-
Critical point Higgs inflation in the Palatini formulation
Authors:
Vera-Maria Enckell,
Sami Nurmi,
Syksy Rasanen,
Eemeli Tomberg
Abstract:
We study Higgs inflation in the Palatini formulation with the renormalisation group improved potential in the case when loop corrections generate a feature similar to an inflection point. Assuming that there is a threshold correction for the Higgs quartic coupling $λ$ and the top Yukawa coupling $y_t$, we scan the three-dimensional parameter space formed by the two jumps and the non-minimal coupli…
▽ More
We study Higgs inflation in the Palatini formulation with the renormalisation group improved potential in the case when loop corrections generate a feature similar to an inflection point. Assuming that there is a threshold correction for the Higgs quartic coupling $λ$ and the top Yukawa coupling $y_t$, we scan the three-dimensional parameter space formed by the two jumps and the non-minimal coupling $ξ$.
The spectral index $n_s$ can take any value in the observationally allowed range. The lower limit for the running is $α_s>-3.5\times10^{-3}$, and $α_s$ can be as large as the observational upper limit. Running of the running is small. The tensor-to-scalar ratio is $2.2\times 10^{-17}<r<2\times10^{-5}$. We find that slow-roll can be violated near the feature, and a possible period of ultra-slow-roll contributes to the widening of the range of CMB predictions. Nevertheless, for the simplest tree-level action, the Palatini formulation remains distinguishable from the metric formulation even when quantum corrections are taken into account, because of the small tensor-to-scalar ratio.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2021; v1 submitted 7 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Higgs-$R^2$ inflation -- full slow-roll study at tree-level
Authors:
Vera-Maria Enckell,
Kari Enqvist,
Syksy Rasanen,
Lumi-Pyry Wahlman
Abstract:
We consider Higgs inflation with an $αR^2$ term. It adds a new scalar degree of freedom, which leads to a two-field model of inflation. We do a complete slow-roll analysis of the three-dimensional parameter space of the $R^2$ coefficient $α$, the non-minimal coupling $ξ$ and the Higgs self-coupling $λ$. We find three classes of inflationary solutions, but only pure $R^2$ and attractor solutions fi…
▽ More
We consider Higgs inflation with an $αR^2$ term. It adds a new scalar degree of freedom, which leads to a two-field model of inflation. We do a complete slow-roll analysis of the three-dimensional parameter space of the $R^2$ coefficient $α$, the non-minimal coupling $ξ$ and the Higgs self-coupling $λ$. We find three classes of inflationary solutions, but only pure $R^2$ and attractor solutions fit observations. We find that pure Higgs inflation is impossible when the $R^2$ term is present regardless of how small $α$ is. However, we can have Higgs-like inflation, where the amplitude of the perturbations does not depend on $α$ and the predictions as a function of e-folds are the same as in Higgs inflation, although the inflationary trajectory is curved in field space. The spectral index is $0.939 < n_R < 0.967$, and constraining it to the observed range, the tensor-to-scalar ratio varies from $3.8\times10^{-3}$ to the maximum allowed by observations, $0.079$. Observational constraints on isocurvature perturbations contribute to these limits, whereas non-Gaussianity is automatically in the range allowed by observations.
△ Less
Submitted 21 January, 2020; v1 submitted 20 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Inflation with $R^2$ term in the Palatini formalism
Authors:
Vera-Maria Enckell,
Kari Enqvist,
Syksy Rasanen,
Lumi-Pyry Wahlman
Abstract:
We study scalar field inflation in $F(R)$ gravity in the Palatini formulation of general relativity. Unlike in the metric formulation, in the Palatini formulation $F(R)$ gravity does not introduce new degrees of freedom. However, it changes the relations between existing degrees of freedom, including the inflaton and spacetime curvature. Considering the case $F(R)=R+αR^2$, we find that the $R^2$ t…
▽ More
We study scalar field inflation in $F(R)$ gravity in the Palatini formulation of general relativity. Unlike in the metric formulation, in the Palatini formulation $F(R)$ gravity does not introduce new degrees of freedom. However, it changes the relations between existing degrees of freedom, including the inflaton and spacetime curvature. Considering the case $F(R)=R+αR^2$, we find that the $R^2$ term decreases the height of the effective inflaton potential. By adjusting the value of $α$, this mechanism can be used to suppress the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$ without limit in any scalar field model of inflation without affecting the spectrum of scalar perturbations.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2019; v1 submitted 11 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Higgs inflation at the hilltop
Authors:
Vera-Maria Enckell,
Kari Enqvist,
Syksy Rasanen,
Eemeli Tomberg
Abstract:
We study inflation with the non-minimally coupled Standard Model Higgs in the case when quantum corrections generate a hilltop in the potential. We consider both the metric and the Palatini formulation of general relativity. We investigate hilltop inflation in different parts of the Higgs potential and calculate predictions for CMB observables. We run the renormalization group equations up from th…
▽ More
We study inflation with the non-minimally coupled Standard Model Higgs in the case when quantum corrections generate a hilltop in the potential. We consider both the metric and the Palatini formulation of general relativity. We investigate hilltop inflation in different parts of the Higgs potential and calculate predictions for CMB observables. We run the renormalization group equations up from the electroweak scale and down from the hilltop, adding a jump in-between to account for unknown corrections in the intermediate regime. Within our approximation, no viable hilltop inflation is possible for small field values, where the non-minimal coupling has no role, nor for intermediate field values. For large field values, hilltop inflation works. We find the spectral index to be $n_s\leq0.96$ in both the metric and the Palatini formulation, the upper bound coinciding with the tree-level result. The tensor-to-scalar ratio is $r\leq1.2\times10^{-3}$ in the metric case and $r\leq2.2\times10^{-9}$ in the Palatini case. Successful inflation is possible even when the renormalization group running is continuous with no jumps. In the metric formulation, $r$ is smaller than in Higgs inflation on the tree-level plateau or at the critical point, making it possible to distinguish hilltop inflation from these scenarios with next-generation CMB experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2018; v1 submitted 26 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Observational signatures of Higgs inflation
Authors:
Vera-Maria Enckell,
Kari Enqvist,
Sami Nurmi
Abstract:
We investigate the dependency of Higgs inflation on the non-renormalisable matching between the low energy Standard Model limit and the inflationary regime at high energies. We show that for the top mass range $m_t \gtrsim 171.8$ GeV the scenario robustly predicts the spectral index $n_s \simeq 0.97$ and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r\simeq 0.003$. The matching is however non-trivial, even the best…
▽ More
We investigate the dependency of Higgs inflation on the non-renormalisable matching between the low energy Standard Model limit and the inflationary regime at high energies. We show that for the top mass range $m_t \gtrsim 171.8$ GeV the scenario robustly predicts the spectral index $n_s \simeq 0.97$ and the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r\simeq 0.003$. The matching is however non-trivial, even the best-fit values $m_h=125.09$ GeV and $m_t=173.21$ GeV require a jump $δλ\sim 0.01$ in the Higgs coupling below the inflationary scale. For $m_t\lesssim 171.8$ GeV, the matching may generate a feature in the inflationary potential. In this case the predicted values of $n_s$ and $r$ vary but the model is still falsifiable. For example, a detection of negative running of spectral index at level $α_s \lesssim -0.01$ would rule out Higgs inflation.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
