Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Vanduffel, S

Modeling coskewness with zero correlation and correlation with zero coskewness

Authors: Carole Bernard, Jinghui Chen, Steven Vanduffel

Abstract: This paper shows that one needs to be careful when making statements on potential links between correlation and coskewness. Specifically, we first show that, on the one hand, it is possible to observe any possible values of coskewness among symmetric random variables but zero pairwise correlations of these variables. On the other hand, it is also possible to have zero coskewness and any level of c… ▽ More This paper shows that one needs to be careful when making statements on potential links between correlation and coskewness. Specifically, we first show that, on the one hand, it is possible to observe any possible values of coskewness among symmetric random variables but zero pairwise correlations of these variables. On the other hand, it is also possible to have zero coskewness and any level of correlation. Second, we generalize this result to the case of arbitrary marginal distributions showing the absence of a general link between rank correlation and standardized rank coskewness. △ Less

Submitted 17 December, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

Comments: 16 pages, 2 figures

Optimal payoff under Bregman-Wasserstein divergence constraints

Authors: Silvana M. Pesenti, Steven Vanduffel, Yang Yang, Jing Yao

Abstract: We study optimal payoff choice for an expected utility maximizer under the constraint that their payoff is not allowed to deviate ``too much'' from a given benchmark. We solve this problem when the deviation is assessed via a Bregman-Wasserstein (BW) divergence, generated by a convex function $φ$. Unlike the Wasserstein distance (i.e., when $φ(x)=x^2$). The inherent asymmetry of the BW divergence… ▽ More We study optimal payoff choice for an expected utility maximizer under the constraint that their payoff is not allowed to deviate ``too much'' from a given benchmark. We solve this problem when the deviation is assessed via a Bregman-Wasserstein (BW) divergence, generated by a convex function $φ$. Unlike the Wasserstein distance (i.e., when $φ(x)=x^2$). The inherent asymmetry of the BW divergence makes it possible to penalize positive deviations different than negative ones. As a main contribution, we provide the optimal payoff in this setting. Numerical examples illustrate that the choice of $φ$ allow to better align the payoff choice with the objectives of investors. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

Optimal Transport Divergences induced by Scoring Functions

Authors: Silvana M. Pesenti, Steven Vanduffel

Abstract: We employ scoring functions, used in statistics for eliciting risk functionals, as cost functions in the Monge-Kantorovich (MK) optimal transport problem. This gives raise to a rich variety of novel asymmetric MK divergences, which subsume the family of Bregman-Wasserstein divergences. We show that for distributions on the real line, the comonotonic coupling is optimal for the majority of the new… ▽ More We employ scoring functions, used in statistics for eliciting risk functionals, as cost functions in the Monge-Kantorovich (MK) optimal transport problem. This gives raise to a rich variety of novel asymmetric MK divergences, which subsume the family of Bregman-Wasserstein divergences. We show that for distributions on the real line, the comonotonic coupling is optimal for the majority of the new divergences. Specifically, we derive the optimal coupling of the MK divergences induced by functionals including the mean, generalised quantiles, expectiles, and shortfall measures. Furthermore, we show that while any elicitable law-invariant coherent risk measure gives raise to infinitely many MK divergences, the comonotonic coupling is simultaneously optimal. The novel MK divergences, which can be efficiently calculated, open an array of applications in robust stochastic optimisation. We derive sharp bounds on distortion risk measures under a Bregman-Wasserstein divergence constraint, and solve for cost-efficient payoffs under benchmark constraints. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2024; v1 submitted 20 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Coskewness under dependence uncertainty

