Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Young, L J

Adjusting for Misclassification: A Three-Phase Sampling Approach

Authors: Hailin Sang, Kenneth K. Lopiano, Denise A. Abreu, Andrea C. Lamas, Pam Arroway, Linda J. Young

Abstract: The United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) conducts the June Agricultural Survey (JAS) annually. Substantial misclassification occurs during the pre-screening process and from field-estimating farm status for non-response and inaccessible records, resulting in a biased estimate of the number of US farms from the JAS. Here the Annual Land Utilizati… ▽ More The United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) conducts the June Agricultural Survey (JAS) annually. Substantial misclassification occurs during the pre-screening process and from field-estimating farm status for non-response and inaccessible records, resulting in a biased estimate of the number of US farms from the JAS. Here the Annual Land Utilization Survey (ALUS) is proposed as a follow-on survey to the JAS to adjust the estimates of the number of US farms and other important variables. A three-phase survey design-based estimator is developed for the JAS-ALUS with non-response adjustment for the second phase (ALUS). A design-unbiased estimator of the variance is provided in explicit form. △ Less

Submitted 14 October, 2016; v1 submitted 14 June, 2013; originally announced June 2013.

Comments: 30 pages, to appear at Journal of Official Statistics

MSC Class: 62D05

Make Research Data Public? -- Not Always so Simple: A Dialogue for Statisticians and Science Editors

Authors: Nell Sedransk, Lawrence H. Cox, Deborah Nolan, Keith Soper, Cliff Spiegelman, Linda J. Young, Katrina L. Kelner, Robert A. Moffitt, Ani Thakar, Jordan Raddick, Edward J. Ungvarsky, Richard W. Carlson, Rolf Apweiler

Abstract: Putting data into the public domain is not the same thing as making those data accessible for intelligent analysis. A distinguished group of editors and experts who were already engaged in one way or another with the issues inherent in making research data public came together with statisticians to initiate a dialogue about policies and practicalities of requiring published research to be accompan… ▽ More Putting data into the public domain is not the same thing as making those data accessible for intelligent analysis. A distinguished group of editors and experts who were already engaged in one way or another with the issues inherent in making research data public came together with statisticians to initiate a dialogue about policies and practicalities of requiring published research to be accompanied by publication of the research data. This dialogue carried beyond the broad issues of the advisability, the intellectual integrity, the scientific exigencies to the relevance of these issues to statistics as a discipline and the relevance of statistics, from inference to modeling to data exploration, to science and social science policies on these issues. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2010; originally announced November 2010.

Comments: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-STS320 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

Report number: IMS-STS-STS320

Journal ref: Statistical Science 2010, Vol. 25, No. 1, 41-50