-
Understanding the formation of Saturn's regular moons in the context of giant planet moons formation scenarios
Authors:
Michel Blanc,
Aurélien Crida,
Yuhito Shibaike,
Sebastien Charnoz,
Maryame El Moutamid,
Paul Estrada,
Olivier Mousis,
Julien Salmon,
Antoine Schneeberger,
Pierre Vernazza
Abstract:
This article explores the different formation scenarios of the Kronian moons system in the context of a highly dissipative Saturn, with the objective of identifying the most likely of these scenarios. First, we review the diversity of objects - moons and rings - orbiting solar system giant planets, and the diversity of their architectures, which formation scenarios must reproduce. We then identify…
▽ More
This article explores the different formation scenarios of the Kronian moons system in the context of a highly dissipative Saturn, with the objective of identifying the most likely of these scenarios. First, we review the diversity of objects - moons and rings - orbiting solar system giant planets, and the diversity of their architectures, which formation scenarios must reproduce. We then identify in this broader context the specific features of the Saturn system, such as the particularly large spectrum of its moon masses, the uniqueness of Titan and the presence of both dense and tenuous rings, before discussing the applicability of the different giant planet moon formation scenarios to the Saturn case. We discuss each of the most relevant scenarios and their respective merits. Finally, we tentatively propose a "favorite" scenario and we identify the key observations to be made by future space missions and/or Earth-based telescopic observations to validate this scenario or possibly alternative ones.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Ionospheric conductances at the giant planets of the Solar System:a comparative study of ionization sources and the impact of meteoric ions
Authors:
Noé Clément,
Yuki Nakamura,
Michel Blanc,
Yuxian Wang,
Sariah Al Saati
Abstract:
The dynamics of giant planet magnetospheres is controlled by a complex interplay between their fast rotation, their interaction with the solar wind, and their diverse internal plasma and momentum sources. In the ionosphere, the Hall and Pedersen conductances are two key parameters that regulate the intensity of currents coupling the magnetosphere and the ionosphere, and the rate of angular momentu…
▽ More
The dynamics of giant planet magnetospheres is controlled by a complex interplay between their fast rotation, their interaction with the solar wind, and their diverse internal plasma and momentum sources. In the ionosphere, the Hall and Pedersen conductances are two key parameters that regulate the intensity of currents coupling the magnetosphere and the ionosphere, and the rate of angular momentum transfer and power carried by these currents. We perform a comparative study of Hall and Pedersen conductivities and conductances in the four giant planets of our Solar System - Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. We use a generic ionospheric model (restraining the studied ions to H3+, CH5+, and meteoric ions) to study the dependence of conductances on the structure and composition of these planets' upper atmospheres and on the main ionization sources (photoionization, ionization by precipitating electrons, and meteoroid ablation). After checking that our model reproduces the conclusions of Nakamura et al. (2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030312) at Jupiter, i.e. the contribution of meteoric ions to the height-integrated conductances is non-negligible, we show that this contribution could also be non-negligible at Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, compared with ionization processes caused by precipitating electrons of energies lower than a few keV (typical energies on these planets). However, because of their weaker magnetic field, the conductive layer of these planets is higher than the layer where meteoric ions are mainly produced, limiting their role in magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Revisit of discrete energy bands in Galilean moon's footprint tails: remote signals of particle absorption
Authors:
Fan Yang,
Xuzhi-Zhou,
Ying Liu,
Yi-Xin Sun,
Ze-Fan Yin,
Yi-Xin Hao,
Zhi-Yang Liu,
Michel Blanc,
Jiu-Tong Zhao,
Dong-Wen He,
Ya-Ze Wu,
Shan Wang,
Chao Yue,
Qiu-Gang Zong
Abstract:
Recent observations from the Juno spacecraft during its transit over flux tubes of the Galilean moons have identified sharp enhancements of particle fluxes at discrete energies. These banded structures have been suspected to originate from a bounce resonance between particles and standing Alfven waves generated by the moon-magnetospheric interaction. Here, we show that predictions from the above h…
▽ More