Authors: Carole Bernard, Jinghui Chen, Ludger Ruschendorf, Steven Vanduffel

Abstract: We study the impact of dependence uncertainty on the expectation of the product of $d$ random variables, $\mathbb{E}(X_1X_2\cdots X_d)$ when $X_i \sim F_i$ for all~$i$. Under some conditions on the $F_i$, explicit sharp bounds are obtained and a numerical method is provided to approximate them for arbitrary choices of the $F_i$. The results are applied to assess the impact of dependence uncertaint… ▽ More We study the impact of dependence uncertainty on the expectation of the product of $d$ random variables, $\mathbb{E}(X_1X_2\cdots X_d)$ when $X_i \sim F_i$ for all~$i$. Under some conditions on the $F_i$, explicit sharp bounds are obtained and a numerical method is provided to approximate them for arbitrary choices of the $F_i$. The results are applied to assess the impact of dependence uncertainty on coskewness. In this regard, we introduce a novel notion of "standardized rank coskewness," which is invariant under strictly increasing transformations and takes values in $[-1,\ 1]$. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Cost-efficient Payoffs under Model Ambiguity

Authors: Carole Bernard, Gero Junike, Thibaut Lux, Steven Vanduffel

Abstract: Dybvig (1988a,b) solves in a complete market setting the problem of finding a payoff that is cheapest possible in reaching a given target distribution ("cost-efficient payoff"). In the presence of ambiguity, the distribution of a payoff is, however, no longer known with certainty. We study the problem of finding the cheapest possible payoff whose worst-case distribution stochastically dominates a… ▽ More Dybvig (1988a,b) solves in a complete market setting the problem of finding a payoff that is cheapest possible in reaching a given target distribution ("cost-efficient payoff"). In the presence of ambiguity, the distribution of a payoff is, however, no longer known with certainty. We study the problem of finding the cheapest possible payoff whose worst-case distribution stochastically dominates a given target distribution ("robust cost-efficient payoff") and determine solutions under certain conditions. We study the link between "robust cost-efficiency" and the maxmin expected utility setting of Gilboa and Schmeidler, as well as more generally with robust preferences in a possibly non-expected utility setting. Specifically, we show that solutions to maxmin robust expected utility are necessarily robust cost-efficient. We illustrate our study with examples involving uncertainty both on the drift and on the volatility of the risky asset. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2023; v1 submitted 6 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

MSC Class: 91B30; 62E17

Robust Distortion Risk Measures

Authors: Carole Bernard, Silvana M. Pesenti, Steven Vanduffel

Abstract: The robustness of risk measures to changes in underlying loss distributions (distributional uncertainty) is of crucial importance in making well-informed decisions. In this paper, we quantify, for the class of distortion risk measures with an absolutely continuous distortion function, its robustness to distributional uncertainty by deriving its largest (smallest) value when the underlying loss dis… ▽ More The robustness of risk measures to changes in underlying loss distributions (distributional uncertainty) is of crucial importance in making well-informed decisions. In this paper, we quantify, for the class of distortion risk measures with an absolutely continuous distortion function, its robustness to distributional uncertainty by deriving its largest (smallest) value when the underlying loss distribution has a known mean and variance and, furthermore, lies within a ball - specified through the Wasserstein distance - around a reference distribution. We employ the technique of isotonic projections to provide for these distortion risk measures a complete characterisation of sharp bounds on their value, and we obtain quasi-explicit bounds in the case of Value-at-Risk and Range-Value-at-Risk. We extend our results to account for uncertainty in the first two moments and provide applications to portfolio optimisation and to model risk assessment. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2023; v1 submitted 18 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

