Online Circle and Sphere Packing
Authors:
Carla Negri Lintzmayer,
Flávio Keidi Miyazawa,
Eduardo Candido Xavier
Abstract:
In this paper we consider the Online Bin Packing Problem in three variants: Circles in Squares, Circles in Isosceles Right Triangles, and Spheres in Cubes. The two first ones receive an online sequence of circles (items) of different radii while the third one receive an online sequence of spheres (items) of different radii, and they want to pack the items into the minimum number of unit squares, i…
▽ More
In this paper we consider the Online Bin Packing Problem in three variants: Circles in Squares, Circles in Isosceles Right Triangles, and Spheres in Cubes. The two first ones receive an online sequence of circles (items) of different radii while the third one receive an online sequence of spheres (items) of different radii, and they want to pack the items into the minimum number of unit squares, isosceles right triangles of leg length one, and unit cubes, respectively. For Online Circle Packing in Squares, we improve the previous best-known competitive ratio for the bounded space version, when at most a constant number of bins can be open at any given time, from 2.439 to 2.3536. For Online Circle Packing in Isosceles Right Triangles and Online Sphere Packing in Cubes we show bounded space algorithms of asymptotic competitive ratios 2.5490 and 3.5316, respectively, as well as lower bounds of 2.1193 and 2.7707 on the competitive ratio of any online bounded space algorithm for these two problems. We also considered the online unbounded space variant of these three problems which admits a small reorganization of the items inside the bin after their packing, and we present algorithms of competitive ratios 2.3105, 2.5094, and 3.5146 for Circles in Squares, Circles in Isosceles Right Triangles, and Spheres in Cubes, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
Locality-preserving allocations Problems and coloured Bin Packing
Authors:
Andrew Twigg,
Eduardo C. Xavier
Abstract:
We study the following problem, introduced by Chung et al. in 2006. We are given, online or offline, a set of coloured items of different sizes, and wish to pack them into bins of equal size so that we use few bins in total (at most $α$ times optimal), and that the items of each colour span few bins (at most $β$ times optimal). We call such allocations $(α, β)$-approximate. As usual in bin packing…
▽ More
We study the following problem, introduced by Chung et al. in 2006. We are given, online or offline, a set of coloured items of different sizes, and wish to pack them into bins of equal size so that we use few bins in total (at most $α$ times optimal), and that the items of each colour span few bins (at most $β$ times optimal). We call such allocations $(α, β)$-approximate. As usual in bin packing problems, we allow additive constants and consider $(α,β)$ as the asymptotic performance ratios. We prove that for $\eps>0$, if we desire small $α$, no scheme can beat $(1+\eps, Ω(1/\eps))$-approximate allocations and similarly as we desire small $β$, no scheme can beat $(1.69103, 1+\eps)$-approximate allocations. We give offline schemes that come very close to achieving these lower bounds. For the online case, we prove that no scheme can even achieve $(O(1),O(1))$-approximate allocations. However, a small restriction on item sizes permits a simple online scheme that computes $(2+\eps, 1.7)$-approximate allocations.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
