Finally, we discuss future prospects in the study of galaxy groups.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
The Growth of Intracluster Light in XCS-HSC Galaxy Clusters from $0.1 < z < 0.5$
Authors:
Kate E. Furnell,
Chris A. Collins,
Lee S. Kelvin,
Ivan K. Baldry,
Phil A. James,
Maria Manolopoulou,
Robert G. Mann,
Paul A. Giles,
Alberto Bermeo,
Matthew Hilton,
Reese Wilkinson,
A. Kathy Romer,
Carlos Vergara,
Sunayana Bhargava,
John P. Stott,
Julian Mayers,
Pedro Viana
Abstract:
We estimate the Intracluster Light (ICL) component within a sample of 18 clusters detected in XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) data using deep ($\sim$ 26.8 mag) Hyper Suprime Cam Subaru Strategic Program DR1 (HSC-SSP DR1) $i$-band data. We apply a rest-frame $μ_{B} = 25 \ \mathrm{mag/arcsec^{2}}$ isophotal threshold to our clusters, below which we define light as the ICL within an aperture of $R_{X,500}$…
▽ More
We estimate the Intracluster Light (ICL) component within a sample of 18 clusters detected in XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) data using deep ($\sim$ 26.8 mag) Hyper Suprime Cam Subaru Strategic Program DR1 (HSC-SSP DR1) $i$-band data. We apply a rest-frame $μ_{B} = 25 \ \mathrm{mag/arcsec^{2}}$ isophotal threshold to our clusters, below which we define light as the ICL within an aperture of $R_{X,500}$ (X-ray estimate of $R_{500}$) centered on the Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG). After applying careful masking and corrections for flux losses from background subtraction, we recover $\sim$20% of the ICL flux, approximately four times our estimate of the typical background at the same isophotal level ($\sim$ 5%). We find that the ICL makes up about $\sim$ 24% of the total cluster stellar mass on average ($\sim$ 41% including the flux contained in the BCG within 50 kpc); this value is well-matched with other observational studies and semi-analytic/numerical simulations, but is significantly smaller than results from recent hydrodynamical simulations (even when measured in an observationally consistent way). We find no evidence for any links between the amount of ICL flux with cluster mass, but find a growth rate of $2-4$ for the ICL between $0.1 < z < 0.5$. We conclude that the ICL is the dominant evolutionary component of stellar mass in clusters from $z \sim 1$. Our work highlights the need for a consistent approach when measuring ICL alongside the need for deeper imaging, in order to unambiguously measure the ICL across as broad a redshift range as possible (e.g. 10-year stacked imaging from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory).
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2021; v1 submitted 5 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey: new evidence for the 3.5 keV feature in clusters is inconsistent with a dark matter origin
Authors:
S. Bhargava,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
T. Jeltema,
J. Mayers,
A. Bermeo,
M. Hilton,
R. Wilkinson,
C. Vergara,
C. A. Collins,
M. Manolopoulou,
P. J. Rooney,
S. Rosborough,
K. Sabirli,
J. P. Stott,
E. Swann,
P. T. P. Viana
Abstract:
There have been several reports of a detection of an unexplained excess of X-ray emission at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV in astrophysical systems. One interpretation of this excess is the decay of sterile neutrino dark matter. The most influential study to date analysed 73 clusters observed by the XMM-Newton satellite. We explore evidence for a $\simeq$ 3.5 keV excess in the XMM-PN spectra of 117 redMaPPer g…
▽ More
There have been several reports of a detection of an unexplained excess of X-ray emission at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV in astrophysical systems. One interpretation of this excess is the decay of sterile neutrino dark matter. The most influential study to date analysed 73 clusters observed by the XMM-Newton satellite. We explore evidence for a $\simeq$ 3.5 keV excess in the XMM-PN spectra of 117 redMaPPer galaxy clusters ($0.1 < z < 0.6$). In our analysis of individual spectra, we identify three systems with an excess of flux at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV. In one case (XCS J0003.3+0204) this excess may result from a discrete emission line. None of these systems are the most dark matter dominated in our sample. We group the remaining 114 clusters into four temperature ($T_{\rm X}$) bins to search for an increase in $\simeq$ 3.5 keV flux excess