Gamma-ray background from rock: studies for a next-generation dark matter experiment based on liquid xenon
Authors:
J. K. Tranter,
V. A. Kudryavtsev,
P. R. Scovell
Abstract:
Rare event experiments, such as those targeting dark matter interactions and neutrinoless double beta (0$νββ$) decay, should be shielded from gamma-rays that originated in rock. This paper describes the simulation of gamma-ray transport through the water shielding and assessment of the thickness needed to suppress the background from rock down to a negligible level. This study focuses on a next-ge…
▽ More
Rare event experiments, such as those targeting dark matter interactions and neutrinoless double beta (0$νββ$) decay, should be shielded from gamma-rays that originated in rock. This paper describes the simulation of gamma-ray transport through the water shielding and assessment of the thickness needed to suppress the background from rock down to a negligible level. This study focuses on a next-generation xenon observatory with a wide range of measurements including the search for Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) and 0$νββ$ decay of $^{136}$Xe. Our findings indicate that the gamma-ray background is unlikely to persist through analysis cuts in the WIMP energy range (0 - 20 keV) after 3.5 m of water, complemented by 0.5 m of liquid scintillator. For 0$νββ$ decay, a background below 1 event in 10 years of running can be achieved with a fiducial mass of 39.3 tonnes. Furthermore, for typical radioactivity levels of 1 Bq kg$^{-1}$ of $^{232}$Th and $^{238}$U we have studied the effect of reducing the water shielding by 1 m, resulting in a reduced fiducial mass of 19.1 tonnes for 0$νββ$ decay and still a negligible background for WIMP search. The paper also presents the measurements of radioactivity in rock in the Boulby mine, which hosted several dark matter experiments in the past and is also a potential site for a future dual-phase xenon experiment. The measurements are used to normalise simulation results and assess the required shielding at Boulby.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2025; v1 submitted 15 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
Trust and Safety
Authors:
S. K. Devitt,
R. Horne,
Z. Assaad,
E. Broad,
H. Kurniawati,
B. Cardier,
A. Scott,
S. Lazar,
M. Gould,
C. Adamson,
C. Karl,
F. Schrever,
S. Keay,
K. Tranter,
E. Shellshear,
D. Hunter,
M. Brady,
T. Putland
Abstract:
Robotics in Australia have a long history of conforming with safety standards and risk managed practices. This chapter articulates the current state of trust and safety in robotics including society's expectations, safety management systems and system safety as well as emerging issues and methods for ensuring safety in increasingly autonomous robotics. The future of trust and safety will combine s…
▽ More
Robotics in Australia have a long history of conforming with safety standards and risk managed practices. This chapter articulates the current state of trust and safety in robotics including society's expectations, safety management systems and system safety as well as emerging issues and methods for ensuring safety in increasingly autonomous robotics. The future of trust and safety will combine standards with iterative, adaptive and responsive regulatory and assurance methods for diverse applications of robotics, autonomous systems and artificial intelligence (RAS-AI). Robotics will need novel technical and social approaches to achieve assurance, particularly for game-changing innovations. The ability for users to easily update algorithms and software, which alters the performance of a system, implies that traditional machine assurance performed prior to deployment or sale, will no longer be viable. Moreover, the high frequency of updates implies that traditional certification that requires substantial time will no longer be practical. To alleviate these difficulties, automation of assurance will likely be needed; something like 'ASsurance-as-a-Service' (ASaaS), where APIs constantly ping RAS-AI to ensure abidance with various rules, frameworks and behavioural expectations. There are exceptions to this, such as in contested or communications denied environments, or in underground or undersea mining; and these systems need their own risk assessments and limitations imposed. Indeed, self-monitors are already operating within some systems. To ensure safe operations of future robotics systems, Australia needs to invest in RAS-AI assurance research, stakeholder engagement and continued development and refinement of robust frameworks, methods, guidelines and policy in order to educate and prepare its technology developers, certifiers, and general population.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