Recent observations from the Juno spacecraft during its transit over flux tubes of the Galilean moons have identified sharp enhancements of particle fluxes at discrete energies. These banded structures have been suspected to originate from a bounce resonance between particles and standing Alfven waves generated by the moon-magnetospheric interaction. Here, we show that predictions from the above hypothesis are inconsistent with the observations, and propose an alternative interpretation that the banded structures are remote signals of particle absorption at the moons. In this scenario, whether a particle would encounter the moon before reaching Juno depends on the number of bounce cycles it experiences within a fixed section of drift motion determined by moon-spacecraft longitudinal separation. Therefore, the absorption bands are expected to appear at discrete, equally-spaced velocities consistent with the observations. This finding improves our understanding of moon-plasma interactions and provides a potential way to evaluate the Jovian magnetospheric models.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Properties of electrons accelerated by the Ganymede-magnetosphere interaction: survey of Juno high-latitude observations
Authors:
J. Rabia,
V. Hue,
N. Andre,
Q. Nenon,
J. R. Szalay,
F. Allegrini,
A. H. Sulaiman,
C. K. Louis,
T. K. Greathouse,
Y. Sarkango,
D. Santos-Costa,
M. Blanc,
E. Penou,
P. Louarn,
R. W. Ebert,
G. R. Gladstone,
A. Mura,
J. E. P. Connerney,
S. J. Bolton
Abstract:
The encounter between the Jovian co-rotating plasma and Ganymede gives rise to electromagnetic waves that propagate along the magnetic field lines and accelerate particles by resonant or non-resonant wave-particle interaction. They ultimately precipitate into Jupiter's atmosphere and trigger auroral emissions. In this study, we use Juno/JADE, Juno/UVS data, and magnetic field line tracing to chara…
▽ More
The encounter between the Jovian co-rotating plasma and Ganymede gives rise to electromagnetic waves that propagate along the magnetic field lines and accelerate particles by resonant or non-resonant wave-particle interaction. They ultimately precipitate into Jupiter's atmosphere and trigger auroral emissions. In this study, we use Juno/JADE, Juno/UVS data, and magnetic field line tracing to characterize the properties of electrons accelerated by the Ganymede-magnetosphere interaction in the far-field region. We show that the precipitating energy flux exhibits an exponential decay as a function of downtail distance from the moon, with an e-folding value of 29°, consistent with previous UV observations from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We characterize the electron energy distributions and show that two distributions exist. Electrons creating the Main Alfvén Wing (MAW) spot and the auroral tail always have broadband distribution and a mean characteristic energy of 2.2 keV while in the region connected to the Transhemispheric Electron Beam (TEB) spot the electrons are distributed non-monotonically, with a higher characteristic energy above 10 keV. Based on the observation of bidirectional electron beams, we suggest that Juno was located within the acceleration region during the 11 observations reported. We thus estimate that the acceleration region is extended, at least, between an altitude of 0.5 and 1.3 Jupiter radius above the 1-bar surface. Finally, we estimate the size of the interaction region in the Ganymede orbital plane using far-field measurements. These observations provide important insights for the study of particle acceleration processes involved in moon-magnetosphere interactions.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Influence of the Jovian current sheet models on the mapping of the UV auroral footprints of Io, Europa, and Ganymede
Authors:
Jonas Rabia,
Quentin Nénon,
Nicolas André,
Vincent Hue,
Daniel Santos-Costa,
Aneesah Kamran,
Michel Blanc
Abstract:
The in-situ characterization of moon-magnetosphere interactions at Jupiter and the mapping of moon auroral footpaths require accurate global models of the magnetospheric magnetic field. In this study, we compare the ability of two widely-used current sheet models, Khurana-2005 (KK2005) and Connerney-2020 (CON2020) combined with the most recent measurements acquired at low, medium, and high latitud…
▽ More
The in-situ characterization of moon-magnetosphere interactions at Jupiter and the mapping of moon auroral footpaths require accurate global models of the magnetospheric magnetic field. In this study, we compare the ability of two widely-used current sheet models, Khurana-2005 (KK2005) and Connerney-2020 (CON2020) combined with the most recent measurements acquired at low, medium, and high latitudes. With the adjustments of the KK2005 model to JRM33, we show that in the outer and middle magnetosphere (R>15RJ), JRM33+KK2005 is found to be the best model to reproduce the magnetic field observations of Galileo and Juno as it accounts for local time effects. JRM33+CON2020 gives the most accurate representation of the inner magnetosphere. This finding is drawn from comparisons with Juno in-situ magnetic field measurements and confirmed by contrasting the timing of the crossings of the Io, Europa, and Ganymede flux tubes identified in the Juno particles data with the two model estimates. JRM33+CON2020 also maps more accurately the UV auroral footpath of Io, Europa, and Ganymede observed by Juno than JRM33+KK2005. The JRM33+KK2005 model predicts a local time asymmetry in position of the moons' footprints, which is however not detected in Juno's UV measurements.This could indicate that local time effects on the magnetic field are marginal at the orbital locations of Io, Europa, and Ganymede. Finally, the accuracy of the models and their predictions as a function of hemisphere, local time, and longitude is explored.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Synergies between interstellar dust and heliospheric science with an Interstellar Probe
