Investigating the relation between environment and internal structure of massive elliptical galaxies using strong lensing
Authors:
S M Rafee Adnan,
Muhammad Jobair Hasan,
Ahmad Al-Imtiaz,
Sulyman H. Robin,
Fahim R. Shwadhin,
Anowar J. Shajib,
Mamun Hossain Nahid,
Mehedi Hasan Tanver,
Tanjela Akter,
Nusrath Jahan,
Zareef Jafar,
Mamunur Rashid,
Anik Biswas,
Akbar Ahmed Chowdhury,
Jannatul Feardous,
Ajmi Rahaman,
Masuk Ridwan,
Rahul D. Sharma,
Zannat Chowdhury,
Mir Sazzat Hossain
Abstract:
Strong lensing by massive galaxies probes their mass distribution, thus providing a window to study their internal structure, i.e., the distributions of luminous and dark matter. In this paper, we investigate the relation between the internal structure of massive elliptical galaxies and their environment using a sample of 15 strong lensing systems. We performed lens modeling for them using Lenstro…
▽ More
Strong lensing by massive galaxies probes their mass distribution, thus providing a window to study their internal structure, i.e., the distributions of luminous and dark matter. In this paper, we investigate the relation between the internal structure of massive elliptical galaxies and their environment using a sample of 15 strong lensing systems. We performed lens modeling for them using Lenstronomy and constrained the mass and light distributions of the deflector galaxies. We adopt the local galaxy density as a metric for the environment and test our results against several alternative definitions of it. We robustly find that the centroid offset between the mass and light is not correlated with the local galaxy density. This result supports using centroid offsets as a probe of dark matter theories since the environment's impact on it can be treated as negligible. Although we find a moderate to strong correlation between the position angle offset and the standard definition of the local galaxy density, consistent with previous studies, the correlation becomes weaker for alternative definitions of the local galaxy density. This result weakens the support for interpreting the position angle misalignment as having originated from interaction with the environment. Furthermore, we find the 'residual shear' magnitude in the lens model to be uncorrelated with the local galaxy density, supporting the interpretation of the residual shear originating, in part, from the inadequacy in modeling the angular structure of the lensing galaxy and not solely from the structures present in the environment or along the line of sight.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2025; v1 submitted 30 November, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
The Galaxy Zoo Catalogs for the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) Survey
Authors:
Benne W. Holwerda,
Clayton Robertson,
Kyle Cook,
Kevin A. Pimbblet,
Sarah Casura,
Anne E. Sansom,
Divya Patel,
Trevor Butrum,
David H. W. Glass,
Lee Kelvin,
Ivan K. Baldry,
Roberto De Propris,
Steven Bamford,
Karen Masters,
Maria Stone,
Tim Hardin,
Mike Walmsley,
Jochen Liske,
S M Rafee Adnan
Abstract:
Galaxy Zoo is an online project to classify morphological features in extra-galactic imaging surveys with public voting. In this paper, we compare the classifications made for two different surveys, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) imaging survey and a part of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), in the equatorial fields of the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. Our aim is to cross-v…
▽ More
Galaxy Zoo is an online project to classify morphological features in extra-galactic imaging surveys with public voting. In this paper, we compare the classifications made for two different surveys, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) imaging survey and a part of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), in the equatorial fields of the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. Our aim is to cross-validate and compare the classifications based on different imaging quality and depth.
We find that generally the voting agrees globally but with substantial scatter i.e. substantial differences for individual galaxies. There is a notable higher voting fraction in favor of ``smooth'' galaxies in the DESI+\rev{\sc zoobot} classifications, most likely due to the difference between imaging depth. DESI imaging is shallower and slightly lower resolution than KiDS and the Galaxy Zoo images do not reveal details such as disk features \rev{and thus are missed in the {\sc zoobot} training sample}. \rev{We check against expert visual classifications and find good agreement with KiDS-based Galaxy Zoo voting.}
We reproduce the results from Porter-Temple+ (2022), on the dependence of stellar mass, star-formation, and specific star-formation on the number of spiral arms. This shows that once corrected for redshift, the DESI Galaxy Zoo and KiDS Galaxy Zoo classifications agree well on population properties. The zoobot cross-validation increases confidence in its ability to compliment Galaxy Zoo classifications and its ability for transfer learning across surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
