-
arXiv:2503.20236 [pdf, ps, other]
More on setwise climbability properties
Abstract: We introduce two types of variations of setwise climbability properties, which have been introduced by the second author as fragments of Jensen's square principles. We show that variations of the first type are equivalent to known principles and that they are consistent with the Proper Forcing Axiom(PFA). On the other hand, those of the second type can be characterized as Martin-type axioms for so… ▽ More
Submitted 26 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.
Comments: 27 pages
-
arXiv:1904.11168 [pdf, ps, other]
Properness under closed forcing
Abstract: For every uncountable regular $κ$, we give two examples of proper posets which turn improper in some $κ$-closed forcing extension.
Submitted 2 August, 2019; v1 submitted 25 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.
Comments: 7 pages, LaTeX, minor revision
MSC Class: 03E40 (Primary); 03E57 (Secondary)
-
arXiv:1503.06703 [pdf, ps, other]
The *-variation of the Banach-Mazur game and forcing axioms
Abstract: We introduce a property of posets which strengthens (ω_1+1)-strategic closedness. This property is defined using a variation of the Banach-Mazur game on posets, where the first player chooses a countable set of conditions instead of a single condition at each turn. We prove PFA is preserved under any forcing over a poset with this property. As an application we reproduce a proof of Magidor's theor… ▽ More
Submitted 4 January, 2017; v1 submitted 23 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.
Comments: 34 pages, minor revision, results unchanged
MSC Class: 03E57 (primary); 03E35 (secondary)
-
arXiv:math/0605130 [pdf, ps, other]
Kurepa-trees and Namba-forcing
Abstract: We show that compact cardinals and {\rm MM} are sensitive to $λ$-closed forcings for arbitrarily large $λ$. This is done by adding 'regressive' $λ$-Kurepa-trees in either case. We argue that the destruction of regressive Kurepa-trees with {\rm MM} requires the use of Namba forcing.
Submitted 4 May, 2006; originally announced May 2006.
-
arXiv:math/0412547 [pdf, ps, other]
How many miles to beta-X? -- d miles, or just one foot
Abstract: It is known that the Stone-Cech compactification of a metrizable space X is approximated by the collection of Smirnov compactifications of X for all compatible metrics on X. If we confine ourselves to locally compact separable metrizable spaces, the corresponding statement holds for Higson compactifications. We investigate the smallest cardinality of a set D of compatible metrics on X such that… ▽ More
Submitted 25 February, 2006; v1 submitted 30 December, 2004; originally announced December 2004.
Comments: V2: minor linguistic corrections
MSC Class: 54D35; 03E17
-
arXiv:math/0405311 [pdf, ps, other]
How many miles to $βω$? -- Approximating $βω$ by metric-dependent compactifications
Abstract: It is known that the Stone-Čech compactification of a non-compact metrizable space $X$ is approximated by the collection of Smirnov compactifications of $X$ for all compatible metrics on $X$. We investigate the smallest cardinality of a set $D$ of compatible metrics on the countable discrete space $ω$ such that, the Stone-Čech compactification of $ω$ is approximated by Smirnov compactifications… ▽ More
Submitted 21 July, 2004; v1 submitted 16 May, 2004; originally announced May 2004.
Comments: v3: Unified old sections 1 and 2 into new section 1, and deleted some basic lemmata to shorten the article
MSC Class: 03E17; 03E35; 54D35; 54H05