-
Extending Behavior Trees for Robotic Missions with Quality Requirements
Authors:
Razan Ghzouli,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Jennifer Horkoff
Abstract:
Context and motivation: In recent years, behavior trees have gained growing interest within the robotics community as a specification and control switching mechanism for the different tasks that form a robotics mission. Problem: Given the rising complexity and prevalence of robotic systems, it is increasingly challenging and important for practitioners to design high-quality missions that meet cer…
▽ More
Context and motivation: In recent years, behavior trees have gained growing interest within the robotics community as a specification and control switching mechanism for the different tasks that form a robotics mission. Problem: Given the rising complexity and prevalence of robotic systems, it is increasingly challenging and important for practitioners to design high-quality missions that meet certain qualities, for instance, to consider potential failures or mitigate safety risks. In software requirements engineering, quality or non-functional requirements have long been recognized as a key factor in system success. Currently, qualities are not represented in behavior tree models, which capture a robotic mission, making it difficult to assess the extent to which different mission components comply with those qualities. Principal ideas: In this paper, we propose an extension for behavior trees to have qualities and quality requirements explicitly represented in robotics missions. We provide a meta-model for the extension, develop a domain-specific language (DSL), and describe how we integrated our DSL in one of the most used languages in robotics for developing behavior trees, BehaviorTree.CPP. A preliminary evaluation of the implemented DSL shows promising results for the feasibility of our approach and the need for similar DSLs. Contribution: Our approach paves the way for incorporating qualities into the behavior model of robotics missions. This promotes early expression of qualities in robotics missions, and a better overview of missions components and their contribution to the satisfaction of quality concerns.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Towards a Value-Complemented Framework for Enabling Human Monitoring in Cyber-Physical Systems
Authors:
Zoe Pfister,
Michael Vierhauser,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Ruth Breu
Abstract:
[Context and Motivation]: Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) have become relevant in a wide variety of different domains, integrating hardware and software, often operating in an emerging and uncertain environment where human actors actively or passively engage with the CPS. To ensure correct and safe operation, and self-adaptation, monitors are used for collecting and analyzing diverse runtime informat…
▽ More
[Context and Motivation]: Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) have become relevant in a wide variety of different domains, integrating hardware and software, often operating in an emerging and uncertain environment where human actors actively or passively engage with the CPS. To ensure correct and safe operation, and self-adaptation, monitors are used for collecting and analyzing diverse runtime information. [Problem]: However, monitoring humans at runtime, collecting potentially sensitive information about their actions and behavior, comes with significant ramifications that can severely hamper the successful integration of human-machine collaboration. Requirements engineering (RE) activities must integrate diverse human values, including Privacy, Security, and Self-Direction during system design, to avoid involuntary data sharing or misuse. [Principal Ideas]: In this research preview, we focus on the importance of incorporating these aspects in the RE lifecycle of eliciting and creating runtime monitors. [Contribution]: We derived an initial conceptual framework, building on the value taxonomy introduced by Schwartz and human value integrated Software Engineering by Whittle, further leveraging the concept of value tactics. The goal is to tie functional and non-functional monitoring requirements to human values and establish traceability between values, requirements, and actors. Based on this, we lay out a research roadmap guiding our ongoing work in this area.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2025; v1 submitted 11 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Human Factors in Model-Driven Engineering: Future Research Goals and Initiatives for MDE
Authors:
Grischa Liebel,
Jil Klünder,
Regina Hebig,
Christopher Lazik,
Inês Nunes,
Isabella Graßl,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Joeri Exelmans,
Julian Oertel,
Kai Marquardt,
Katharina Juhnke,
Kurt Schneider,
Lucas Gren,
Lucia Happe,
Marc Herrmann,
Marvin Wyrich,
Matthias Tichy,
Miguel Goulão,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Reyhaneh Kalantari,
Robert Heinrich,
Sandra Greiner,
Satrio Adi Rukmono,
Shalini Chakraborty,
Silvia Abrahão
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Purpose: Software modelling and Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is traditionally studied from a technical perspective. However, one of the core motivations behind the use of software models is inherently human-centred. Models aim to enable practitioners to communicate about software designs, make software understandable, or make software easier to write through domain-specific modelling languages.…
▽ More
Purpose: Software modelling and Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) is traditionally studied from a technical perspective. However, one of the core motivations behind the use of software models is inherently human-centred. Models aim to enable practitioners to communicate about software designs, make software understandable, or make software easier to write through domain-specific modelling languages. Several recent studies challenge the idea that these aims can always be reached and indicate that human factors play a role in the success of MDE. However, there is an under-representation of research focusing on human factors in modelling. Methods: During a GI-Dagstuhl seminar, topics related to human factors in modelling were discussed by 26 expert participants from research and industry. Results: In breakout groups, five topics were covered in depth, namely modelling human aspects, factors of modeller experience, diversity and inclusion in MDE, collaboration and MDE, and teaching human-aware MDE. Conclusion: We summarise our insights gained during the discussions on the five topics. We formulate research goals, questions, and propositions that support directing future initiatives towards an MDE community that is aware of and supportive of human factors and values.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Guidelines for Artifacts to Support Industry-Relevant Research on Self-Adaptation