Authors:
Veerle J. Sterken,
Silvan Hunziker,
Kostas Dialynas,
Jan Leitner,
Maximilian Sommer,
Ralf Srama,
Lennart R. Baalmann,
Aigen Li,
Konstantin Herbst,
André Galli,
Pontus Brandt,
My Riebe,
Jack Baggaley,
Michel Blanc,
Andrej Czechowski,
Frederic Effenberger,
Brian Fields,
Priscilla Frisch,
Mihaly Horanyi,
Hsiang-Wen Hsu,
Nozair Khawaja,
Harald Krüger,
Bill S. Kurth,
Niels F. W. Ligterink,
Jeffrey L. Linsky
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We discuss the synergies between heliospheric and dust science, the open science questions, the technological endeavors and programmatic aspects that are important to maintain or develop in the decade to come. In particular, we illustrate how we can use interstellar dust in the solar system as a tracer for the (dynamic) heliosphere properties, and emphasize the fairly unexplored, but potentially i…
▽ More
We discuss the synergies between heliospheric and dust science, the open science questions, the technological endeavors and programmatic aspects that are important to maintain or develop in the decade to come. In particular, we illustrate how we can use interstellar dust in the solar system as a tracer for the (dynamic) heliosphere properties, and emphasize the fairly unexplored, but potentially important science question of the role of cosmic dust in heliospheric and astrospheric physics. We show that an Interstellar Probe mission with a dedicated dust suite would bring unprecedented advances to interstellar dust research, and can also contribute-through measuring dust - to heliospheric science. This can, in particular, be done well if we work in synergy with other missions inside the solar system, thereby using multiple vantage points in space to measure the dust as it `rolls' into the heliosphere. Such synergies between missions inside the solar system and far out are crucial for disentangling the spatially and temporally varying dust flow. Finally, we highlight the relevant instrumentation and its suitability for contributing to finding answers to the research questions.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Source of radio emissions induced by the Galilean moons Io, Europa and Ganymede: in situ measurements by Juno
Authors:
C. K. Louis,
P. Louarn,
B. Collet,
N. Clément,
S. Al Saati,
J. R. Szalay,
V. Hue,
L. Lamy,
S. Kotsiaros,
W. S. Kurth,
C. M. Jackman,
Y. Wang,
M. Blanc,
F. Allegrini,
J. E. P. Connerney,
D. Gershman
Abstract:
At Jupiter, part of the auroral radio emissions are induced by the Galilean moons Io, Europa and Ganymede. Until now, except for Ganymede, they have been only remotely detected, using ground-based radio-telescopes or electric antennas aboard spacecraft. The polar trajectory of the Juno orbiter allows the spacecraft to cross the range of magnetic flux tubes which sustain the various Jupiter-satelli…
▽ More
At Jupiter, part of the auroral radio emissions are induced by the Galilean moons Io, Europa and Ganymede. Until now, except for Ganymede, they have been only remotely detected, using ground-based radio-telescopes or electric antennas aboard spacecraft. The polar trajectory of the Juno orbiter allows the spacecraft to cross the range of magnetic flux tubes which sustain the various Jupiter-satellite interactions, and in turn to sample in situ the associated radio emission regions. In this study, we focus on the detection and the characterization of radio sources associated with Io, Europa and Ganymede. Using electric wave measurements or radio observations (Juno/Waves), in situ electron measurements (Juno/JADE-E), and magnetic field measurements (Juno/MAG) we demonstrate that the Cyclotron Maser Instability (CMI) driven by a loss-cone electron distribution function is responsible for the encountered radio sources. We confirmed that radio emissions are associated with Main (MAW) or Reflected Alfvén Wing (RAW), but also show that for Europa and Ganymede, induced radio emissions are associated with Transhemispheric Electron Beam (TEB). For each traversed radio source, we determine the latitudinal extension, the CMI-resonant electron energy, and the bandwidth of the emission. We show that the presence of Alfvén perturbations and downward field aligned currents are necessary for the radio emissions to be amplified.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report Chapter 5: Enabling technologies for planetary exploration
Authors:
Manuel Grande,
Linli Guo,
Michel Blanc,
Advenit Makaya,
Sami Asmar,
David Atkinson,
Anne Bourdon,
Pascal Chabert,
Steve Chien,
John Day,
Alberto G. Fairen,
Anthony Freeman,
Antonio Genova,
Alain Herique,
Wlodek Kofman,
Joseph Lazio,
Olivier Mousis,
Gian Gabriele Ori,
Victor Parro,
Robert Preston,
Jose A Rodriguez-Manfredi,
Veerle Sterken,
Keith Stephenson,
Joshua Vander Hook,
Hunter Waite
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The main objective of this chapter is to present an overview of the different areas of key technologies that will be needed to fly the technically most challenging of the representative missions identified in chapter 4 (the Pillar 2 Horizon 2061 report). It starts with a description of the future scientific instruments which will address the key questions of Horizon 2061 described in chapter 3 (th…
▽ More