with $T_{\rm X}$ - a reliable tracer of halo mass. However, we do not find evidence of a significant excess in flux at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV in any $T_{\rm X}$ bins. To maximise sensitivity to a potentially weak dark matter decay feature at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV, we jointly fit 114 clusters. Again, no significant excess is found at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV. We estimate the upper limit of an undetected emission line at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV to be $2.41 \times 10^{-6}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, corresponding to a mixing angle of $\sin^2(2θ)=4.4 \times 10^{-11}$, lower than previous estimates from cluster studies. We conclude that a flux excess at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV is not a ubiquitous feature in clusters and therefore unlikely to originate from sterile neutrino dark matter decay.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2020; v1 submitted 24 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
The XXL Survey XXV. Cosmological analysis of the C1 cluster number counts
Authors:
F. Pacaud,
M. Pierre,
J. -B. Melin,
C. Adami,
A. E. Evrard,
S. Galli,
F. Gastaldello,
B. J. Maughan,
M. Sereno,
S. Alis,
B. Altieri,
M. Birkinshaw,
L. Chiappetti,
L. Faccioli,
P. A. Giles,
C. Horellou,
A. Iovino,
E. Koulouridis,
J. -P. Le Fèvre,
C. Lidman,
M. Lieu,
S. Maurogordato,
L. Moscardini,
B. M. Poggianti,
E. Pompei
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Context. We present an estimation of cosmological parameters with clusters of galaxies. Aims. We constrain the $Ω_m$, $σ_8$, and $w$ parameters from a stand-alone sample of X-ray clusters detected in the 50 deg$^2$ XMM-XXL survey with a well-defined selection function. Methods. We analyse the redshift distribution of a sample comprising 178 high S/N clusters out to a redshift of unity. The cluster…
▽ More
Context. We present an estimation of cosmological parameters with clusters of galaxies. Aims. We constrain the $Ω_m$, $σ_8$, and $w$ parameters from a stand-alone sample of X-ray clusters detected in the 50 deg$^2$ XMM-XXL survey with a well-defined selection function. Methods. We analyse the redshift distribution of a sample comprising 178 high S/N clusters out to a redshift of unity. The cluster sample scaling relations are determined in a self-consistent manner. Results. In a lambda cold dark matter ($Λ$CDM) model, the cosmology favoured by the XXL clusters compares well with results derived from the Planck S-Z clusters for a totally different sample (mass/redshift range, selection biases, and scaling relations). However, with this preliminary sample and current mass calibration uncertainty, we find no inconsistency with the Planck CMB cosmology. If we relax the $w$ parameter, the Planck CMB uncertainties increase by a factor of $\sim$10 and become comparable with those from XXL clusters. Combining the two probes allows us to put constraints on $Ω_m$=0.316$\pm$0.060, $σ_8$=0.814$\pm$0.054, and $w$=-1.02$\pm$0.20. Conclusions. This first self-consistent cosmological analysis of a sample of serendipitous XMM clusters already provides interesting insights into the constraining power of the XXL survey. Subsequent analysis will use a larger sample extending to lower confidence detections and include additional observable information, potentially improving posterior uncertainties by roughly a factor of 3.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
The XXL Survey: XXIII. The Mass Scale of XXL Clusters from Ensemble Spectroscopy
Authors:
A. Farahi,
V. Guglielmo,
A. E. Evrard,
B. M. Poggianti,
C. Adami,
S. Ettori,
F. Gastaldello,
P. A. Giles,
B. J. Maughan,
D. Rapetti,
M. Sereno,
B. Altieri,
I. Baldry,
M. Birkinshaw,
M. Bolzonella,
A. Bongiorno,
M. Brown,
L. Chiappetti,
S. P. Driver,
A. Elyiv,
B. Garilli,
L. Guennou,
A. Hopkins,
A. Iovino,
E. Koulouridis
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
An X-ray survey with the XMM-Newton telescope, XMM-XXL, has identified hundreds of galaxy groups and clusters in two 25 deg$^2$ fields. Combining spectroscopic and X-ray observations in one field, we determine how the kinetic energy of galaxies scales with hot gas temperature and also, by imposing prior constraints on the relative energies of galaxies and dark matter, infer a power-law scaling of…
▽ More