Authors:
Danny Weyns,
Ilias Gerostathopoulos,
Barbora Buhnova,
Nicolas Cardozo,
Emilia Cioroaica,
Ivana Dusparic,
Lars Grunske,
Pooyan Jamshidi,
Christine Julien,
Judith Michael,
Gabriel Moreno,
Shiva Nejati,
Patrizio Pelliccione,
Federico Quin,
Genaina Rodrigues,
Bradley Schmerl,
Marco Vieira,
Thomas Vogel,
Rebekka Wohlrab
Abstract:
Artifacts support evaluating new research results and help comparing them with the state of the art in a field of interest. Over the past years, several artifacts have been introduced to support research in the field of self-adaptive systems. While these artifacts have shown their value, it is not clear to what extent these artifacts support research on problems in self-adaptation that are relevan…
▽ More
Artifacts support evaluating new research results and help comparing them with the state of the art in a field of interest. Over the past years, several artifacts have been introduced to support research in the field of self-adaptive systems. While these artifacts have shown their value, it is not clear to what extent these artifacts support research on problems in self-adaptation that are relevant to industry. This paper provides a set of guidelines for artifacts that aim at supporting industry-relevant research on self-adaptation. The guidelines that are grounded on data obtained from a survey with practitioners were derived during working sessions at the 17th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems. Artifact providers can use the guidelines for aligning future artifacts with industry needs; they can also be used to evaluate the industrial relevance of existing artifacts. We also propose an artifact template.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Managing Traceability Information Models: Not such a simple task after all?
Authors:
Salome Maro,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Eric Knauss,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Rashidah Kasauli,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Jesper Lysemose Korsgaard,
Florian Wartenberg,
Niels Jørgen Strøm,
Ruben Alexandersson
Abstract:
Practitioners are poorly supported by the scientific literature when managing traceability information models (TIMs), which capture the structure and semantics of trace links. In practice, companies manage their TIMs in very different ways, even in cases where companies share many similarities. We present our findings from an in-depth focus group about TIM management with three different systems e…
▽ More
Practitioners are poorly supported by the scientific literature when managing traceability information models (TIMs), which capture the structure and semantics of trace links. In practice, companies manage their TIMs in very different ways, even in cases where companies share many similarities. We present our findings from an in-depth focus group about TIM management with three different systems engineering companies. We find that the concrete needs of the companies as well as challenges such as scale and workflow integration are not considered by existing scientific work. We thus issue a call-to-arms for the requirements engineering and software and systems traceability communities, the two main communities for traceability research, to refocus their work on these practical problems.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Defining Utility Functions for Multi-Stakeholder Self-Adaptive Systems
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
David Garlan
Abstract:
[Context and motivation:] For realistic self-adaptive systems, multiple quality attributes need to be considered and traded off against each other. These quality attributes are commonly encoded in a utility function, for instance, a weighted sum of relevant objectives. [Question/problem:] The research agenda for requirements engineering for self-adaptive systems has raised the need for decision-ma…
▽ More
[Context and motivation:] For realistic self-adaptive systems, multiple quality attributes need to be considered and traded off against each other. These quality attributes are commonly encoded in a utility function, for instance, a weighted sum of relevant objectives. [Question/problem:] The research agenda for requirements engineering for self-adaptive systems has raised the need for decision-making techniques that consider the trade-offs and priorities of multiple objectives. Human stakeholders need to be engaged in the decision-making process so that the relative importance of each objective can be correctly elicited. [Principal ideas/results:] This research preview paper presents a method that supports multiple stakeholders in prioritizing relevant quality attributes, negotiating priorities to reach an agreement, and giving input to define utility functions for self-adaptive systems. [Contribution:] The proposed method constitutes a lightweight solution for utility function definition. It can be applied by practitioners and researchers who aim to develop self-adaptive systems that meet stakeholders' requirements. We present details of our plan to study the application of our method using a case study.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Modeling and Analysis of Boundary Objects and Methodological Islands in Large-Scale Systems Development
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Rashidah Kasauli,
Salome Maro,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Eric Knauss
Abstract:
Large-scale companies commonly face the challenge of managing relevant knowledge between different organizational groups, particularly in increasingly agile contexts. In previous studies, we found the importance of analyzing methodological islands (i.e., groups using different development methods than the surrounding organization) and boundary objects between them. In this paper, we propose a meta…
▽ More
