-
Periodic portfolio selection with quasi-hyperbolic discounting
Authors:
Yushi Hamaguchi,
Alex S. L. Tse
Abstract:
We introduce an infinite-horizon, continuous-time portfolio selection problem faced by an agent with periodic S-shaped preference and present bias. The inclusion of a quasi-hyperbolic discount function leads to time-inconsistency and we characterize the optimal portfolio for a pre-committing, naive and sophisticated agent respectively. In the more theoretically challenging problem with a sophistic…
▽ More
We introduce an infinite-horizon, continuous-time portfolio selection problem faced by an agent with periodic S-shaped preference and present bias. The inclusion of a quasi-hyperbolic discount function leads to time-inconsistency and we characterize the optimal portfolio for a pre-committing, naive and sophisticated agent respectively. In the more theoretically challenging problem with a sophisticated agent, the time-consistent planning strategy can be formulated as an equilibrium to a static mean field game. Interestingly, present bias and naivety do not necessarily result in less desirable risk taking behaviors, while agent's sophistication may lead to excessive leverage (underinvestement) in the bad (good) states of the world.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Portfolio Optimization under Transaction Costs with Recursive Preferences
Authors:
Martin Herdegen,
David Hobson,
Alex S. L. Tse
Abstract:
The Merton investment-consumption problem is fundamental, both in the field of finance, and in stochastic control. An important extension of the problem adds transaction costs, which is highly relevant from a financial perspective but also challenging from a control perspective because the solution now involves singular control. A further significant extension takes us from additive utility to sto…
▽ More
The Merton investment-consumption problem is fundamental, both in the field of finance, and in stochastic control. An important extension of the problem adds transaction costs, which is highly relevant from a financial perspective but also challenging from a control perspective because the solution now involves singular control. A further significant extension takes us from additive utility to stochastic differential utility (SDU), which allows time preferences and risk preferences to be disentangled.
In this paper, we study this extended version of the Merton problem with proportional transaction costs and Epstein-Zin SDU. We fully characterise all parameter combinations for which the problem is well posed (which may depend on the level of transaction costs) and provide a full verification argument that relies on no additional technical assumptions and uses primal methods only. The case with SDU requires new mathematical techniques as duality methods break down.
Even in the special case of (additive) power utility, our arguments are significantly simpler, more elegant and more far-reaching than the ones in the extant literature. This means that we can easily analyse aspects of the problem which previously have been very challenging, including comparative statics, boundary cases which heretofore have required separate treatment and the situation beyond the small transaction cost regime. A key and novel idea is to parametrise consumption and the value function in terms of the shadow fraction of wealth, which may be of much wider applicability.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
The importance of dynamic risk constraints for limited liability operators
Authors:
John Armstrong,
Damiano Brigo,
Alex S. L. Tse
Abstract:
Previous literature shows that prevalent risk measures such as Value at Risk or Expected Shortfall are ineffective to curb excessive risk-taking by a tail-risk-seeking trader with S-shaped utility function in the context of portfolio optimisation. However, these conclusions hold only when the constraints are static in the sense that the risk measure is just applied to the terminal portfolio value.…
▽ More
Previous literature shows that prevalent risk measures such as Value at Risk or Expected Shortfall are ineffective to curb excessive risk-taking by a tail-risk-seeking trader with S-shaped utility function in the context of portfolio optimisation. However, these conclusions hold only when the constraints are static in the sense that the risk measure is just applied to the terminal portfolio value. In this paper, we consider a portfolio optimisation problem featuring S-shaped utility and a dynamic risk constraint which is imposed throughout the entire trading horizon. Provided that the risk control policy is sufficiently strict relative to the asset performance, the trader's portfolio strategies and the resulting maximal expected utility can be effectively constrained by a dynamic risk measure. Finally, we argue that dynamic risk constraints might still be ineffective if the trader has access to a derivatives market.