The Minimum Regularized Covariance Determinant estimator

Authors: Kris Boudt, Peter J. Rousseeuw, Steven Vanduffel, Tim Verdonck

Abstract: The Minimum Covariance Determinant (MCD) approach robustly estimates the location and scatter matrix using the subset of given size with lowest sample covariance determinant. Its main drawback is that it cannot be applied when the dimension exceeds the subset size. We propose the Minimum Regularized Covariance Determinant (MRCD) approach, which differs from the MCD in that the scatter matrix is a… ▽ More The Minimum Covariance Determinant (MCD) approach robustly estimates the location and scatter matrix using the subset of given size with lowest sample covariance determinant. Its main drawback is that it cannot be applied when the dimension exceeds the subset size. We propose the Minimum Regularized Covariance Determinant (MRCD) approach, which differs from the MCD in that the scatter matrix is a convex combination of a target matrix and the sample covariance matrix of the subset. A data-driven procedure sets the weight of the target matrix, so that the regularization is only used when needed. The MRCD estimator is defined in any dimension, is well-conditioned by construction and preserves the good robustness properties of the MCD. We prove that so-called concentration steps can be performed to reduce the MRCD objective function, and we exploit this fact to construct a fast algorithm. We verify the accuracy and robustness of the MRCD estimator in a simulation study and illustrate its practical use for outlier detection and regression analysis on real-life high-dimensional data sets in chemistry and criminology. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2018; v1 submitted 24 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Journal ref: Statistics and Computing, 2020, Vol. 30, 113-128

Quantile of a Mixture

Authors: Carole Bernard, Steven Vanduffel

Abstract: In this note, we give an explicit expression for the quantile of a mixture of two random variables. We carefully examine all possible cases of discrete and continuous variables with possibly unbounded support. The result is useful for finding bounds on the Value-at-Risk of risky portfolios when only partial information is available (Bernard and Vanduffel (2014)). In this note, we give an explicit expression for the quantile of a mixture of two random variables. We carefully examine all possible cases of discrete and continuous variables with possibly unbounded support. The result is useful for finding bounds on the Value-at-Risk of risky portfolios when only partial information is available (Bernard and Vanduffel (2014)). △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

Optimal Payoffs under State-dependent Preferences

Authors: Carole Bernard, Franck Moraux, Ludger Rueschendorf, Steven Vanduffel

Abstract: Most decision theories, including expected utility theory, rank dependent utility theory and cumulative prospect theory, assume that investors are only interested in the distribution of returns and not in the states of the economy in which income is received. Optimal payoffs have their lowest outcomes when the economy is in a downturn, and this feature is often at odds with the needs of many inves… ▽ More Most decision theories, including expected utility theory, rank dependent utility theory and cumulative prospect theory, assume that investors are only interested in the distribution of returns and not in the states of the economy in which income is received. Optimal payoffs have their lowest outcomes when the economy is in a downturn, and this feature is often at odds with the needs of many investors. We introduce a framework for portfolio selection within which state-dependent preferences can be accommodated. Specifically, we assume that investors care about the distribution of final wealth and its interaction with some benchmark. In this context, we are able to characterize optimal payoffs in explicit form. Furthermore, we extend the classical expected utility optimization problem of Merton to the state-dependent situation. Some applications in security design are discussed in detail and we also solve some stochastic extensions of the target probability optimization problem. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2014; v1 submitted 29 August, 2013; originally announced August 2013.

Rationalizing Investors Choice

Authors: Carole Bernard, Jit Seng Chen, Steven Vanduffel

Abstract: Assuming that agents' preferences satisfy first-order stochastic dominance, we show how the Expected Utility paradigm can rationalize all optimal investment choices: the optimal investment strategy in any behavioral law-invariant (state-independent) setting corresponds to the optimum for an expected utility maximizer with an explicitly derived concave non-decreasing utility function. This result e… ▽ More Assuming that agents' preferences satisfy first-order stochastic dominance, we show how the Expected Utility paradigm can rationalize all optimal investment choices: the optimal investment strategy in any behavioral law-invariant (state-independent) setting corresponds to the optimum for an expected utility maximizer with an explicitly derived concave non-decreasing utility function. This result enables us to infer the utility and risk aversion of agents from their investment choice in a non-parametric way. We relate the property of decreasing absolute risk aversion (DARA) to distributional properties of the terminal wealth and of the financial market. Specifically, we show that DARA is equivalent to a demand for a terminal wealth that has more spread than the opposite of the log pricing kernel at the investment horizon. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2014; v1 submitted 19 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.