Large-scale companies commonly face the challenge of managing relevant knowledge between different organizational groups, particularly in increasingly agile contexts. In previous studies, we found the importance of analyzing methodological islands (i.e., groups using different development methods than the surrounding organization) and boundary objects between them. In this paper, we propose a metamodel to better capture and analyze coordination and knowledge management in practice. Such a metamodel can allow practitioners to describe current practices, analyze issues, and design better-suited coordination mechanisms. We evaluated the conceptual model together with four large-scale companies developing complex systems. In particular, we derived an initial list of bad smells that can be leveraged to detect issues and devise suitable improvement strategies for inter-team coordination in large-scale development. We present the model, smells, and our evaluation results.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2020; v1 submitted 18 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Why and How Your Traceability Should Evolve: Insights from an Automotive Supplier
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Patrizio Pelliccione,
Ali Shahrokni,
Eric Knauss
Abstract:
Traceability is a key enabler of various activities in automotive software and systems engineering and required by several standards. However, most existing traceability management approaches do not consider that traceability is situated in constantly changing development contexts involving multiple stakeholders. Together with an automotive supplier, we analyzed how technology, business, and organ…
▽ More
Traceability is a key enabler of various activities in automotive software and systems engineering and required by several standards. However, most existing traceability management approaches do not consider that traceability is situated in constantly changing development contexts involving multiple stakeholders. Together with an automotive supplier, we analyzed how technology, business, and organizational factors raise the need for flexible traceability. We present how traceability can be evolved in the development lifecycle, from early elicitation of traceability needs to the implementation of mature traceability strategies. Moreover, we shed light on how traceability can be managed flexibly within an agile team and more formally when crossing team borders and organizational borders. Based on these insights, we present requirements for flexible tool solutions, supporting varying levels of data quality, change propagation, versioning, and organizational traceability.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Charting Coordination Needs in Large-Scale Agile Organisationswith Boundary Objects and Methodological Islands
Authors:
Rashidah Kasauli,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Eric Knauss,
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Salome Maro
Abstract:
Large-scale system development companies are increasingly adopting agile methods. While this adoption may improve lead-times, such companies need to balance two trade-offs: (i) the need to have a uniform, consistent development method on system level with the need for specialised methods for teams in different disciplines(e.g., hardware, software, mechanics, sales, support); (ii) the need for comp…
▽ More
Large-scale system development companies are increasingly adopting agile methods. While this adoption may improve lead-times, such companies need to balance two trade-offs: (i) the need to have a uniform, consistent development method on system level with the need for specialised methods for teams in different disciplines(e.g., hardware, software, mechanics, sales, support); (ii) the need for comprehensive documentation on system level with the need to have lightweight documentation enabling iterative and agile work. With specialised methods for teams, isolated teams work within larger ecosystems of plan-driven culture, i.e., teams become agile "islands". At the boundaries, these teams share knowledge which needs to be managed well for a correct system to be developed. While it is useful to support diverse and specialised methods, it is important to understand which islands are repeatedly encountered, the reasons or factors triggering their existence, and how best to handle coordination between them. Based on a multiple case study, this work presents a catalogue of islands and the boundary objects between them. We believe this work will be beneficial to practitioners aiming to understand their ecosystems and researchers addressing communication and coordination challenges in large-scale development.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Why and How to Balance Alignment and Diversity of Requirements Engineering Practices in Automotive
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Eric Knauss,
Patrizio Pelliccione
Abstract:
In large-scale automotive companies, various requirements engineering (RE) practices are used across teams. RE practices manifest in Requirements Information Models (RIM) that define what concepts and information should be captured for requirements. Collaboration of practitioners from different parts of an organization is required to define a suitable RIM that balances support for diverse practice…
▽ More
In large-scale automotive companies, various requirements engineering (RE) practices are used across teams. RE practices manifest in Requirements Information Models (RIM) that define what concepts and information should be captured for requirements. Collaboration of practitioners from different parts of an organization is required to define a suitable RIM that balances support for diverse practices in individual teams with the alignment needed for a shared view and team support on system level. There exists no guidance for this challenging task. This paper presents a mixed methods study to examine the role of RIMs in balancing alignment and diversity of RE practices in four automotive companies. Our analysis is based on data from systems engineering tools, 11 semi-structured interviews, and a survey to validate findings and suggestions. We found that balancing alignment and diversity of RE practices is important to consider when defining RIMs. We further investigated enablers for this balance and actions that practitioners take to achieve it. From these factors, we derived and evaluated recommendations for managing RIMs in practice that take into account the lifecycle of requirements and allow for diverse practices across sub-disciplines in early development, while enforcing alignment of requirements that are close to release.