An X-ray survey with the XMM-Newton telescope, XMM-XXL, has identified hundreds of galaxy groups and clusters in two 25 deg$^2$ fields. Combining spectroscopic and X-ray observations in one field, we determine how the kinetic energy of galaxies scales with hot gas temperature and also, by imposing prior constraints on the relative energies of galaxies and dark matter, infer a power-law scaling of total mass with temperature. Our goals are: i) to determine parameters of the scaling between galaxy velocity dispersion and X-ray temperature, $T_{\rm 300kpc}$, for the halos hosting XXL-selected clusters, and; ii) to infer the log-mean scaling of total halo mass with temperature, $\langle \ln M_{200} \, | \, T, z \rangle$. We apply an ensemble velocity likelihood to a sample of $> 1500$ spectroscopic redshifts within $132$ spectroscopically confirmed clusters with redshifts $z < 0.6$ to model, $\langle \ln σ_{\rm gal}\,|\,T,z\rangle$, where $σ_{\rm gal}$ is the velocity dispersion of XXL cluster member galaxies and $T$ is a 300 kpc aperture temperature. To infer total halo mass we use a precise virial relation for massive halos calibrated by N-body simulations along with a single degree of freedom summarizing galaxy velocity bias with respect to dark matter. For the XXL-N cluster sample, we find $σ_{\rm gal} \propto T^{0.63\pm0.05}$, a slope significantly steeper than the self-similar expectation of $0.5$. Assuming scale-independent galaxy velocity bias, we infer a mean logarithmic mass at a given X-ray temperature and redshift, $\langle\ln (E(z) M_{200}/10^{14}\,{\rm M}_{\odot})|T,z\rangle=π+α\ln(T/T_p )+β\ln (E(z)/E(z_p) )$ using pivot values ${\rm k}T_{p}=2.2\,{\rm keV}$ and $z_p=0.25$, with normalization $π=0.45\pm0.24$ and slope $α=1.89\pm0.15$. We obtain only weak constraints on redshift evolution, $β=-1.29\pm1.14$.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
The X-ray luminosity-temperature relation of a complete sample of low-mass galaxy clusters
Authors:
Siwei Zou,
B. J. Maughan,
P. A. Giles,
A. Vikhlinin,
F. Pacaud,
R. Burenin,
A. Hornstrup
Abstract:
We present \Chandra\ observations of 23 galaxy groups and low-mass galaxy clusters at $0.03<z<0.15$ with a median temperature of ~2keV. The sample is a statistically complete flux-limited subset of the 400 deg$^2$ survey. We investigated the scaling relation between X-ray luminosity ($L$) and temperature ($T$), taking selection biases fully into account. The logarithmic slope of the bolometric \LT…
▽ More
We present \Chandra\ observations of 23 galaxy groups and low-mass galaxy clusters at $0.03<z<0.15$ with a median temperature of ~2keV. The sample is a statistically complete flux-limited subset of the 400 deg$^2$ survey. We investigated the scaling relation between X-ray luminosity ($L$) and temperature ($T$), taking selection biases fully into account. The logarithmic slope of the bolometric \LT\ relation was found to be $3.29\pm0.33$, consistent with values typically found for samples of more massive clusters. In combination with other recent studies of the \LT\ relation we show that there is no evidence for the slope, normalisation, or scatter of the \LT\ relation of galaxy groups being different than that of massive clusters. The exception to this is that in the special case of the most relaxed systems, the slope of the core-excised \LT\ relation appears to steepen from the self-similar value found for massive clusters to a steeper slope for the lower mass sample studied here. Thanks to our rigorous treatment of selection biases, these measurements provide a robust reference against which to compare predictions of models of the impact of feedback on the X-ray properties of galaxy groups.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
The XXL Survey. II. The bright cluster sample: catalogue and luminosity function
Authors:
F. Pacaud,
N. Clerc,
P. A. Giles,
C. Adami,
T. Sadibekova,
M. Pierre,
B. J. Maughan,
M. Lieu,
J. -P. Le Fèvre,
S. Alis,
B. Altieri,
F. Ardila,
I. Baldry,
C. Benoist,
M. Birkinshaw,
L. Chiappetti,
J. Démoclès,
D. Eckert,
A. E. Evrard,
L. Faccioli,
F. Gastaldello,
L. Guennou,
C. Horellou,
A. Iovino,
E. Koulouridis
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Context. The XXL Survey is the largest survey carried out by the XMM-Newton satellite and covers a total area of 50 square degrees distributed over two fields. It primarily aims at investigating the large-scale structures of the Universe using the distribution of galaxy clusters and active galactic nuclei as tracers of the matter distribution.