The main objective of this chapter is to present an overview of the different areas of key technologies that will be needed to fly the technically most challenging of the representative missions identified in chapter 4 (the Pillar 2 Horizon 2061 report). It starts with a description of the future scientific instruments which will address the key questions of Horizon 2061 described in chapter 3 (the Pillar 1 Horizon 2061 report) and the new technologies that the next generations of space instruments will require (section 2). From there, the chapter follows the line of logical development and implementation of a planetary mission: section 3 describes some of the novel mission architectures that will be needed and how they will articulate interplanetary spacecraft and science platforms; section 4 summarizes the system-level technologies needed: power, propulsion, navigation, communication, advanced autonomy on board planetary spacecraft; section 5 describes the diversity of specialized science platforms that will be needed to survive, operate and return scientific data from the extreme environments that future missions will target; section 6 describes the new technology developments that will be needed for long-duration missions and semi-permanent settlements; finally, section 7 attempts to anticipate on the disruptive technologies that should emerge and progressively prevail in the decades to come to meet the long-term needs of future planetary missions.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report, Chapter 4: From planetary exploration goals to technology requirements
Authors:
Jérémie Lasue,
Pierre Bousquet,
Michel Blanc,
Nicolas André,
Pierre Beck,
Gilles Berger,
Scott Bolton,
Emma Bunce,
Baptiste Chide,
Bernard Foing,
Heidi Hammel,
Emmanuel Lellouch,
Lea Griton,
Ralph Mcnutt,
Sylvestre Maurice,
Olivier Mousis,
Merav Opher,
Christophe Sotin,
Dave Senske,
Linda Spilker,
Pierre Vernazza,
Qiugang Zong
Abstract:
This chapter reviews for each province and destination of the Solar System the representative space missions that will have to be designed and implemented by 2061 to address the six key science questions about the diversity, origins, workings and habitability of planetary systems (described in chapter 1) and to perform the critical observations that have been described in chapters 3 and partly 2.…
▽ More
This chapter reviews for each province and destination of the Solar System the representative space missions that will have to be designed and implemented by 2061 to address the six key science questions about the diversity, origins, workings and habitability of planetary systems (described in chapter 1) and to perform the critical observations that have been described in chapters 3 and partly 2. It derives from this set of future representative missions, some of which will have to be flown during the 2041-2061 period, the critical technologies and supporting infrastructures that will be needed to fly these challenging missions, thus laying the foundation for the description of technologies and infrastructures for the future of planetary exploration that is given in chapters 5 and 6, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report, Chapter 3: From science questions to Solar System exploration
Authors:
Véronique Dehant,
Michel Blanc,
Steve Mackwell,
Krista M. Soderlund,
Pierre Beck,
Emma Bunce,
Sébastien Charnoz,
Bernard Foing,
Valerio Filice,
Leigh N. Fletcher,
François Forget,
Léa Griton,
Heidi Hammel,
Dennis Höning,
Takeshi Imamura,
Caitriona Jackman,
Yohai Kaspi,
Oleg Korablev,
Jérémy Leconte,
Emmanuel Lellouch,
Bernard Marty,
Nicolas Mangold,
Patrick Michel,
Alessandro Morbidelli,
Olivier Mousis
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This chapter of the Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report reviews the way the six key questions about planetary systems, from their origins to the way they work and their habitability, identified in chapter 1, can be addressed by means of solar system exploration, and how one can find partial answers to these six questions by flying to the different provinces to the solar system: terrestrial p…
▽ More
This chapter of the Planetary Exploration Horizon 2061 Report reviews the way the six key questions about planetary systems, from their origins to the way they work and their habitability, identified in chapter 1, can be addressed by means of solar system exploration, and how one can find partial answers to these six questions by flying to the different provinces to the solar system: terrestrial planets, giant planets, small bodies, and up to its interface with the local interstellar medium. It derives from this analysis a synthetic description of the most important space observations to be performed at the different solar system objects by future planetary exploration missions. These observation requirements illustrate the diversity of measurement techniques to be used as well as the diversity of destinations where these observations must be made. They constitute the base for the identification of the future planetary missions we need to fly by 2061, which are described in chapter 4. Q1- How well do we understand the diversity of planetary systems objects? Q2- How well do we understand the diversity of planetary system architectures? Q3- What are the origins and formation scenarios for planetary systems? Q4- How do planetary systems work? Q5- Do planetary systems host potential habitats? Q6- Where and how to search for life?