△ Less
Submitted 6 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Speculative Trading, Prospect Theory and Transaction Costs
Authors:
Alex S. L. Tse,
Harry Zheng
Abstract:
A speculative agent with Prospect Theory preference chooses the optimal time to purchase and then to sell an indivisible risky asset to maximize the expected utility of the round-trip profit net of transaction costs. The optimization problem is formulated as a sequential optimal stopping problem and we provide a complete characterization of the solution. Depending on the preference and market para…
▽ More
A speculative agent with Prospect Theory preference chooses the optimal time to purchase and then to sell an indivisible risky asset to maximize the expected utility of the round-trip profit net of transaction costs. The optimization problem is formulated as a sequential optimal stopping problem and we provide a complete characterization of the solution. Depending on the preference and market parameters, the optimal strategy can be "buy and hold", "buy low sell high", "buy high sell higher" or "no trading". Behavioral preference and market friction interact in a subtle way which yields surprising implications on the agent's trading patterns. For example, increasing the market entry fee does not necessarily curb speculative trading, but instead it may induce a higher reference point under which the agent becomes more risk-seeking and in turn is more likely to trade.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2022; v1 submitted 22 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Dividend Policy and Capital Structure of a Defaultable Firm
Authors:
Alex S. L. Tse
Abstract:
Default risk significantly affects the corporate policies of a firm. We develop a model in which a limited liability entity subject to Poisson default shock jointly sets its dividend policy and capital structure to maximize the expected lifetime utility from consumption of risk averse equity investors. We give a complete characterization of the solution to the singular stochastic control problem.…
▽ More
Default risk significantly affects the corporate policies of a firm. We develop a model in which a limited liability entity subject to Poisson default shock jointly sets its dividend policy and capital structure to maximize the expected lifetime utility from consumption of risk averse equity investors. We give a complete characterization of the solution to the singular stochastic control problem. The optimal policy involves paying dividends to keep the ratio of firm's equity value to investors' wealth below a critical threshold. Dividend payout acts as a precautionary channel to transfer wealth from the firm to investors for mitigation of losses in the event of default. Higher the default risk, more aggressively the firm leverages and pays dividends.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
A multi-asset investment and consumption problem with transaction costs
Authors:
David Hobson,
Alex S. L. Tse,
Yeqi Zhu
Abstract:
In this article we study a multi-asset version of the Merton investment and consumption problem with proportional transaction costs. In general it is difficult to make analytical progress towards a solution in such problems, but we specialise to a case where transaction costs are zero except for sales and purchases of a single asset which we call the illiquid asset.
Assuming agents have CRRA uti…
▽ More
In this article we study a multi-asset version of the Merton investment and consumption problem with proportional transaction costs. In general it is difficult to make analytical progress towards a solution in such problems, but we specialise to a case where transaction costs are zero except for sales and purchases of a single asset which we call the illiquid asset.
Assuming agents have CRRA utilities and asset prices follow exponential Brownian motions we show that the underlying HJB equation can be transformed into a boundary value problem for a first order differential equation. The optimal strategy is to trade the illiquid asset only when the fraction of the total portfolio value invested in this asset falls outside a fixed interval. Important properties of the multi-asset problem (including when the problem is well-posed, ill-posed, or well-posed only for large transaction costs) can be inferred from the behaviours of a quadratic function of a single variable and another algebraic function.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
Optimal consumption and investment under transaction costs
Authors:
David Hobson,
Alex S. L. Tse,
Yeqi Zhu
Abstract:
In this article we consider the Merton problem in a market with a single risky asset and transaction costs. We give a complete solution of the problem up to the solution of a free-boundary problem for a first-order differential equation, and find that the form of the solution (whether the problem is well-posed, whether the problem is well-posed only for large transaction costs, whether the no-tran…
▽ More
In this article we consider the Merton problem in a market with a single risky asset and transaction costs. We give a complete solution of the problem up to the solution of a free-boundary problem for a first-order differential equation, and find that the form of the solution (whether the problem is well-posed, whether the problem is well-posed only for large transaction costs, whether the no-transaction wedge lies in the first, second or fourth quadrants) depends only on a quadratic whose co-efficients are functions of the parameters of the problem, and then only through the value and slope of this quadratic at zero, one and the turning point.
We find that for some parameter values and for large transaction costs the location of the boundary at which sales of the risky asset occur is independent of the transaction cost on purchases. We give both a mathematical and financial reason for this phenomena.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