Aims. This article presents the XXL bright cluster s…
▽ More
Context. The XXL Survey is the largest survey carried out by the XMM-Newton satellite and covers a total area of 50 square degrees distributed over two fields. It primarily aims at investigating the large-scale structures of the Universe using the distribution of galaxy clusters and active galactic nuclei as tracers of the matter distribution.
Aims. This article presents the XXL bright cluster sample, a subsample of 100 galaxy clusters selected from the full XXL catalogue by setting a lower limit of $3\times 10^{-14}\,\mathrm{erg \,s^{-1}cm^{-2}}$ on the source flux within a 1$^{\prime}$ aperture.
Methods. The selection function was estimated using a mixture of Monte Carlo simulations and analytical recipes that closely reproduce the source selection process. An extensive spectroscopic follow-up provided redshifts for 97 of the 100 clusters. We derived accurate X-ray parameters for all the sources. Scaling relations were self-consistently derived from the same sample in other publications of the series. On this basis, we study the number density, luminosity function, and spatial distribution of the sample.
Results. The bright cluster sample consists of systems with masses between $M_{500}=7\times 10^{13}$ and $3\times 10^{14} M_\odot$, mostly located between $z=0.1$ and 0.5. The observed sky density of clusters is slightly below the predictions from the WMAP9 model, and significantly below the predictions from the Planck 2015 cosmology. In general, within the current uncertainties of the cluster mass calibration, models with higher values of $σ_8$ and/or $Ω_m$ appear more difficult to accommodate. We provide tight constraints on the cluster differential luminosity function and find no hint of evolution out to $z\sim1$. We also find strong evidence for the presence of large-scale structures in the XXL bright cluster sample and identify five new superclusters.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
The XXL Survey IV. Mass-temperature relation of the bright cluster sample
Authors:
Maggie Lieu,
Graham P. Smith,
Paul A. Giles,
Felicia Ziparo,
Ben J. Maughan,
Jessica Démoclès,
Florian Pacaud,
Marguerite Pierre,
Christophe Adami,
Yannick M. Bahé,
Nicolas Clerc,
Lucio Chiappetti,
Dominique Eckert,
Stefano Ettori,
Sébastien Lavoie,
Jean-Paul Le Fevre,
Ian G. McCarthy,
Martin Kilbinger,
Trevor J. Ponman,
Tatyana Sadibekova,
Jon P. Willis
Abstract:
The XXL survey is the largest survey carried out by XMM-Newton. Covering an area of 50deg$^2$, the survey contains $\sim450$ galaxy clusters out to a redshift $\sim$2 and to an X-ray flux limit of $\sim5\times10^{-15}erg\,s^{-1}cm^{-2}$. This paper is part of the first release of XXL results focussed on the bright cluster sample. We investigate the scaling relation between weak-lensing mass and X-…
▽ More
The XXL survey is the largest survey carried out by XMM-Newton. Covering an area of 50deg$^2$, the survey contains $\sim450$ galaxy clusters out to a redshift $\sim$2 and to an X-ray flux limit of $\sim5\times10^{-15}erg\,s^{-1}cm^{-2}$. This paper is part of the first release of XXL results focussed on the bright cluster sample. We investigate the scaling relation between weak-lensing mass and X-ray temperature for the brightest clusters in XXL. The scaling relation is used to estimate the mass of all 100 clusters in XXL-100-GC. Based on a subsample of 38 objects that lie within the intersection of the northern XXL field and the publicly available CFHTLenS catalog, we derive the $M_{WL}$ of each system with careful considerations of the systematics. The clusters lie at $0.1<z<0.6$ and span a range of $ T\simeq1-5keV$. We combine our sample with 58 clusters from the literature, increasing the range out to 10keV. To date, this is the largest sample of clusters with $M_{WL}$ measurements that has been used to study the mass-temperature relation. The fit ($M\propto T^b$) to the XXL clusters returns a slope $b=1.78^{+0.37}_{-0.32}$ and intrinsic scatter $σ_{\ln M|T}\simeq0.53$; the scatter is dominated by disturbed clusters. The fit to the combined sample of 96 clusters is in tension with self-similarity, $b=1.67\pm0.12$ and $σ_{\ln M|T}\simeq0.41$. Overall our results demonstrate the feasibility of ground-based weak-lensing scaling relation studies down to cool systems of $\sim1keV$ temperature and highlight that the current data and samples are a limit to our statistical precision. As such we are unable to determine whether the validity of hydrostatic equilibrium is a function of halo mass. An enlarged sample of cool systems, deeper weak-lensing data, and robust modelling of the selection function will help to explore these issues further.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