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Observational constraints on the formation and evolution of Neptune-class exoplanets
Authors:
M. Deleuil,
D. Pollacco,
C. Baruteau,
H. Rauer,
M. Blanc
Abstract:
Among exoplanets, the small-size population constitutes the dominant one, with a diversity of properties and compositions ranging from rocky to gas dominated envelope. While a large fraction of them have masses and radii similar to or smaller than Neptune, yet none share common properties in term of orbital period and insulation with our ice giants. These exoplanets belong to multi-planet systems…
▽ More
Among exoplanets, the small-size population constitutes the dominant one, with a diversity of properties and compositions ranging from rocky to gas dominated envelope. While a large fraction of them have masses and radii similar to or smaller than Neptune, yet none share common properties in term of orbital period and insulation with our ice giants. These exoplanets belong to multi-planet systems where planets are closely packed within the first tenth of AU and often exposed to strong irradiation from their host star. Their formation process, subsequent evolution, and fate are still debated and trigger new developments of planet formation models. This paper reviews the characteristics and properties of this extended sample of planets with radii between $\sim$ 1.6 and 4.0$_\oplus$. Even though we still lack real Neptune/Uranus analogues, these exoplanets provide us with key observational constraints that allow the formation of our ice giants to be placed in a more general framework than the sole example of our solar system.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
In situ Exploration of the Giant Planets
Authors:
Olivier Mousis,
David H. Atkinson,
Richard Ambrosi,
Sushil Atreya,
Don Banfield,
Stas Barabash,
Michel Blanc,
Thibault Cavalié,
Athena Coustenis,
Magali Deleuil,
Georges Durry,
Francesca Ferri,
Leigh Fletcher,
Thierry Fouchet,
Tristan Guillot,
Paul Hartogh,
Ricardo Hueso,
Mark Hofstadter,
Jean-Pierre Lebreton,
Kathleen E. Mandt,
Heike Rauer,
Pascal Rannou,
Jean-Baptiste Renard,
Agustin Sanchez-Lávega,
Kunio Sayanagi
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Remote sensing observations suffer significant limitations when used to study the bulk atmospheric composition of the giant planets of our solar system. This impacts our knowledge of the formation of these planets and the physics of their atmospheres. A remarkable example of the superiority of in situ probe measurements was illustrated by the exploration of Jupiter, where key measurements such as…
▽ More
Remote sensing observations suffer significant limitations when used to study the bulk atmospheric composition of the giant planets of our solar system. This impacts our knowledge of the formation of these planets and the physics of their atmospheres. A remarkable example of the superiority of in situ probe measurements was illustrated by the exploration of Jupiter, where key measurements such as the determination of the noble gases' abundances and the precise measurement of the helium mixing ratio were only made available through in situ measurements by the Galileo probe. Here we describe the main scientific goals to be addressed by the future in situ exploration of Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, placing the Galileo probe exploration of Jupiter in a broader context. An atmospheric entry probe targeting the 10-bar level would yield insight into two broad themes: i) the formation history of the giant planets and that of the Solar System, and ii) the processes at play in planetary atmospheres. The probe would descend under parachute to measure composition, structure, and dynamics, with data returned to Earth using a Carrier Relay Spacecraft as a relay station. An atmospheric probe could represent a significant ESA contribution to a future NASA New Frontiers or flagship mission to be launched toward Saturn, Uranus, and/or Neptune.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Scientific rationale for Uranus and Neptune in situ explorations
Authors:
O. Mousis,
D. H. Atkinson,
T. Cavalié,
L. N. Fletcher,
M. J. Amato,
S. Aslam,
F. Ferri,
J. -B. Renard,
T. Spilker,
E. Venkatapathy,
P. Wurz,
K. Aplin,
A. Coustenis,
M. Deleuil,
M. Dobrijevic,
T. Fouchet,
T. Guillot,
P. Hartogh,
T. Hewagama,
M. D. Hofstadter,
V. Hue,
R. Hueso,
J. -P. Lebreton,
E. Lellouch,
J. Moses
