Synthetic PET via Domain Translation of 3D MRI
Authors:
Abhejit Rajagopal,
Yutaka Natsuaki,
Kristen Wangerin,
Mahdjoub Hamdi,
Hongyu An,
John J. Sunderland,
Richard Laforest,
Paul E. Kinahan,
Peder E. Z. Larson,
Thomas A. Hope
Abstract:
Historically, patient datasets have been used to develop and validate various reconstruction algorithms for PET/MRI and PET/CT. To enable such algorithm development, without the need for acquiring hundreds of patient exams, in this paper we demonstrate a deep learning technique to generate synthetic but realistic whole-body PET sinograms from abundantly-available whole-body MRI. Specifically, we u…
▽ More
Historically, patient datasets have been used to develop and validate various reconstruction algorithms for PET/MRI and PET/CT. To enable such algorithm development, without the need for acquiring hundreds of patient exams, in this paper we demonstrate a deep learning technique to generate synthetic but realistic whole-body PET sinograms from abundantly-available whole-body MRI. Specifically, we use a dataset of 56 $^{18}$F-FDG-PET/MRI exams to train a 3D residual UNet to predict physiologic PET uptake from whole-body T1-weighted MRI. In training we implemented a balanced loss function to generate realistic uptake across a large dynamic range and computed losses along tomographic lines of response to mimic the PET acquisition. The predicted PET images are forward projected to produce synthetic PET time-of-flight (ToF) sinograms that can be used with vendor-provided PET reconstruction algorithms, including using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) and MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC). The resulting synthetic data recapitulates physiologic $^{18}$F-FDG uptake, e.g. high uptake localized to the brain and bladder, as well as uptake in liver, kidneys, heart and muscle. To simulate abnormalities with high uptake, we also insert synthetic lesions. We demonstrate that this synthetic PET data can be used interchangeably with real PET data for the PET quantification task of comparing CT and MR-based attenuation correction methods, achieving $\leq 7.6\%$ error in mean-SUV compared to using real data. These results together show that the proposed synthetic PET data pipeline can be reasonably used for development, evaluation, and validation of PET/MRI reconstruction methods.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
Attenuation Coefficient Estimation for PET/MRI With Bayesian Deep Learning pseudo-CT and Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Activity and Attenuation
Authors:
Andrew P. Leynes,
Sangtae P. Ahn,
Kristen A. Wangerin,
Sandeep S. Kaushik,
Florian Wiesinger,
Thomas A. Hope,
Peder E. Z. Larson
Abstract:
A major remaining challenge for magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction methods (MRAC) is their susceptibility to sources of MRI artifacts (e.g. implants, motion) and uncertainties due to the limitations of MRI contrast (e.g. accurate bone delineation and density, and separation of air/bone). We propose using a Bayesian deep convolutional neural network that, in addition to generating an i…
▽ More
A major remaining challenge for magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction methods (MRAC) is their susceptibility to sources of MRI artifacts (e.g. implants, motion) and uncertainties due to the limitations of MRI contrast (e.g. accurate bone delineation and density, and separation of air/bone). We propose using a Bayesian deep convolutional neural network that, in addition to generating an initial pseudo-CT from MR data, also produces uncertainty estimates of the pseudo-CT to quantify the limitations of the MR data. These outputs are combined with MLAA reconstruction that uses the PET emission data to improve the attenuation maps. With the proposed approach (UpCT-MLAA), we demonstrate accurate estimation of PET uptake in pelvic lesions and show recovery of metal implants. In patients without implants, UpCT-MLAA had acceptable but slightly higher RMSE than Zero-echo-time and Dixon Deep pseudo-CT when compared to CTAC. In patients with metal implants, MLAA recovered the metal implant; however, anatomy outside the implant region was obscured by noise and crosstalk artifacts. Attenuation coefficients from the pseudo-CT from Dixon MRI were accurate in normal anatomy; however, the metal implant region was estimated to have attenuation coefficients of air. UpCT-MLAA estimated attenuation coefficients of metal implants alongside accurate anatomic depiction outside of implant regions.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2021; v1 submitted 10 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