△ Less
Submitted 6 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Challenges of Scaled Agile for Safety-Critical Systems
Authors:
Jan-Philipp Steghöfer,
Eric Knauss,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Rebekka Wohlrab
Abstract:
Automotive companies increasingly adopt scaled agile methods to allow them to deal with their organisational and product complexity. Suitable methods are needed to ensure safety when developing automotive systems. On a small scale, R-Scrum and SafeScrum are two concrete suggestions for how to develop safety-critical systems using agile methods. However, for large-scale environments, existing frame…
▽ More
Automotive companies increasingly adopt scaled agile methods to allow them to deal with their organisational and product complexity. Suitable methods are needed to ensure safety when developing automotive systems. On a small scale, R-Scrum and SafeScrum are two concrete suggestions for how to develop safety-critical systems using agile methods. However, for large-scale environments, existing frameworks like SAFe or LeSS do not support the development of safety-critical systems out of the box. We, therefore, aim to understand which challenges exist when developing safety-critical systems within large-scale agile industrial settings, in particular in the automotive domain. Based on an analysis of R-Scrum and SafeScrum, we conducted a focus group with three experts from industry to collect challenges in their daily work. We found challenges in the areas of living traceability, continuous compliance, and organisational flexibility. Among others, organisations struggle with defining a suitable traceability strategy, performing incremental safety analysis, and with integrating safety practices into their scaled way of working. Our results indicate a need to provide practical approaches to integrate safety work into large-scale agile development and point towards possible solutions, e.g., modular safety cases.
Keywords: Scaled Agile, Safety-Critical Systems, Software Processes, R-Scrum, SafeScrum
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Boundary Objects and their Use in Agile Systems Engineering
Authors:
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Patrizio Pelliccione,
Eric Knauss,
Mats Larsson
Abstract:
Agile methods are increasingly introduced in automotive companies in the attempt to become more efficient and flexible in the system development. The adoption of agile practices influences communication between stakeholders, but also makes companies rethink the management of artifacts and documentation like requirements, safety compliance documents, and architecture models. Practitioners aim to re…
▽ More
Agile methods are increasingly introduced in automotive companies in the attempt to become more efficient and flexible in the system development. The adoption of agile practices influences communication between stakeholders, but also makes companies rethink the management of artifacts and documentation like requirements, safety compliance documents, and architecture models. Practitioners aim to reduce irrelevant documentation, but face a lack of guidance to determine what artifacts are needed and how they should be managed. This paper presents artifacts, challenges, guidelines, and practices for the continuous management of systems engineering artifacts in automotive based on a theoretical and empirical understanding of the topic. In collaboration with 53 practitioners from six automotive companies, we conducted a design-science study involving interviews, a questionnaire, focus groups, and practical data analysis of a systems engineering tool. The guidelines suggest the distinction between artifacts that are shared among different actors in a company (boundary objects) and those that are used within a team (locally relevant artifacts). We propose an analysis approach to identify boundary objects and three practices to manage systems engineering artifacts in industry.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
T-Reqs: Tool Support for Managing Requirements in Large-Scale Agile System Development
Authors:
Eric Knauss,
Grischa Liebel,
Jennifer Horkoff,
Rebekka Wohlrab,
Rashidah Kasauli,
Filip Lange,
Pierre Gildert
Abstract:
T-Reqs is a text-based requirements management solution based on the git version control system. It combines useful conventions, templates and helper scripts with powerful existing solutions from the git ecosystem and provides a working solution to address some known requirements engineering challenges in large-scale agile system development. Specifically, it allows agile cross-functional teams to…
▽ More
T-Reqs is a text-based requirements management solution based on the git version control system. It combines useful conventions, templates and helper scripts with powerful existing solutions from the git ecosystem and provides a working solution to address some known requirements engineering challenges in large-scale agile system development. Specifically, it allows agile cross-functional teams to be aware of requirements at system level and enables them to efficiently propose updates to those requirements. Based on our experience with T-Reqs, we i) relate known requirements challenges of large-scale agile system development to tool support; ii) list key requirements for tooling in such a context; and iii) propose concrete solutions for challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2018; v1 submitted 7 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
