-
A Joint Fermi-GBM and Swift-BAT Analysis of Gravitational-Wave Candidates from the Third Gravitational-wave Observing Run
Authors:
C. Fletcher,
J. Wood,
R. Hamburg,
P. Veres,
C. M. Hui,
E. Bissaldi,
M. S. Briggs,
E. Burns,
W. H. Cleveland,
M. M. Giles,
A. Goldstein,
B. A. Hristov,
D. Kocevski,
S. Lesage,
B. Mailyan,
C. Malacaria,
S. Poolakkil,
A. von Kienlin,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor Team,
M. Crnogorčević,
J. DeLaunay,
A. Tohuvavohu,
R. Caputo,
S. B. Cenko
, et al. (1674 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (Fermi-GBM) and Swift Burst Alert Telescope (Swift-BAT) searches for gamma-ray/X-ray counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) candidate events identified during the third observing run of the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. Using Fermi-GBM on-board triggers and sub-threshold gamma-ray burst (GRB) candidates found in the Fermi-GBM ground analyses,…
▽ More
We present Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (Fermi-GBM) and Swift Burst Alert Telescope (Swift-BAT) searches for gamma-ray/X-ray counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) candidate events identified during the third observing run of the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. Using Fermi-GBM on-board triggers and sub-threshold gamma-ray burst (GRB) candidates found in the Fermi-GBM ground analyses, the Targeted Search and the Untargeted Search, we investigate whether there are any coincident GRBs associated with the GWs. We also search the Swift-BAT rate data around the GW times to determine whether a GRB counterpart is present. No counterparts are found. Using both the Fermi-GBM Targeted Search and the Swift-BAT search, we calculate flux upper limits and present joint upper limits on the gamma-ray luminosity of each GW. Given these limits, we constrain theoretical models for the emission of gamma-rays from binary black hole mergers.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
A Joint Fermi-GBM and LIGO/Virgo Analysis of Compact Binary Mergers From the First and Second Gravitational-wave Observing Runs
Authors:
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor Team,
the LIGO Scientific Collaboration,
the Virgo Collaboration,
:,
R. Hamburg,
C. Fletcher,
E. Burns,
A. Goldstein,
E. Bissaldi,
M. S. Briggs,
W. H. Cleveland,
M. M. Giles,
C. M. Hui,
D. Kocevski,
S. Lesage,
B. Mailyan,
C. Malacaria,
S. Poolakkil,
R. Preece,
O. J. Roberts,
P. Veres,
A. von Kienlin,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
J. Wood,
R. Abbott
, et al. (1241 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present results from offline searches of Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) data for gamma-ray transients coincident with the compact binary coalescences observed by the gravitational-wave (GW) detectors Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo during their first and second observing runs. In particular, we perform follow-up for both confirmed events and low significance candidates reported in the LIG…
▽ More
We present results from offline searches of Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) data for gamma-ray transients coincident with the compact binary coalescences observed by the gravitational-wave (GW) detectors Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo during their first and second observing runs. In particular, we perform follow-up for both confirmed events and low significance candidates reported in the LIGO/Virgo catalog GWTC-1. We search for temporal coincidences between these GW signals and GBM triggered gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We also use the GBM Untargeted and Targeted subthreshold searches to find coincident gamma-rays below the on-board triggering threshold. This work implements a refined statistical approach by incorporating GW astrophysical source probabilities and GBM visibilities of LIGO/Virgo sky localizations to search for cumulative signatures of coincident subthreshold gamma-rays. All search methods recover the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A occurring ~1.7 s after the binary neutron star merger GW170817. We also present results from a new search seeking GBM counterparts to LIGO single-interferometer triggers. This search finds a candidate joint event, but given the nature of the GBM signal and localization, as well as the high joint false alarm rate of $1.1 \times 10^{-6}$ Hz, we do not consider it an astrophysical association. We find no additional coincidences.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2020; v1 submitted 3 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Calibration of Advanced Virgo and Reconstruction of the Gravitational Wave Signal h(t) during the Observing Run O2
Authors:
Virgo Collaboration,
F. Acernese,
T. Adams,
K. Agatsuma,
L. Aiello,
A. Allocca,
M. A. Aloy,
A. Amato,
S. Antier,
M. Arène,
N. Arnaud,
S. Ascenzi,
P. Astone,
F. Aubin,
S. Babak,
P. Bacon,
F. Badaracco,
M. K. M. Bader,
F. Baldaccini,
G. Ballardin,
F. Barone,
M. Barsuglia,
D. Barta,
A. Basti,
M. Bawaj
, et al. (259 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In August 2017, Advanced Virgo joined Advanced LIGO for the end of the O2 run, leading to the first gravitational waves detections with the three-detector network. This paper describes the Advanced Virgo calibration and the gravitational wave strain h(t) reconstruction during O2. The methods are the same as the ones developed for the initial Virgo detector and have already been described in previo…
▽ More
In August 2017, Advanced Virgo joined Advanced LIGO for the end of the O2 run, leading to the first gravitational waves detections with the three-detector network. This paper describes the Advanced Virgo calibration and the gravitational wave strain h(t) reconstruction during O2. The methods are the same as the ones developed for the initial Virgo detector and have already been described in previous publications, this paper summarizes the differences and emphasis is put on estimating systematic uncertainties. Three versions of the h(t) signal have been computed for the Virgo O2 run, an online version and two post-run reprocessed versions with improved detector calibration and reconstruction algorithm. A photon calibrator has been used to establish the sign of h(t) and to make an independent partial cross-check of the systematic uncertainties. The uncertainties reached for the latest h(t) version are 5.1% in amplitude, 40 mrad in phase and 20 microseconds in timing.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2018; v1 submitted 9 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