The XXL Survey III. Luminosity-temperature relation of the Bright Cluster Sample
Authors:
P. A. Giles,
B. J. Maughan,
F. Pacaud,
M. Lieu,
N. Clerc,
M. Pierre,
C. Adami,
L. Chiappetti,
J. Démoclés,
S. Ettori,
J. P. Le Févre,
T. Ponman,
T. Sadibekova,
G. P. Smith,
J. P. Willis,
F. Ziparo
Abstract:
The XXL Survey is the largest homogeneous survey carried out with XMM-Newton. Covering an area of 50 deg$^{2}$, the survey contains several hundred galaxy clusters out to a redshift of $\approx$2 above an X-ray flux limit of $\sim$5$\times10^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. This paper belongs to the first series of XXL papers focusing on the bright cluster sample. We investigate the luminosity-tempe…
▽ More
The XXL Survey is the largest homogeneous survey carried out with XMM-Newton. Covering an area of 50 deg$^{2}$, the survey contains several hundred galaxy clusters out to a redshift of $\approx$2 above an X-ray flux limit of $\sim$5$\times10^{-15}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. This paper belongs to the first series of XXL papers focusing on the bright cluster sample. We investigate the luminosity-temperature (LT) relation for the brightest clusters detected in the XXL Survey, taking fully into account the selection biases. We investigate the form of the LT relation, placing constraints on its evolution. We have classified the 100 brightest clusters in the XXL Survey based on their measured X-ray flux. These 100 clusters have been analysed to determine their luminosity and temperature to evaluate the LT relation. We used three methods to fit the LT relation, with two of these methods providing a prescription to fully take into account the selection effects of the survey. We measure the evolution of the LT relation internally using the broad redshift range of the sample. Taking into account selection effects, we find a slope of the bolometric LT relation of B$_{\rm LT}=3.08\pm$0.15, steeper than the self-similar expectation (B$_{\rm LT}$=2). Our best-fit result for the evolution factor is $E(z)^{1.64\pm0.77}$, consistent with "strong self-similar" evolution where clusters scale self-similarly with both mass and redshift. However, this result is marginally stronger than "weak self-similar" evolution, where clusters scale with redshift alone. We investigate the sensitivity of our results to the assumptions made in our model, finding that using an external LT relation as a low-z baseline can have a profound effect on the measured evolution. However, more clusters are needed to break the degeneracy between the choice of likelihood model and mass-temperature relation on the derived evolution.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
Hydrostatic and Caustic Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters
Authors:
Ben J. Maughan,
Paul A. Giles,
Kenneth J. Rines,
Antonaldo Diaferio,
Margaret J. Geller,
Nina Van Der Pyl,
Massimiliano Bonamente
Abstract:
We compare X-ray and caustic mass profiles for a sample of 16 massive galaxy clusters. We assume hydrostatic equilibrium in interpreting the X-ray data, and use large samples of cluster members with redshifts as a basis for applying the caustic technique. The hydrostatic and caustic masses agree to better than $\approx20\%$ on average across the radial range covered by both techniques…
▽ More