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The ice giants Uranus and Neptune are the least understood class of planets in our solar system but the most frequently observed type of exoplanets. Presumed to have a small rocky core, a deep interior comprising ~70% heavy elements surrounded by a more dilute outer envelope of H2 and He, Uranus and Neptune are fundamentally different from the better-explored gas giants Jupiter and Saturn. Because…
▽ More
The ice giants Uranus and Neptune are the least understood class of planets in our solar system but the most frequently observed type of exoplanets. Presumed to have a small rocky core, a deep interior comprising ~70% heavy elements surrounded by a more dilute outer envelope of H2 and He, Uranus and Neptune are fundamentally different from the better-explored gas giants Jupiter and Saturn. Because of the lack of dedicated exploration missions, our knowledge of the composition and atmospheric processes of these distant worlds is primarily derived from remote sensing from Earth-based observatories and space telescopes. As a result, Uranus's and Neptune's physical and atmospheric properties remain poorly constrained and their roles in the evolution of the Solar System not well understood. Exploration of an ice giant system is therefore a high-priority science objective as these systems (including the magnetosphere, satellites, rings, atmosphere, and interior) challenge our understanding of planetary formation and evolution. Here we describe the main scientific goals to be addressed by a future in situ exploration of an ice giant. An atmospheric entry probe targeting the 10-bar level, about 5 scale heights beneath the tropopause, would yield insight into two broad themes: i) the formation history of the ice giants and, in a broader extent, that of the Solar System, and ii) the processes at play in planetary atmospheres. The probe would descend under parachute to measure composition, structure, and dynamics, with data returned to Earth using a Carrier Relay Spacecraft as a relay station. In addition, possible mission concepts and partnerships are presented, and a strawman ice-giant probe payload is described. An ice-giant atmospheric probe could represent a significant ESA contribution to a future NASA ice-giant flagship mission.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Scientific rationale of Saturn's in situ exploration
Authors:
O. Mousis,
L. N. Fletcher,
J. -P. Lebreton,
P. Wurz,
T. Cavalié,
A. Coustenis,
R. Courtin,
D. Gautier,
R. Helled,
P. G. J. Irwin,
A. D. Morse,
N. Nettelmann,
B. Marty,
P. Rousselot,
O. Venot,
D. H. Atkinson,
J. H. Waite,
K. R. Reh,
A. Simon-Miller,
S. Atreya,
N. André,
M. Blanc,
I. A. Daglis,
G. Fischer,
W. D. Geppert
, et al. (25 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Remote sensing observations meet some limitations when used to study the bulk atmospheric composition of the giant planets of our solar system. A remarkable example of the superiority of in situ probe measurements is illustrated by the exploration of Jupiter, where key measurements such as the determination of the noble gases abundances and the precise measurement of the helium mixing ratio have o…
▽ More
Remote sensing observations meet some limitations when used to study the bulk atmospheric composition of the giant planets of our solar system. A remarkable example of the superiority of in situ probe measurements is illustrated by the exploration of Jupiter, where key measurements such as the determination of the noble gases abundances and the precise measurement of the helium mixing ratio have only been made available through in situ measurements by the Galileo probe. This paper describes the main scientific goals to be addressed by the future in situ exploration of Saturn placing the Galileo probe exploration of Jupiter in a broader context and before the future probe exploration of the more remote ice giants. In situ exploration of Saturn's atmosphere addresses two broad themes that are discussed throughout this paper: first, the formation history of our solar system and second, the processes at play in planetary atmospheres. In this context, we detail the reasons why measurements of Saturn's bulk elemental and isotopic composition would place important constraints on the volatile reservoirs in the protosolar nebula. We also show that the in situ measurement of CO (or any other disequilibrium species that is depleted by reaction with water) in Saturn's upper troposphere would constrain its bulk O/H ratio. We highlight the key measurements required to distinguish competing theories to shed light on giant planet formation as a common process in planetary systems with potential applications to most extrasolar systems. In situ measurements of Saturn's stratospheric and tropospheric dynamics, chemistry and cloud-forming processes will provide access to phenomena unreachable to remote sensing studies. Different mission architectures are envisaged, which would benefit from strong international collaborations.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
