-
'Weather' in the LSST Camera: Investigating Patterns in Differenced Flat Images
Authors:
John Banovetz,
Yousuke Utsumi,
Joshua Meyers,
Maya Beleznay,
Andrew Rasmussen,
Aaron Roodman
Abstract:
During electro-optical testing of the camera for the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time, a unique low-signal pattern was found in differenced pairs of flat images used to create photon transfer curves, with peak-to-peak variations of a factor of 10^-3. A turbulent pattern of this amplitude was apparent in many differenced flat-fielded images. The pattern changes fro…
▽ More
During electro-optical testing of the camera for the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time, a unique low-signal pattern was found in differenced pairs of flat images used to create photon transfer curves, with peak-to-peak variations of a factor of 10^-3. A turbulent pattern of this amplitude was apparent in many differenced flat-fielded images. The pattern changes from image to image and shares similarities with atmospheric 'weather' turbulence patterns. We applied several strategies to determine the source of the turbulent pattern and found that it is representative of the mixing of the air and index of refraction variations caused by the internal camera purge system displacing air, which we are sensitive to due to our flat field project setup. Characterizing this changing environment with 2-D correlation functions of the 'weather' patterns provides evidence that the images reflect the changes in the camera environment due to the internal camera purge system. Simulations of the full optical system using the galsim and batoid codes show that the weather pattern affects the dispersion of the camera point-spread function at only the one part in 10^-4 level
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Exploring the Dependence of Hot Jupiter Occurrence Rates on Stellar Mass with TESS
Authors:
Maya Beleznay,
Michelle Kunimoto
Abstract:
We present estimates for the occurrence rates of hot Jupiters around dwarf stars based on data from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) Prime Mission. We take 97 hot Jupiters orbiting 198,721 AFG dwarf stars (ranging in mass from $0.8M_{\odot}$ to $2.3M_{\odot}$) from an independent search for hot Jupiters using TESS Prime Mission data. We estimate our planet sample's false positive r…
▽ More
We present estimates for the occurrence rates of hot Jupiters around dwarf stars based on data from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) Prime Mission. We take 97 hot Jupiters orbiting 198,721 AFG dwarf stars (ranging in mass from $0.8M_{\odot}$ to $2.3M_{\odot}$) from an independent search for hot Jupiters using TESS Prime Mission data. We estimate our planet sample's false positive rates as $14\pm7\%$ for A stars, $16\pm6\%$ for F stars, and $0\%$ for G stars. We find hot Jupiter occurrence rates of $0.29 \pm 0.05\%$ for A stars, $0.36 \pm 0.06\%$ for F stars and $0.55 \pm 0.14\%$ for G stars, with a weighted average across AFG stars of $0.33\pm0.04\%$. Our results show a correlation between higher hot Jupiter abundance and lower stellar mass, and are in good agreement with occurrence rates found by Kepler. After correcting for the presence of binaries in the TESS stellar sample, we estimate a single-star hot Jupiter occurrence rate of $0.98\pm0.36\%$ for G stars. This is in agreement with results from radial velocity (RV) surveys, indicating that stellar multiplicity correction is able to resolve the discrepancy between hot Jupiter occurrence rates based on transits and RVs.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
The structure of cluster merger shocks: turbulent width and the electron heating timescale
Authors:
H. R. Russell,
P. E. J. Nulsen,
D. Caprioli,
U. Chadayammuri,
A. C. Fabian,
M. W. Kunz,
B. R. McNamara,
J. S. Sanders,
A. Richard-Laferrière,
M. Beleznay,
R. E. A. Canning,
J. Hlavacek-Larrondo,
L. J. King
Abstract:
We present a new 2 Ms Chandra observation of the cluster merger Abell 2146, which hosts two huge M~2 shock fronts each ~500 kpc across. For the first time, we resolve and measure the width of cluster merger shocks. The best-fit width for the bow shock is 17+/-1 kpc and for the upstream shock is 10.7+/-0.3 kpc. A narrow collisionless shock will appear broader in projection if its smooth shape is wa…
▽ More
We present a new 2 Ms Chandra observation of the cluster merger Abell 2146, which hosts two huge M~2 shock fronts each ~500 kpc across. For the first time, we resolve and measure the width of cluster merger shocks. The best-fit width for the bow shock is 17+/-1 kpc and for the upstream shock is 10.7+/-0.3 kpc. A narrow collisionless shock will appear broader in projection if its smooth shape is warped by local gas motions. We show that both shock widths are consistent with collisionless shocks blurred by local gas motions of 290+/-30 km/s. The upstream shock forms later on in the merger than the bow shock and is therefore expected to be significantly narrower. From the electron temperature profile behind the bow shock, we measure the timescale for the electrons and ions to come back into thermal equilibrium. We rule out rapid thermal equilibration of the electrons with the shock-heated ions at the 6 sigma level. The observed temperature profile instead favours collisional equilibration. For these cluster merger shocks, which have low sonic Mach numbers and propagate through a high $β$ plasma, we find no evidence for electron heating over that produced by adiabatic compression. Our findings are expected to be valid for collisionless shocks with similar parameters in other environments and support the existing picture from the solar wind and supernova remnants. The upstream shock is consistent with this result but has a more complex structure, including a ~2 keV increase in temperature ~50 kpc ahead of the shock.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2022; v1 submitted 8 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
