Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Floor, S

Simulated Versus Observed Cluster Eccentricity Evolution

Authors: Stephen Floor, Adrian Melott, and Patrick Motl

Abstract: The rate of galaxy cluster eccentricity evolution is useful in understanding large scale structure. Rapid evolution for $z < $ 0.13 has been found in two different observed cluster samples. We present an analysis of projections of 41 clusters produced in hydrodynamic simulations augmented with radiative cooling and 43 clusters from adiabatic simulations. This new, larger set of simulated cluster… ▽ More The rate of galaxy cluster eccentricity evolution is useful in understanding large scale structure. Rapid evolution for $z < $ 0.13 has been found in two different observed cluster samples. We present an analysis of projections of 41 clusters produced in hydrodynamic simulations augmented with radiative cooling and 43 clusters from adiabatic simulations. This new, larger set of simulated clusters strengthens the claims of previous eccentricity studies. We find very slow evolution in simulated clusters, significantly different from the reported rates of observational eccentricity evolution. We estimate the rate of change of eccentricity with redshift and compare the rates between simulated and observed clusters. We also use a variable aperture radius to compute the eccentricity, r$_{200}$. This method is much more robust than the fixed aperture radius used in previous studies. Apparently radiative cooling does not change cluster morphology on scales large enough to alter eccentricity. The discrepancy between simulated and observed cluster eccentricity remains. Observational bias or incomplete physics in simulations must be present to produce halos that evolve so differently. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2004; v1 submitted 30 July, 2003; originally announced July 2003.

Comments: ApJ, in press, minor revisions

Journal ref: Astrophys.J.611:153-157,2004

Eccentricity Evolution in Simulated Galaxy Clusters

Authors: Stephen Floor, Adrian Melott, Christopher Miller, Greg Bryan

Abstract: Strong cluster eccentricity evolution for $z \le 0.13$ has appeared in a variety of observational data sets. We examine the evolution of eccentricity in simulated galaxy clusters using a variety of simulation methodologies, amplitude normalizations, and background cosmologies. We do not find find such evolution for $z < 0.1$ in any of our simulation ensembles. We suggest a systematic error in th… ▽ More Strong cluster eccentricity evolution for $z \le 0.13$ has appeared in a variety of observational data sets. We examine the evolution of eccentricity in simulated galaxy clusters using a variety of simulation methodologies, amplitude normalizations, and background cosmologies. We do not find find such evolution for $z < 0.1$ in any of our simulation ensembles. We suggest a systematic error in the form of a redshift-dependent selection effect in cluster catalogs or missing physics in cluster simulations important enough to modify the cluster morphology. △ Less

Submitted 21 March, 2003; v1 submitted 27 January, 2003; originally announced January 2003.

Comments: Revised version to be published in ApJ. Moderate revisions, including additional N-body simulations with varying amplitude normalization and background matter density within OCDM and $λ$CDM scenarios reinforce our conclusion that observed clusters have recently relaxed much more rapidly than simulated ones

Journal ref: Astrophys.J. 591 (2003) 741-748