We compare X-ray and caustic mass profiles for a sample of 16 massive galaxy clusters. We assume hydrostatic equilibrium in interpreting the X-ray data, and use large samples of cluster members with redshifts as a basis for applying the caustic technique. The hydrostatic and caustic masses agree to better than $\approx20\%$ on average across the radial range covered by both techniques $(\sim[0.2-1.25]R_{500})$. The mass profiles were measured independently and do not assume a common functional form. Previous studies suggest that, at $R_{500}$, the hydrostatic and caustic masses are biased low and high respectively. We find that the ratio of hydrostatic to caustic mass at $R_{500}$ is $1.20^{+0.13}_{-0.11}$; thus it is larger than 0.9 at $\approx3σ$ and the combination of under- and over-estimation of the mass by these two techniques is $\approx10\%$ at most. There is no indication of any dependence of the mass ratio on the X-ray morphology of the clusters, indicating that the hydrostatic masses are not strongly systematically affected by the dynamical state of the clusters. Overall, our results favour a small value of the so-called hydrostatic bias due to non-thermal pressure sources.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2016; v1 submitted 24 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
-
Chandra Measurements of a Complete Sample of X-ray Luminous Galaxy Clusters: The Luminosity-Mass Relation
Authors:
P. A. Giles,
B. J. Maughan,
H. Dahle,
M. Bonamente,
D. Landry,
C. Jones,
M. Joy,
S. S. Murray,
N. van der Pyl
Abstract:
We present the results of work involving a statistically complete sample of 34 galaxy clusters, in the redshift range 0.15$\le$z$\le$0.3 observed with $Chandra$. We investigate the luminosity-mass ($LM$) relation for the cluster sample, with the masses obtained via a full hydrostatic mass analysis. We utilise a method to fully account for selection biases when modeling the $LM$ relation, and find…
▽ More
We present the results of work involving a statistically complete sample of 34 galaxy clusters, in the redshift range 0.15$\le$z$\le$0.3 observed with $Chandra$. We investigate the luminosity-mass ($LM$) relation for the cluster sample, with the masses obtained via a full hydrostatic mass analysis. We utilise a method to fully account for selection biases when modeling the $LM$ relation, and find that the $LM$ relation is significantly different than the relation modelled when not account for selection effects. We find that the luminosity of our clusters is 2.2$\pm$0.4 times higher (when accounting for selection effects) than the average for a given mass, its mass is 30% lower than the population average for a given luminosity. Equivalently, using the $LM$ relation measured from this sample without correcting for selection biases would lead to the underestimation by 40% of the average mass of a cluster with a given luminosity. Comparing the hydrostatic masses to mass estimates determined from the $Y_{X}$ parameter, we find that they are entirely consistent, irrespective of the dynamical state of the cluster.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2016; v1 submitted 14 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
The X-ray Properties of Weak Lensing Selected Galaxy Clusters
Authors:
P. A. Giles,
B. J. Maughan,
T. Hamana,
S. Miyazaki,
M. Birkinshaw,
R. S. Ellis,
R. Massey
Abstract:
We present the results of an X-ray follow-up campaign targeting 10 Weak Lensing (WL) selected galaxy clusters from a Subaru WL survey. Eight clusters were studied with dedicated Chandra pointings, whereas archival X-ray data were used for the remaining two clusters. The WL clusters appear to fit the same scaling relation between X-ray luminosity and temperature as X-ray selected clusters. However,…
▽ More
We present the results of an X-ray follow-up campaign targeting 10 Weak Lensing (WL) selected galaxy clusters from a Subaru WL survey. Eight clusters were studied with dedicated Chandra pointings, whereas archival X-ray data were used for the remaining two clusters. The WL clusters appear to fit the same scaling relation between X-ray luminosity and temperature as X-ray selected clusters. However, when we consider the luminosity-mass relation, the WL selected clusters appear underluminous by a factor 3.9$\pm$0.9 (or, alternatively, more massive by 2.9$\pm$0.2), compared to X-ray selected clusters. Only by considering various observational effects that could potentially bias WL masses, can this difference be reconciled. We used X-ray imaging data to quantify the dynamical state of the clusters and found that one of the clusters appears dynamically relaxed, and two of the clusters host a cool core, consistent with Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect selected clusters. Our results suggest that regular, cool core clusters may be over-represented in X-ray selected samples.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2014;
originally announced February 2014.