-
Constraints from deuterium on the formation of icy bodies in the Jovian system and beyond
Authors:
Jonathan Horner,
Olivier Mousis,
Yann Alibert,
Jonathan I. Lunine,
Michel Blanc
Abstract:
We consider the role of deuterium as a potential marker of location and ambient conditions during the formation of small bodies in our Solar system. We concentrate in particular on the formation of the regular icy satellites of Jupiter and the other giant planets, but include a discussion of the implications for the Trojan asteroids and the irregular satellites. We examine in detail the formatio…
▽ More
We consider the role of deuterium as a potential marker of location and ambient conditions during the formation of small bodies in our Solar system. We concentrate in particular on the formation of the regular icy satellites of Jupiter and the other giant planets, but include a discussion of the implications for the Trojan asteroids and the irregular satellites. We examine in detail the formation of regular planetary satellites within the paradigm of a circum-Jovian subnebula. Particular attention is paid to the two extreme potential subnebulae - "hot" and "cold". In particular, we show that, for the case of the "hot" subnebula model, the D:H ratio in water ice measured from the regular satellites would be expected to be near-Solar. In contrast, satellites which formed in a "cold" subnebula would be expected to display a D:H ratio that is distinctly over-Solar. We then compare the results obtained with the enrichment regimes which could be expected for other families of icy small bodies in the outer Solar system - the Trojan asteroids and the irregular satellites. In doing so, we demonstrate how measurements by Laplace, the James Webb Space Telescope, HERSCHEL and ALMA will play an important role in determining the true formation locations and mechanisms of these objects.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2008;
originally announced August 2008.
-
DARWIN - A Mission to Detect, and Search for Life on, Extrasolar Planets
Authors:
C. S. Cockell,
A. Leger,
M. Fridlund,
T. Herbst,
L. Kaltenegger,
O. Absil,
C. Beichman,
W. Benz,
M. Blanc,
A. Brack,
A. Chelli,
L. Colangeli,
H. Cottin,
V. Coude du Foresto,
W. Danchi,
D. Defrere,
J. -W. den Herder,
C. Eiroa,
J. Greaves,
T. Henning,
K. Johnston,
H. Jones,
L. Labadie,
H. Lammer,
R. Launhardt
, et al. (25 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The discovery of extra-solar planets is one of the greatest achievements of modern astronomy. The detection of planets with a wide range of masses demonstrates that extra-solar planets of low mass exist. In this paper we describe a mission, called Darwin, whose primary goal is the search for, and characterization of, terrestrial extrasolar planets and the search for life. Accomplishing the missi…
▽ More
The discovery of extra-solar planets is one of the greatest achievements of modern astronomy. The detection of planets with a wide range of masses demonstrates that extra-solar planets of low mass exist. In this paper we describe a mission, called Darwin, whose primary goal is the search for, and characterization of, terrestrial extrasolar planets and the search for life. Accomplishing the mission objectives will require collaborative science across disciplines including astrophysics, planetary sciences, chemistry and microbiology. Darwin is designed to detect and perform spectroscopic analysis of rocky planets similar to the Earth at mid-infrared wavelengths (6 - 20 micron), where an advantageous contrast ratio between star and planet occurs. The baseline mission lasts 5 years and consists of approximately 200 individual target stars. Among these, 25 to 50 planetary systems can be studied spectroscopically, searching for gases such as CO2, H2O, CH4 and O3. Many of the key technologies required for the construction of Darwin have already been demonstrated and the remainder are estimated to be mature in the near future. Darwin is a mission that will ignite intense interest in both the research community and the wider public.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2008;
originally announced May 2008.
