The Complexity of Cluster Vertex Splitting and Company
Authors:
Alexander Firbas,
Alexander Dobler,
Fabian Holzer,
Jakob Schafellner,
Manuel Sorge,
Anaïs Villedieu,
Monika Wißmann
Abstract:
Clustering a graph when the clusters can overlap can be seen from three different angles: We may look for cliques that cover the edges of the graph with bounded overlap, we may look to add or delete few edges to uncover the cluster structure, or we may split vertices to separate the clusters from each other. Splitting a vertex $v$ means to remove it and to add two new copies of $v$ and to make eac…
▽ More
Clustering a graph when the clusters can overlap can be seen from three different angles: We may look for cliques that cover the edges of the graph with bounded overlap, we may look to add or delete few edges to uncover the cluster structure, or we may split vertices to separate the clusters from each other. Splitting a vertex $v$ means to remove it and to add two new copies of $v$ and to make each previous neighbor of $v$ adjacent with at least one of the copies. In this work, we study underlying computational problems regarding the three angles to overlapping clusterings, in particular when the overlap is small. We show that the above-mentioned covering problem is NP-complete. We then make structural observations that show that the covering viewpoint and the vertex-splitting viewpoint are equivalent, yielding NP-hardness for the vertex-splitting problem. On the positive side, we show that splitting at most $k$ vertices to obtain a cluster graph has a problem kernel with $O(k)$ vertices. Finally, we observe that combining our hardness results with the so-called critical-clique lemma yields NP-hardness for Cluster Editing with Vertex Splitting, which was previously open (Abu-Khzam et al. [ISCO 2018]) and independently shown to be NP-hard by Arrighi et al. [IPEC 2023]. We observe that a previous version of the critical-clique lemma was flawed; a corrected version has appeared in the meantime on which our hardness result is based.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2024; v1 submitted 1 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
Absence of nematic instability in LiFeAs
Authors:
Michael Wissmann,
Federico Caglieris,
Xiaochen Hong,
Saicharan Aswartham,
Anna Vorobyova,
Igor Morozov,
Bernd Büchner,
Christian Hess
Abstract:
The relationship between unconventional superconductivity, antiferromagnetism and nematic order in iron-based superconductors (FeSCs) is still highly debated. In many FeSCs superconductivity is in proximity of a nematically and magnetically ordered state. LiFeAs is an exceptional stoichiometric FeSC becoming superconducting below 18 K, without undergoing a structural or magnetic transition. Howeve…
▽ More
The relationship between unconventional superconductivity, antiferromagnetism and nematic order in iron-based superconductors (FeSCs) is still highly debated. In many FeSCs superconductivity is in proximity of a nematically and magnetically ordered state. LiFeAs is an exceptional stoichiometric FeSC becoming superconducting below 18 K, without undergoing a structural or magnetic transition. However, some recent experimental studies suggested the existence of finite nematic fluctuations and even a nematic superconducting state. In this study, we employ elastoresistance as a measure of nematic fluctuations in pristine LiFeAs and compare the findings with the elastoresistance of LiFeAs at low Co and V doping levels as well with that of magnetically and nematically ordering NaFeAs. We find LiFeAs and cobalt-doped LiFeAs far away from a nematic instability.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