-
Separating the BL Lac and Cluster X-ray Emissions in Abell 689 with Chandra
Authors:
P. A. Giles,
B. J. Maughan,
M. Birkinshaw,
D. M. Worrall,
K. Lancaster
Abstract:
We present the results of a Chandra observation of the galaxy cluster Abell 689 (z=0.279). Abell 689 is one of the most luminous clusters detected in the ROSAT All Sky Survey (RASS), but was flagged as possibly including significant point source contamination. The small PSF of the Chandra telescope allows us to confirm this and separate the point source from the extended cluster X-ray emission. Fo…
▽ More
We present the results of a Chandra observation of the galaxy cluster Abell 689 (z=0.279). Abell 689 is one of the most luminous clusters detected in the ROSAT All Sky Survey (RASS), but was flagged as possibly including significant point source contamination. The small PSF of the Chandra telescope allows us to confirm this and separate the point source from the extended cluster X-ray emission. For the cluster we determine a bolometric luminosity of L_{bol}=(3.3+/-0.3)x10^{44} erg s-1 and a temperature of kT=5.1^{+2.2}_{-1.3} keV when including a physically motivated background model. We compare our measured luminosity for A689 to that quoted in the Rosat All Sky Survey (RASS) and find L_{0.1-2.4,keV}=2.8x10^{44} erg s-1, a value \sim10 times lower than the ROSAT measurement. Our analysis of the point source shows evidence for significant pileup, with a pile-up fraction of ~60%. SDSS spectra and HST images lead us to the conclusion that the point source within Abell 689 is a BL Lac object. Using radio and optical observations from the VLA and HST archives, we determine α_{ro}=0.50, α_{ox}=0.77 and α_{rx}=0.58 for the BL Lac, which would classify it as being of 'High-energy peak BL Lac' (HBL) type. Spectra extracted of A689 show a hard X-ray excess at energies above 6 keV that we interpret as inverse Compton emission from aged electrons that may have been transported into the cluster from the BL Lac.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2011;
originally announced December 2011.
-
Self-similar scaling and evolution in the galaxy cluster X-ray Luminosity-Temperature relation
Authors:
B. J. Maughan,
P. A. Giles,
S. W. Randall,
C. Jones,
W. R. Forman
Abstract:
We investigate the form and evolution of the X-ray luminosity-temperature (LT) relation of a sample of 114 galaxy clusters observed with Chandra at 0.1<z<1.3. The clusters were divided into subsamples based on their X-ray morphology or whether they host strong cool cores. We find that when the core regions are excluded, the most relaxed clusters (or those with the strongest cool cores) follow an L…
▽ More
We investigate the form and evolution of the X-ray luminosity-temperature (LT) relation of a sample of 114 galaxy clusters observed with Chandra at 0.1<z<1.3. The clusters were divided into subsamples based on their X-ray morphology or whether they host strong cool cores. We find that when the core regions are excluded, the most relaxed clusters (or those with the strongest cool cores) follow an LT relation with a slope that agrees well with simple self-similar expectations. This is supported by an analysis of the gas density profiles of the systems, which shows self-similar behaviour of the gas profiles of the relaxed clusters outside the core regions. By comparing our data with clusters in the REXCESS sample, which extends to lower masses, we find evidence that the self-similar behaviour of even the most relaxed clusters breaks at around 3.5keV. By contrast, the LT slopes of the subsamples of unrelaxed systems (or those without strong cool cores) are significantly steeper than the self-similar model, with lower mass systems appearing less luminous and higher mass systems appearing more luminous than the self-similar relation. We argue that these results are consistent with a model of non-gravitational energy input in clusters that combines central heating with entropy enhancements from merger shocks. Such enhancements could extend the impact of central energy input to larger radii in unrelaxed clusters, as suggested by our data. We also examine the evolution of the LT relation, and find that while the data appear inconsistent with simple self-similar evolution, the differences can be plausibly explained by selection bias, and thus we find no reason to rule out self-similar evolution. We show that the fraction of cool core clusters in our (non-representative) sample decreases at z>0.5 and discuss the effect of this on measurements of the evolution in the LT relation.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2011;
originally announced August 2011.
